IT@Intel Blog

Previous Next
7

In my blog inside Intel I'm exploring some ideas for social media implementation, and would like to throw them out here to the IT Community for input. Our social media implementation is a bit patchwork at the moment, so I'm looking at ways to help fill it in. In this case, the idea is to open up our current method of corporate employee communication.

Currently, our intranet is a fairly static site. Most news and articles are just fixed web posts, and what I've been exploring is adding an open discussion area on the end of every article published on any intranet site. Then any reader who has something to ask or add on a topic can contribute. It may be a simple link to related material, or it may be detailed thoughts on the topic. There may be no comments for an FYI about a local road closure, or a lengthy exchange about some of our product strategies. If the topic draws out a reader who cares enough to add thoughts, the net result of those inputs creates material that is more valuable than the post alone. At worst it shows what people think of a topic, and at best there could be ideas, information, and discourse that adds a lot more than the original post.

The second piece of this change would be to allow employees to directly submit their own articles and material, similar to something you might see on del.icio.us or Digg. Those sites are very different, but together they enable every single employee to quickly share content they find valuable, and provide a mechanism for the best of that content to rise up for all to see. It's a staggering difference from the tops-down, management sanitized communication we get today. It leverages the incredible knowledge and brainpower already present across Intel, and starts building a valuable repository of information that no centralized, "tops down" organized project could accomplish.

Perhaps it gets to the heart of an ongoing debate about the role of IT - are we an enabler for existing technical demand, or do we have an obligation to stretch the rest of the company in new behavorial directions around technology? I'm a believer in the latter, but it's far from a settled issue.

Do any of you allow that sort of deep participation in all levels of employee communications? Is your company even one that would allow it? As I work this issue internally, I'd really like to hear how others address it.

Average User Rating
(1 rating)


Add a comment Leave a comment on this blog post.
Sep 28, 2007 10:33 AM Reply Guest Juan

Hi,

I work for Vodafone IT, and I am working exactly on the same matter. Who has the ownership of driving the changes forward will not make a difference. Who ever gets a flavour on how to do this, now has the challenge to convince the management.

I am now starting to build a detailed project plan to implement this, but I see nothing public on this matter in other companies. Do you know of wany successful cases? What are your experiences?

Oct 11, 2007 1:33 PM Reply Guest Joe Simone

Jeff,

I just read your article on work place blogs and I am interested in contacting for more information. Please let me know what the best way to reach you.

Joe Simone
Action EMS

Nov 15, 2007 8:37 AM Reply Guest Dan Smith

Aloha Jeff,
I recently received the Intel Premier IT magazine and read with great interest your article on blogs and wikis. I work for a blogless firm but we may yet create some blogs. There are more IT rules now compared to when we started a very productive intranet in the last century which still grows today.
Last year we used the SocialText wiki product very successfully for some external coordination for many months until we had to pay and our IT people took a dim view of it. Our trial with SocialText helped them improve the product so I'm not embarrassed by a lot of free use.
Please take a look at my (very simple) website and see if I might phone you about my academic blog studies.
Thank you.
Dan

Dec 4, 2007 1:40 PM Reply Guest Susan Siegel in response to: Dan Smith

I'm looking for some industry best practices on Employee Communications tools and am interested in how your internal blogs and changes to your static intranet at Intel may have progressed over the past few months. At BEA we also have a static intranet, we use podcasting to get information to employees, as well as standard email blasts, e-newsletters, etc. But if there are tools that you find working to disseminate information, would love to hear abou them

Dec 4, 2007 2:10 PM Reply Click to view Steve Bell's profile Steve Bell in response to: Susan Siegel

Susan - you can contact me to get a deeper dive into your question. We have added all employee communications via our intranet - to be open to two way communications by adding them to our blog environment. Getting a two way dialog on the normal news items has been helpful with questions, answers and a deeper discussion. I feel we have pretty much the same communications channels that you do as well. We are attempting to find ways of delivery that are more up to date. Our email blasts, go out, the interesting items may or may not get looked at. We know if they do - but when you know you blasted to 90K folks and 500 look at the further... Effective? We are also trying to reduce our email workload - and have found that our social media (blogs and wiki's) have helped with some teams reductions. We have other items in the works.

Dec 4, 2007 2:12 PM Reply Click to view Steve Bell's profile Steve Bell in response to: Joe Simone

Dan - Jeff has moved into a new role. So, I am not sure he is keeping up with his stuff. If you want to contact me - you can. Steve Bell (email - stephen.l.bell@intel.com or 480-554-5426)

Jun 10, 2008 11:06 PM Reply Guest Norzaiha

I miss reading your internal blog posts ... sigh ...
Hope things are going great there.