Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > The Server Room > Blog > Tags > xeon_5500
1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous Next

The Server Room Blog

81 Posts tagged with the xeon_5500 tag
0

I wrote a while back about how the Xeon 7400(Dunnington) processor series compared to RISC. Since then I have shared information through other blog posts and sharing content about how Xeon 7400 and Xeon 5500 will compare to both SPARC and POWER.

 

Xeon 7400 and Xeon 5500 are the current products shipping into the marketplace today. I.M.H.O they offer a pretty compelling alternative from both a performance and TCO perspective Vs SPARC and POWER. But I will not try and repeat all the reasons here

 

What I wanted to share with you was some thoughts about what the next product to succeed Xeon 7400 will bring to the RISC party. Nehalem-EX is the code-name for our next generation of product designed to serve workloads currently serviced by Xeon 7400 today (i.e. Database, ERP,  BI etc). EX btw is what we all would traditionally call MP or multi processor servers

 

Don't stop reading now, here is why I'm EXCITED about what Nehalem-EX will bring to the RISC party.

My excitement is actually based on real customer discussions about what Nehalem-EX will do for them and why it delivers some new stuff (my code for features and benefits) which they see as a pre-requisite to make the move from RISC to Xeon. For some customers the TCO and performance of  products have been enough to convince them to move. For some other customers there are still some checkboxes remaining which I believe Nehalem-EX will address

Here is a snapshot of some of the cool new stuff which is actually convincing customers (from some real deals that I have worked)

    1. Improved bandwidth. Up to 9 times memory bandwidth of previous generations
    2. Introduction of Quickpath Interconnects to the EX systems
    3. Add new RAS features previously seen on Itanium products to Xeon products
    4. Significant improvement in performance vs previous generations e.g. Database 2.5xe
    5. More scalable platforms through 8 OEMs offering >8S. These platforms are key to manage large databases and for large scale consolidation
    6. Mainframe class availability in scalable platforms

 

For more information check out the press briefing from May. See more the details in the presentation

 

 

 

Nehalem-EX goes into production later this year and I am pretty excited about how it will change the game. What do you think?

0 Comments Permalink
0

Mike Lafferty (Intel) demonstrates the Xeon 5500 Processor series, code-named Nehalem. Check out the video....

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
0

Competition, Comparison, Self Improvement, Benchmarking.

 

We do them in business. We do them in our careers. We do them in our leisure. ... and if you are like me you like to watch them on TV or live as well. Who is watching Lance Armstrong? or Tiger Woods? or their favorite sports team compete regularly.


IT professionals are no different.  Today, one of the business emhpasis points for IT is energy efficiency.  Now there is a way for you to quickly compare your own IT organization against itself and others.  This IT self-assessment tool takes about 2-3 minutes to complete and will answer these three questions


  1. How efficient is your server infrastructure today?
  2. How do you compare to your peers?
  3. How much more efficient could you be?


The Community Window: Server Efficiency is a tool hosted on the Intel Premier IT Professionals website (http://ipip.intel.com) where registration is free and so is the information and best practices shared by other IT professionals throughout the industry.  Join and conduct your Server Efficiency self assessment today.   Chris

server efficiency tool.bmp

0 Comments Permalink
0

As I've blogged before, my job takes me to many places and I get see all kinds of cool technology when I get there. This example is no exception, I've put together a short video with Steve Cumings of HP showing a tour of the Performance Optimized DataCenter or abbreviated as "POD". Its actually the same size as a standard container for shipping anywhere around the world. These type of assets are vital in time of need such as disaster recovery. Take a look and let us know how you could use this cool technology.

 

0 Comments Permalink
0

Your most valuable employee is the one that creates tomorrow’s successes.  Providing them tools that help them do that faster will help your organization create new products or optimize old ones more rapidly.  The benefit to the organization is increased opportunities to win the customer’s attention via new products or your responsiveness to their request; the employee gets to brag on what he or she just helped bring to market.

Before we get too far let’s look at Intel’s mission with respect to workstations.  We are laser focused on supplying technology that provides users with an uncompromised experience in transforming their ideas into reality.  With that in mind we look at how users create; we try understanding their obstacles and work with the ecosystem of hardware and software providers to deliver solutions to real problems that may be inhibiting their opportunity to innovate.  

One technology that is helping users innovate faster is virtualization. 

No, we are not looking to remove the workstation from the user’s desk or share his or her workstation with peers, who also need a workstation.  We are using virtualization to deliver the performance they need to innovate faster.

