Home > Intel Communities > Embedded Forum > ATCA/uTCA > Blog > Tags > emerson

ATCA/uTCA FEATURED Blog

7 Posts tagged with the emerson tag
0

 

I mentioned in my last blog that the people behind ATCA have been looking towards the push for next generation technologies. In the case of I/O, this is being driven by new technologies, but the one I will focus on for this entry is power. ATCA is looking to expand into new market areas, while also meeting the increasing capacity demands of its current market space. To do this requires more performance on a simplistic level. And as we know, increased performance tends to require more power, which in turn generates more heat.

 

 

 

Which brings us to “shall” and “shall not.”

 

 

 

One of the most important instances where we reach this crossroads is when considering a change in ATCA specification in terms of power per blade. Initially, ATCA blades were limited to 200W of power, which of course implied that the chassis surrounding it can

cool a 200W blade.

 

However, the latest releases of ATCA-based blades no longer have this restriction. The specification that used to state that an ATCA blade shall be limited to 200W per slot has now changed to a shall not exceed 400W, although at different places within the specification. Obviously, this is an important difference. It allows the ATCA designer to use more powerful CPU solutions to meet that ever increasing curve of capacity requests and enables the ability to support more cores, more memory and more storage. In short, a single “shall” allows ATCA to expand in a much needed direction.

0 Comments Permalink
0

At recent conferences and exhibitions we (Emerson Network Power) have shown a video clip we made to demonstrate the idea that MicroTCA is suitable technology as a base for various rugged applications. Ahead of the official Rugged MicroTCA specifications, this video was created to show what might be possible in an air cooled environment.

 

Previously we’d developed a video clip showing a proof of concept MicroTCA system using totally standard AMCs operating while being vigorously shaken on a vibration table in our lab. This was pretty impressive even though the vibration was limited to a single axis. This time we wanted to widen the scope to show a more realistic scenario that included temperature. Since most automotive companies test their prototype vehicles in the desert near Emerson’s Embedded Computing headquarters in Arizona, where summer temperatures often exceed 110ºF (whew!), we used the same environment to demonstrate the system’s ability to withstand extreme temperatures.

 

We used an M561 Gama Goat vehicle for our somewhat unscientific, but nevertheless interesting test. The Gama Goat is a six-wheel drive, semi- articulated vehicle that was widely used by the US military from the 1960s to 1980s. It has exceptional off-road manoeuvrability while generating incredible amounts of noise and fumes from its rather environmentally unfriendly diesel engine!

 

We mounted one of our standard PrAMC7210 AMCs, based on the Intel Core 2 Duo processor and a physical AMC hard disk inside a ruggedized MicroTCA enclosure from Hybricon. Running a standard OS, the processor AMC was set up to capture video from an external webcam connected via a USB port. The ruggedized Air Transport Rack (ATR) was physically bolted to the roof of the Gama Goat using some metal brackets along with the webcam, which was positioned to show the ATR box in the foreground with the environment in the background.

 

We hit a temporary problem with applying power to the system; due to time limitations and availability of connectors we couldn’t make use of the rugged connectors on the front of the ATR box. We had to run cables directly into the top of the box, which meant we had to leave the lid off, mitigating any cooling effect of the forced air fans and instead exposing the AMC boards to the full effect of the sun.

 

I’m not sure who was the hottest: the driver of the Gama Goat, the camera team who had to climb the desert hills with their equipment or the AMC modules. Either way, they all survived and as you can see from the video clip, the Intel AMC board recorded some great footage. Since we’ve now recovered, we’re looking for the next idea to show off a MicroTCA system………..ideas on a postcard please?

 

A snippet of the full video in WMV format can be downloaded from the resources section at http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-1990

0 Comments Permalink
0

… and there was a parallel bus, which was fast and effective. But as time passed and speed increased, the poor old parallel bus could not keep up and next generation serial solutions started to appear. At the same time, new processors with increased capability, capacity and performance arrived, but required much more power than before. Supplying the power and cooling for these new technologies was becoming an issue.

 

As people looked forward, they saw that the current solutions were inadequate to support the new performance requirements. Additionally, the advent of the packet based network, deprecation of custom designs and the dawn of COTS infrastructure were all considered as they designed a new specification to meet those new requirements. And so, ATCA was born.

