The Server Room Blog

Previous Next
3


Innovation can hit a wall - ever wonder why you really want a "real" workstation?

At a recent ISV event last week in Las Vegas, I met several end users who wished they had purchased a "real" workstation - what they had bought was a high-end desktop computer with a recommended high-end graphics card. What they got was disillusionment, sub-par performance and countless support nightmares. Workstations are designed and tested for performance, stability and expandability. The software application works and it delivers on performance because it is designed to.

To level set everyone, I view the workstation as the essential technology tool for professional creators that can quickly and efficiently transform complex data into actionable information. Key words transform data and actionable information. High quality decisions can be made without delay.

Workstations, for me, represent the single most important innovation engine used by professionals to generate end customer value. As such, they are the workhorse. They must be dependable, scalable and powerful enough to get out of the way of end user innovation.

So, what gets in the way of innovation? I have my top 3.

1) First is the dreaded hour glass or the innovation inhibitor as I like to call it. To me the hour glass is one of the most dangerous innovation inhibitors. It has no place in a workstation solution. If the hour glass appears, innovation can be quickly lost or sidetracked. Creative thought is disrupted and a good idea --- well it just got away while we wait for the workstation to respond to our request.

2) Data size. Until recently, data sizes have been limited and have forced workstation users to work with small sub sets of data. The result, users often miss seeing important trends that occur in larger assemblies and or models. These missed trends, while not halting innovation, certainly play a key role in extending the time for innovation to occur as smaller data sizes limit a more complete awareness of strategic differences.

3) Perhaps the most dangerous innovation inhibitor is the one that has the least to do with technology and the most to do with how companies work. New technologies found in today's workstations have transformed these tools in to powerful workstation supercomputers. This new breed is capable of delivering near supercomputer performance at an individual's desk enabling users to quickly iterate through ideas and potentially innovate faster than ever before.

There is an old poster I remember as a kid, I think it plays here as well. The saying went something like this --- I have been rich and I have poor; rich is better. Well the same is true in workstations - I have been fast and I have been slow - fast is better. More accurately workstations with certified applications and graphics cards can help deliver the performance, stability and scalability you need to innovate faster. They can deliver the technology that gets out of the way of your users capability to innovate. Enabling them to create value faster than ever before on Intel based workstations.

High-end desktops with powerful graphics may not really be all that you want or need. In fact high-end desktop computers, while marginally less expensive, may not be, in the end, what you can afford as you potentially experience less than adequate performance and below industry average innovation.

Which can you afford?

Average User Rating
(0 ratings)


Add a comment Leave a comment on this blog post.
Dec 4, 2007 9:55 AM Reply Guest Theo,

Real innovative ideas take a little longer than an instance, so your hour glass argument is suspect. In the aerospace and automotive industries simulations to test out innovative ideas will run for days, and don't run on a workstation. Modifying a 3D model requires skill and time, and setting up an experiment to test an idea takes hours.

So I am trying to figure out what customer you are talking about? It certainly is not an HPC customer.,

Dec 4, 2007 10:27 AM Reply Click to view W_Shimanek's profile W_Shimanek in response to: Theo,

Theo,
Thanks for comments and I agree with you -- innovation does not happen in an instant.
My intent was not to imply that innovation happens in an instant, rather my intent was to suggest that today’s workstations resemble supercomputers of just a few years and there are inherent advantages to using larger more robust workstation supercomputers to iterate through early design options and then use large clusters for mega size jobs. Dr. Luis Rosales a CFD consultant caught it when he said ““I’d rather have the multi-core (workstation). I can do my CAD, meshing, solving and result review on one system without going over the network and I can do my preliminary and setup runs right here on one machine.” I believe he is suggesting that today’s more powerful workstations working in concert with large clusters actually improve resource utilization of three critical assets at a company.

  • First the user as he or she can create, validate and change faster on a powerful workstation.
  • Second the workstation – as you point out there are idle cycles and increasing these cycles might not be a good idea --- unless you increase it enough to work differently and grab those idle cycles for more productive work. The key is not to interfere with what workstation is designed for – interactive workloads.
  • The third asset utilization improvement is that of the cluster it self. By removing smaller models from the cluster it is free to solve large scale problems with out interruption by smaller models.

One more thought. Perhaps the best thing about these new workstations supercomputers is that small medium businesses that most likely do not or can not invest in clusters can now access resources to affordably model large scale problems. Per my friends at Ansys – their users can model jobs as large as 5 million degrees of freedom and still have power enough to interactively work on the next design.

Thanks again for your comments.

Dec 4, 2007 1:31 PM Reply Guest Theo_Omtzigt, in response to: W_Shimanek

Thank you for the clarification. I think the degree of innovation is the differentiating factor in our arguments.

The workflow you have described: modify and test on a workstation and potentially aggregate on a cluster, only works for workloads that are small. 5 million degrees of freedom is a small problem for computational science and engineering. Innovation through high-performance computing is working in the domain of 1B DOFs or more and works in the peta/exa scale as far as computes (total flops executed for a problem) is concerned.

With that clarification I totally agree with your statement: the multi-core workstations are fantastic vehicles for bringing the SMBs to the innovation table. However, it should be clear that this is a late adoption crowd: the multi-core workstation is just the next generation workstation that this community can buy, but it is still being used in the same way as the previous generation with the same software and the same workflow. The innovation we are talking about is at the level needed to sustain the SMBs. We are not talking about innovation in fusion, micro-fluidics, or complex combustion processes.,