The Observation

We saw workstation user’s innovation slow as they multitasked between tasks – some of them not even theirs.  The involuntary tasks included deploying IT security patches, updates, and system backups to name a few.  We also saw that users were no longer just doing Computer Aided Design (CAD) alone, but they were doing CAD, using productivity tools, meshing, web surfing for supporting facts, collaborating via video and Instant Messaging (IM) tools, digital white boarding and trying to do analysis-driven design.  They were very busy people who can’t afford any downtime or slow time.

In some cases we noticed that some users actually had not one, but two or more workstations running in completely different environments, many times with different OSs.

The Problem

What the above really lead to is a conclusion that too many tasks were going after too few resources and that the experience we had hoped the user would encounter was not happening.  In fact the reverse was happening – interactive creative tasks were slowing, system sluggishness was at an all time high.  The “uncompromised experience in transforming their ideas into reality” we wanted for a workstation user was not there and any innovation that was possible was slowed down to a crawl.

A Potential Solution

Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (Intel VT-d), once just thought of for servers actually has a place in the workstation market. 

This technology provides an important step toward enabling a significant set of emerging usage models in the workstation. VT-d support on Intel platforms provides the capability to ensure improved isolation of I/O resources for greater reliability, security, and availability.  That is a mouth full let’s see it in action.

There are two key requirements that are common across workstation usage models.

1.       The first requirement is protected access to I/O resources from a given virtual machine (VM), such that it cannot interfere with the operation of another VM on the same platform. This isolation between VMs is essential for achieving availability, reliability, and trust. This helps you get the performance you want from your workstation.

2.       The second major requirement is the ability to share I/O resources among multiple VMs. In many cases, it is not practical or cost-effective to replicate I/O resources (such as storage or network controllers) for each VM on a given platform.

In the case of the workstation, virtualization can be used to create a self-contained operating environment, or "virtual software appliance[RC1] ," that is dedicated to capabilities such as manageability or security. These capabilities generally need protected and secure access to a network device to communicate with down-the-wire management agents and to monitor network traffic for security threats. For example, a security agent within a VM requires protected access to the actual network controller hardware. This agent can then intelligently examine network traffic for malicious payloads or suspected intrusion attempts before the network packets are passed to the guest OS, where user applications might be affected. Workstations can also use this technique for management, security, content protection, and a wide variety of other dedicated services. The type of service deployed may dictate that various types of I/O resources, graphics, network, and storage devices, be isolated from the OS where the user's applications are running.

The Result

In collaborating with virtualization and automation leader, Parallels, on its Parallels Workstation Extreme solution,  we identified two impediments to workstation user productivity.  The first was the issue around general resource overhead that afflict a traditional virtualized workstation system due to  insufficient resources to address the overload of requests. The second issue explored includes the more complex problem of a single workstation with the need to support multiple OSs and display visualization programs at near- or full-performance within virtualized machines.

The first issue was more straightforward - create VMs, partition resources and now the user has a very resilient workstation that is capable of delivering the intended experience.  IT can have their VMs and the user has his or her workstation back and the concept of digital prototyping to create and explore a complete product before it is built is a reality.  The creative innovator in the company can now iterate through more ideas in less time and your company created more opportunities to catch the customer’s attention just went through the roof.

The second issue offered a more complex challenge.  We identified certain industries such as the oil and gas exploration space where users actually had two or more physical workstations - one running Windows, the other running Linux. Both workstations had visual display requirements by the end user and both computers acted on the same reservoir data with applications that while similar in many ways, were still different in their functionalities and purpose.  In oil drilling projects that typically involve millions of dollars in capital investment, the confirmation of expected end results is an asset that far outweigh the costs of a few workstations. Nevertheless, in today’s economic setting, the ability to get the same functionalities at a lower cost is one of many key drivers in helping companies achieve healthy bottom lines.

The Proof Point For Virtualization In A Workstation Engineers from Schlumberger, a leading oil field service provider, run performance-demanding applications such as GeoFrame* and Petrel*.  These applications serve to analyze complex geological and geophysical data and determine the viability of potential reservoirs, or to optimize production at existing sites. With GeoFrame running on Linux* and Petrel on Microsoft Windows*, Schlumberger engineers have been using these applications on two separate physical workstations, driving IT spending higher, pushing down user productivity and increasing both power consumption and IT maintenance costs.

A New Paradigm For A New Day

With the availability of Intel Xeon processor 5500 series-based workstations, game-changing workstation virtualization software such as Parallels Workstation Extreme has opened up new horizons with breakthrough graphics performance with Intel’s latest processor technology. Parallels Workstation Extreme is built on top of the Parallels FastLane Architecture that effectively leverages the full potential of hardware resources such as graphics and networking cards to offer optimal workstation performance.