 

Designed for the next generation packet based networks with NEBS compliance as its basis, ATCA is a serial based solution with large blades that can provide the power and cooling support the new CPUs needed. The base specification covers power distribution (aligned with central office needs), management structure, managed field replaceable units, interconnect performance, flexibility, expansion and redundancy to name a few.

 

Now, at the time, there were many possibilities of how these blades could be interconnected. With Infiniband, PCIe/ASI, sRIO, Hypertransport and (of course) Ethernet as possibilities, there were a number of strong candidates. Therefore, the ATCA specification was structured to allow these to be applied as dot specs, additional overlays on the base specification to provide the required customisations for handling the protocol. In hindsight, it would have been easier to pick one, of course, but at the time it was not an easy choice. Today, it is easy to see that Ethernet has become the king of backplane interconnects for ATCA and has driven a strong and flourishing ATCA eco-system. The other interconnect standards are now being used more for onboard interconnect and specialised applications.

 

With ATCA now firmly established as a key solution for telecommunication equipment manufacturers – some of whom even base their standard platform strategy on the open standard – it is imperative that we focus our attention on the future of ATCA. In coming blogs, I will look at several aspects of the push toward new technologies and the next generation of ATCA.

0 Comments Permalink
0

…. when you’re just back from vacation, reading this blog and wondering how you’re going to architect your next project. You’ll have heard of AdvancedTCA and MicroTCA but are they suitable? Maybe your application is not telecom related but does have a communication aspect?

 

Well, for a relatively minor outlay there are a number of events coming up that will enable you to see the rapidly expanding range of Intel x86 based processor AMCs and xTCA systems available. In addition to tabletop exhibitions where you actually get to see and touch the products, you can talk to the technical experts. These events tend to have comprehensive speaking programs covering a variety of compelling topics from keynotes and industry perspectives to detailed technical workshops.

 

MicroTCA Conference 2008, September 24th at Reading, UK http://www.mtcacon-uk.com/

 

ATCA/uTCA Special Focus Workshop as part of the 2008 Nuclear Science Symposium, October 18-19th at Dresden, Germany, http://www.nss-mic.org/2008/NSSMain.asp

 

AdvancedTCA Summit featuring MicroTCA, October 21-23rd at Santa Clara, CA, USA, http://www.advancedtcasummit.com/ Rose Schooler, General Manager of Intel’s Performance Products Division in the Embedded Computing Group will be giving a keynote on Network 2015 along with other industry luminaries such as our own Shlomo Pri-Tal.

 

Embedded Conference Scandinavia 2008, October 21-22nd at Stockholm, Sweden, http://www.embeddedconference.se/index.php?Itemid=47

 

If you want to learn more about xTCA and AMC technology, then attending one of these events can be a very effective use of your time. While I’d like to think you’d come straight to the Emerson Network Power booth, the best thing about all these shows is the diversity of content you will see. There are an amazing number of modules, carriers, systems and other assorted building blocks available today, and it is possible to construct many more solutions off the shelf for fast prototyping and development.

 

There is one other event worth mentioning, although it is not open to the public, and that is the latest Advanced Interoperability Workshop (AIW) which is being held in Germany during September. The AIW gives engineers the chance to do detailed interop between all the elements of a system including the chassis, power modules, processors and switches and enables them to iron out any issues before making these products available to the public. At some point in the future, the Communications Platform Trade Association www.cp-ta.org will formally certify products. Meanwhile, the work of the AIW continues to make AMC ‘plug and play’ a reality in most instances.

 

Have a great summer and perhaps I’ll see you at one of these events!

0 Comments Permalink
0

We in the embedded industry like to slice and dice markets by application, technology, customers, and any other way that tells a story. When we look at ATCA as a server offering we have to ask ourselves "why ATCA?" and what features make it attractive in certain applications and unattractive in others. Part of my role is to ask this question of the industry and drive action based on the answer. Since telecom equipment providers defined the standard, there's clearly a fit in that market. But what about other markets? What I am increasingly seeing is that ATCA fits into applications that provide mission critical services, are bill-per-minute, or address security or highly secure communications.

