11 Replies Latest reply on Apr 2, 2012 9:08 PM by Pumpino

    DZ68DB questions


      I'm thinking of getting a DZ68DB to use in one of my systems. I've got a couple of questions before I take the plunge.


      1. Is the lack of all-solid capacitors on this board likely to reduce its lifespan? Other manufacturers are really pushing the "all-solid capacitors" line at the moment.


      2. I noticed that the ME code for the latest bios is only v7. Many of the other Intel models, and my Asus Z68 board use v8. Is this a significant consideration, and will it be upgraded in the future?


      3. I believe the DZ68BC and DZ68ZV bioses use a black theme. Any chance of switching to that in a future update and scrapping the dated colour scheme I've seen in screenshots of the DZ68DB's bios?


      4. I know the bios isn't graphical like Asus. Does this mean it's not UEFI? If not, what's the significance of this? Slower boot?


      5. Does Intel tend to provide driver updates for a decent length of time? Having a look at some older boards suggests they do. I've noticed others, particularly Asus, will provide updates for a few months and then no more.



        • 1. Re: DZ68DB questions

          Interesting questions.  Some difficult to answer without knowing Intel's plans, which I guess they may not even know themselves.


          1.  Not sure about this, but I have a couple of conflicting thoughts.  Solid state capacitors apparently cost more, and those who use them consider them a selling point.  There's got to be a reason for that.  However, you're not going to notice a difference in the board's performance - it's not a feature where you're paying more to get a specific result that you can quantify in your daily use.  And, at least when I bought mine, the DZ68DB board was at least somewhat less expensive than the competition.  I only keep PCs for 2-3 years, so longevity is less of an issue to me than the experience when I actually have it.


          2.  No clue.  However, I can tell you that I'm running the current BIOS with no issues I'm aware of.  Everything works as expected including SSD Caching and Virtu.


          3.  Don't know but I've been using Intel boards for a long time, and I'd be surprised if this is something they chose to put resourses into on an already-released board.


          4.  The BIOS supports UEFI.  Maybe slower boot - I always think Intel boards boot slowly, but there are optimizations I don't take advantage of, and I basically never boot anyway.  If you use Sleep instead of shutting down, you can push the button as you walk up to the desk.  By the time you sit down, it'll be ready for your password - it literally wakes from sleep in 1-2 seconds.


          5.  In my experience, Intel updates drivers for as long as necessary.  I'm still gettin fairly frequent updates for my DZ68DB, mostly for graphics and network.  Other things like the chipset drivers really don't have to be updated in the absence of a bug or similar - once they work, they work.


          I can sum up my experience with Dell boards this way:  they're probably not as exciting or configurable as some other brands.  Their quailty is as good as any, if not better.  I don't overclock or anything along those lines, and I've found Intel boards, including my current DZ68DB, to be rock solid at a value price.  If you're looking for something ultra fancy or for overclocking, this probably isn't the board.  But if you just want a board that will work as expected for a long time, without aggravating you, this is a good choice.

          1 of 1 people found this helpful
          • 2. Re: DZ68DB questions

            Thanks for the reply.


            I ended up getting the board and installed it last night. I actually prefer the text based bios to the Asus graphical bios, and the colour scheme isn't as bad as it appeared in online screenshots. I've installed all the drivers and it runs like a dream in Windows 7 and linux.


            The one issue I've experienced is that I installed Intel Desktop Utilities in Windows, and when I open it, it just hangs while trying to obtain system information. So the program remains unresponsive and is consequently useless. Is there a reason for this?

            • 3. Re: DZ68DB questions

              I ran IDU for a long time on my 64-bit Win7 with what I thought were no issues - IDU itself worked fine for me, so I can't imagine what's going on.  Maybe uninstall and reinstall it?  Also, there are a number of versions depending on the board.  I'm assuming you installed one that lists the DZ68 as a supported board?


              I had ongoing issues with video playback stuttering.  Shortly before I planned to throw the PC through the window, I discovered this thread and uninstalled IDU as a result.  I keep checking for a fixed version (which is actually how I found your post the other day) but so far, one has not been released.  Too bad, because I really like it, and have even had it alert me of an overheating/failed fan situation on my previous Intel motherboard.  I had stuttering in every video playback situation - live and recorded TV, YouTube, saved video files, etc.  http://communities.intel.com/thread/26980?start=0&tstart=0

              • 4. Re: DZ68DB questions

                I reintalled it as you suggested and after rebooting, it worked. Maybe it had failed to install properly because I installed all the drivers one after the other without rebooting after each one.


                It's reporting that the temperature of my Crucial m4 SSD is 100 degrees and that it's over the thresold. I've never had a problem with the drive so I'm not sure what to think.



                • 6. Re: DZ68DB questions

                  You learn something new every day, I guess.  What I leared today is that apparently SSDs don't have temperature monitors (they run around room temp), so monitoring software sometimes reports random results.  See these posts on the Crucial forums:





                  • 7. Re: DZ68DB questions

                    You beat me to it : -)

                    • 8. Re: DZ68DB questions



                      I am the software architect responsible for Intel(R) Desktop Utilities (IDU). This is an interesting discovery (and explains why we have been unable to reproduce this issue). We only expose HDD/SSD temperatures for drives that report themselves as having a temperature sensor (particular S.M.A.R.T. attribute(s) are used to obtain their temperatures). I presently don't have one of these particular drives, however, so cannot look into why this is happening. Can one of you please send me a dump of the drive's S.M.A.R.T. attributes table (from a tool like RWEverything or something similar)? If you don't want your information posted publicly, you can send it to me as a private message...


                      Thanks in advance,


                      • 9. Re: DZ68DB questions

                        Not me, sorry.  My SSD seems to report temperature accurately -  about a degree lower than the mechanical drives.


                        Any word on the audio and video stuttering in the current version of the IDU?  I reinstalled it and video playback started stuttering even before the reboot.  I'd be happy to send you logs, monitoring info or whatever to help work that one out.



                        • 10. Re: DZ68DB questions

                          Sorry, the RST team is still investigating this issue. I am waiting just as you are...

                          • 11. Re: DZ68DB questions

                            I can't say I'm bothered by not knowing the temp of my SSD.


                            I'm hanging out for the DZ77SL-50K and DZ77BH-55K to be made available. I'm guessing it might be 9th April, which I've heard is the official release date of the Z77 chipset, but I'm getting off-topic now...