In comparison testing, Schlumberger compared the concurrent performance of applications running side-by-side on a virtualized Intel Xeon processor 5400 series-based workstation with the same setup on the newer Intel Xeon processor 5500-based machine. The results were astounding. The first machine with the older processor without Intel-VT-d support ran Petrel on the host OS at full native speed, but performance for GeoFrame in a VM slowed enormously. While Petrel refreshed its graphics at a rate of 30 frames per second, GeoFrame crawled along at a graphics refresh rate of JUST one frame every 19 seconds, an agonizingly slow performance on an older workstation without Intel VT-d support.

When the group tested the same applications on the newer Xeon 5500 series workstation with Intel VT-d support, the results were striking: Both applications – Petrel running on the host OS and GeoFrame in a guest OS in a VM - ran at full native speed, and both were able to refresh graphics at near 30 frames per second—a 570 times improvement over the first workstation.

Russ Sagert, Schlumberger’s Geoscience Technical Advisor for North America said “our engineers were blown away by the performance. We hammered these machines with extreme workloads that stressed every aspect of the system. Amazingly, the new workstation based on the Intel Xeon processor 5500 series provided performance enabling this multiple OS, multiple application environment for the first time.”

The key element in Schlumberger’s new environment is Intel Xeon processor 5500 series-based workstations with Intel® Virtualization Technology (Intel® VT) for Directed I/O (Intel® VT-d).  Together, these technologies enable direct assignment of graphics and network cards to virtual machines, enabling the machine to circumvent the interrupt and exit loop and clearing the previous performance problems.

Running in conjunction with Parallels Workstation Extreme, which effectively leverages Intel Virtualization Technology, including VT-d, the solution revolutionizes virtualization for high-end users. “High-performance virtualization on Intel Xeon processor 5500 series-based workstations is a game-changing capability,” says Sagert. “We can allocate multiple cores, up to 64 GB of memory and a dedicated graphics card to each machine. The results are spectacular.”

In the final analysis, moving to the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 series of next-generation workstations does far more than cut costs. It impacts the way that work gets done. If you have clients running the kind of resource-intensive, graphics-rich applications that traditionally slow to a crawl in a virtualized environment, consider the benefits of finally moving beyond the I/O barrier.

A fully configured Intel Xeon Processor 5500 series-based workstation running Parallels Workstation Extreme delivers the performance level that makes a virtualized workstation a leading contender for users with multi-workstation requirements. A streamlined work interface, reduced office noise and clutter, access to the same data repository and significant performance gains works on the user side. But the IT organization also gains benefits by lowering capital, management, support, provisioning, data protection, space, and energy and cooling costs.

Moreover, the IT team can now standardize on a single OS image while addressing alternative requirements.

Learn More

Intel Workstation Processors http://www.intel.com/products/workstation/processors/index.htm

Parallels Workstation Extreme

http://www.parallels.com/products/extreme


#

[RC1]To distinguish from the hardware appliance breed

0 Comments Permalink
1

I have been around the supercomputing market for over 25 years and have had an opportunity to see some interesting ideas come and go.  Let me share two that I experienced firsthand. 

·         CDC’s Cyber205 or a Cray 1S.  The CRAY-IS and the CDC Cyber 205 both offered effective vector processing, however, code conversion between them may have required some significant algorithmic changes. Cray of course won the HPC race at that time.  Note, the Cyber 205 was a tremendous performer, when you could keep their extreme.ly long vector pipeline busy. However, one branch or gap in the vector processing pipeline would cause a flush of the vector unit and what performance advantage you appeared to have vs. a Cray 1S was quickly erased.

·         An early day accelerator was Floating Point Systems.  In particular the FPS 164 was an awesome “off load” system where the needs of a few users were satisfied with better throughput than the Cray X-MP and Y-MP of the day. Convex, had a better idea.  It was better at serving the needs of more than an FPS 164 and was simpler to develop, maintain and scale software to next generation systems.

So what are the lessons from history? Perhaps it is that there it is there is a tight connection between application, architectures and algorithms and that it is extremely important to maintain a level of application flexibility and versatility in order to adopt new architectures as they become available in the market.  The old adage still remains true, software will outlive the useful life of hardware.  So it is important to be able to quickly adapt new shifts.

The same questions probably still apply today as they did when Cray, CDC and FPS were around.

When does an accelerator computing strategy work best?

The easiest answer is if your application is extremely data parallel in nature, then it may be well suited for an accelerator strategy. The word extremely is the critical part. 

If your application only performs some level of data parallelism and includes task, thread and cluster level parallelism or contains a small fraction of branching or is host to irregular data sizes, then perhaps an accelerator may not be the best fit.

How much real performance will an accelerator strategy deliver? 

Often times we hear claims of 10X, 20X or even greater than 30X. 

These are great headlines, but as many have noted, you need to understand an accelerators impact on the total execution time of your application.  What may have been 10X to 30X or more on a kernel of the application may only deliver a mere 2X to 3X or even less in terms of total application performance improvement.