 

At least two of these characteristics apply to government and military communications. In addition to servicing mission critical and highly secure communications, designers of military and government networks need to leverage commercial technologies while maintaining the ability to meet the unique needs of the military. ATCA is a highly available, yet off-the-shelf technology. (One major telecom equipment provider recently reported to us that they have had zero downtime to date in its first generation ATCA deployments. ) It has centralized, redundant management based on the IPMI standard and the ability for multi-shelf management. System monitoring and failure detection are built-in and automated. ATCA has highly flexible I/O capability and broad processor choices which enable it to meet both legacy and next-generation networking needs with the same system. It is relatively rugged, having been designed to meet NEBS, and therefore is much closer to military requirements than commercial servers. Will government and military markets be the next big win for ATCA?

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
0

One of the subjects I’m most interested in is how MicroTCA and AMC modules are evolving to open up opportunities in lower cost spaces such as the enterprise and industrial markets.

 

As many people know, the AMC specifications were driven out of the need for hot swappable mezzanines for ATCA blades. The MicroTCA specification was kicked off based on the belief that by plugging the AMCs into a backplane wrapped by a smaller enclosure that the AMC market would be greatly expanded. One of the more contentious issues in the specification discussion was about potential cost targets. At the time, it must have been difficult to imagine how new integrated devices such as the Intel Atom processor would drive system level pricing down when combined with lower cost packaging and other optimizations. Now, a couple of years after the MicroTCA specification was ratified, I am often amazed by some of the applications for which potential customers are thinking of using MicroTCA systems. Maybe I shouldn’t be so surprised, as I started my own career by using open standards-based boards for embedded applications, but that’s another story.

 

Back to the subject, one question I’ve been asked is whether it is possible to remove some of the built-in AMC features such as hot swap, in order to save cost. Most of these questions come from people who have legacy hardware and who believe that hot swap particularly is not of any use to them. I suppose a typical application might be in industrial automation where the system is controlling and/or monitoring a process. Typically, to carry out maintenance the controller is switched off, as well as the equipment or production line, so there is no need for hot swap and therefore it appears irrelevant.

 

As industrial automation becomes more complex, I have seen installations that are complex to shut down and take a long time. Having the ability to add an additional module on the fly, even if only for troubleshooting, can be extremely beneficial.

 

I have also started to see a few instances where one MicroTCA box is used for more than a single function. For example, the ability to add an additional Intel-based processor for monitoring or server functionality without requiring all the existing modules to be powered off is extremely useful. The idea of upgrading these embedded systems while live seems to be gaining a bit of momentum, especially now that other techniques such as virtualization have started to break the mental barrier that one module does a single task in one box.

 

If anyone has similar views on how they envisage hot swapping to be used I would be interested to hear.

0 Comments Permalink
1

At the end of May I had the opportunity to present at the MicroTCA Summit which took place in Chantilly Virginia. This is the premier opportunity for vendors, customers and other interested parties to get together for a few days to review product and adoption progress for the increasingly popular MicroTCA standard. For those who are not familiar with MicroTCA, it is an open standard using mainly postcard sized modules in a rack system. What makes MicroTCA different is that the underlying management and connectivity are derived from the highly robust AdvancedTCA standard and so enjoys an IP centric control architecture with the flexibility to add additional fabric interfaces to suit applications.

 

MicroTCA is a relatively new standard (it was ratified mid 2006) and there are still many opportunities for education. Like all new standards, one key question is whether the necessary building blocks are available and will work easily together – after all one of the key tenets of an open standard is that it allows customers to pick and mix components to get a best in class solution.

 

The highlight for me, and also many visitors judging by the comments I heard was the multi-vendor interop workshop. Consisting of 4 different chassis and a multitude of AMC modules, this was one of the first public demonstrations of the growing confidence and maturity in this standard. All the chassis and modules were managed by the Spiderware M3 product from Emerson Network Power to graphically show the element status and other detailed information whilst the AMC modules were running video streaming applications.

 

As a vendor, we always like to demonstrate our own latest and greatest products and I’m sure we’ll continue to do that. However, we shouldn’t lose sight of the real value to our customers of choosing an open standard architecture like MicroTCA that interoperates correctly and so I expect that this will be a model for future coopetition.

1 Comments Permalink