Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > Intel® vPro™ Expert Center > Blog > 2009 > July > 01
Currently Being Moderated
2

To Chuck or Not To Chuck that Old Computer…

Posted by Scott Smith on Jul 1, 2009 6:39:34 PM

You’re a small businessperson, and the office computer guy (who actually knows nothing about computers, but was selected because he successfully hooked up a game console to his TV last Christmas) tells you that two of your 10 office PCs are down with viruses or “something,” bringing a halt to a customer proposal that’s on deadline. Two others in accounting keep pausing long enough for workers to take coffee breaks while the systems mull over their keystrokes, pushing the billing process into overtime. Revenue is at a standstill.

“What are my options?” you ask. “We could maybe buy some stuff to upgrade them, and call in a computer repair service,” the computer guy shrugs. Buying new computers in the economic downturn seems a questionable call. The computers are only three or four years old and likely you could get another year or two out of them.

Nonetheless, while you’re small, these decisions aren’t just about survival and cutting back spending. They’re about remaining competitive and having an edge when the Dow Jones climbs for real. And the business doesn’t run without computers. So, what do you tell your computer guy?

OK, I’m an Intel PR guy, so you know where this is going. Nonetheless, bare with me for a bit and there might be some ROI. Rob Crooke, VP for Intel’s Business Client Group, recently tackled some of the key questions around this dilemma in conjunction with a press briefing on a new study by Techaisle. The study looks at the financial aspects of maintaining computers for SMBs.

Here’s what the Techaisle study says: The average maintenance cost for a small business on a computer that’s more than three years old is $545. On the average, that includes $326 for maintenance, $99 for those upgrades you’re considering and $120 for out-of-warranty service costs. If you bought the extended warranty, reduce the latter. If you buy a new computer, the maintenance cost drops to $126, the first-year maintenance cost from a study by Jack Gold (Techaisle doesn’t provide a first-year cost.) So, the difference is $419.

“Yeah, sure,” you say, “but I have to buy a new computer!” Yes, but let’s see how that $419 might cut the pain. PDS has Intel Core2 Duo-based desktop PCs starting at $540 and CDW offers notebooks beginning at $700. If you add Intel vPro for additional manageability and security, you could move up for $699 and $830, respectively. So, you can buy the new desktop system for as low as $121, a 15-month payback. Now, if you’re larger than small, say 50-100 employees, you can see from the chart below that the payback is less than a year, and will actually make you a $40 profit. OK, OK, I’m a PR guy, but cut me some slack. I’m not making up the numbers.

Money Foil.jpg

Now that’s just the hard dollars that Techaisle captured. A new PC can have other benefits – reduced downtime from viruses, improved energy efficiency and enhanced productivity to name a few. So, maybe investing a few dollars could save you money in the slightly longer run and possibly help you keep your revenue flowing.

For more information, you might want to look at the Techaisle study. For a quicker overview check out the fact sheet and white paper, or better see the media briefing with Rob Crooke, ASUSTeK and Gigabyte.



Add a comment Leave a comment on this blog post.
Jul 2, 2009 2:37 AM Guest goldfries  says:

Reduced downtime from viruses is not about the age of the PC, it's about the competency of the people who are using it and those who are maintaining it.

 

A 5 year-old print server that does nothing else but print sharing is still not likely to get any virus, compared to a 1 month old notebook under the hands of a person who cares not where he / she clicks.

 

Looking at the article, it's all about dollars and cents - but what about the time and hassle to find the product and configuring it to replace the supposed to-be-replaced unit?

 

While we look at monetary benefits, let's consider the manpower - how much $$$ is an hour worth of manpower to the company? You'll still need to get someone COMPETENT enough to know what to buy, after that comes the configuration part (if any), and of course if the new is replacing the old, there will be downtime and could possibly have hiccups. And if there's no competent staff to handle the transition, cost could be involved for calling up the experts to aid the transition.

 

So in the event that the old units were replaced - what do you do with them? Sell them I suppose, but selling involves the time and manpower, the effort to put it on sale and all. Keep them as backup? If that is so, why replace them to begin with?

 

In my opinion, while things may seem nice in monetary terms, do consider the non-monetary factors. It's not as SIMPLE as it is.

 

And lastly - seeing that this is an Intel blog, I would expect better spacing between paragraphs. Reading a wall of text is certainly uncomfortable.

Jul 2, 2009 6:53 AM Guest Daniel Silvestre  says:

This is hard to believe. Well, you are a PR guy and probably don't use the "alternative"  technology. If a guy like this ask me the same question, I would propose a solution that will optimize energy utilization, eliminate viruses problems and improve performance dramatically without the need for new hardware. Besides that, he would probably save some cash with licenses and related stuff. Of course, I would suggest to fire his computer guy  (and hire one from my crew).  Here in Brazil most small business simply don't enjoy all the potential of its IT because who sells the solution is usually unable to tune it to the real need of the business, at least for an affordable cost. And that's exactly why guys like me have small successfull consulting IT companies.