Of course the real question is what are we really comparing performance speed ups to?

I have seen well tuned software on accelerators compared to “baseline” code running on one core of an old processor.  However, when you use available software technology and turn compiler flags on and add in a math kernel library call the performance on multi-core solutions can jump by over 10X and in some cases can exceed 30X multiples for total execution time.  This standards based accelerated software will scale forward as newer microarchitectures are made available from Intel.

Why is the difference between the promise and the actual performance so great? 

Always a good questionJ. 

The promise deals with a small part or a kernel of the software that is data parallel and can potentially scale linearly as more compute resources are added.  Again if the application is extremely data parallel, then an accelerator strategy may be the correct approach.

However, when the actual performance result, or total application performance, is significantly different it is often because of several things. 

·         One common reason is that you may be comparing optimized software on multi-core systems to optimized software on an accelerator.  When I compare similarly optimized software on a multi-core system I see that 20 – 30X difference often fades to less than 2X  and in most cases better than hardware accelerators.  This is because optimized software on a multi-core solution accelerates all components of the application.

·         Another situation is the bandwidth imbalance of the attach points of the accelerators, typically the attach speeds do not match the memory bandwidth or the ALU speed on the accelerators and the theoretical peak flops are tough to achieve.  Sometimes, for larger workloads due to limited amount of memory on the accelerator card, performance deteriorates.

·         Another situation may be that your application depends on different forms of parallelism which include task, thread or cluster level parallelism and even in some cases sequential forms of your software

So back to the differences in performance between the Cray 1 and CDC Cyber 205.

While Cyber 205 was great at edges of science the Cray proved to be the workhorse of high performance computing.  It offered better system balance than the Cyber 205.  Here is an example, if you take great care to optimize your software for a particular architecture you will no doubt see tremendous performance gains.  However, like the Cyber 205, if you break that pipeline you need to pay for the overhead to restart the long vector pipeline.  Often times, even with today’s accelerators, that start up cost reduces what appears to be stellar performance gains of the Cyber 205 to being no better than, or sometimes, even slower than the Cray 1.  There were of course examples with the Cyber 205, as there is today with accelerators that demonstrate where select sciences can see tremendous advantages over traditional computing solutions.

What other considerations may weigh in your decision to adopt an accelerator strategy?

Are you constantly refining your software?
Many researchers would probably answer yes.  They are constantly refining their software to improve the results the performance or both.

As I mentioned at the beginning of the blog, the old adage still remains true, software will outlive the useful life of hardware.  So it is important to be able to quickly adapt to new shifts.  One way to simplify these moves is to use standards based tools which can give you the flexibility to create applications that can use the multiple types of parallelism mentioned above via tools, compilers, and libraries.  You may also want to use standards based tools to acquire the versatility you need in order to scale your software across multiple architectures – e.g. large, many and heterogeneous cores. 

The caveat with respect to using non standard tools is that you become locked into a specific architecture.  If that architecture from the same vendor would happen to change, you may be required to make some significant changes (e.g. tuning to grain sizes).

Do you want to maintain, support and update multiple code bases?
I don’t.  I want to invest n the development of parallel algorithms.  The old adage is that software will far out live any hardware implementation still applies and I need the flexibility and versatility to quickly and as painlessly as possible be able to adopt new architectures as they are made available.  I do not want to invest in maintaining, supporting and updating an ever increasing set of code streams as newer architectures are made available.

Our team goal at Intel is to develop software tools and hardware technology that can help you scale-forward your application performance to future platforms without requiring a massive rebuild – just drop-in a new runtime that is optimized for the new platform to experience the improvement (akin to the printer/display driver model, buy a new printer/display, install the respective driver, and your system enjoys improved benefits).  That is the goal.

If you want to learn more about what we are doing to deliver high performing HPC solutions that are both flexible and versatile please visit www.intel.com/go/hpc

1 Comments Permalink
0

I’m here this week in familiar stomping grounds, the Moscone Center, in San Francisco. Today’s event started off strong with John Chambers keynote address. His speech was very engaging as he wandered through the audience, capturing the attention of nearly 10K attendees. What caught my eye especially was his focus on collaboration and Web2.0. The example he used was the recent launch of the Cisco Unified Computing Solution (UCS) which was launched via online tools such as blogs, telepresence, and flicker, check out this photo:

IT-Web20 Enabling Cisco.JPG

This shows that the virtual launch reached 10x the audience at 1/10th the cost! I am really glad to hear that since this is what I do for a living.

John also spoke about some emerging technologies and I found out that Cisco has been working very closely with the Dallas Cowboys on increasing the customer experience. I was a little disappointed to hear John is a Niners fan, but had to expect that coming from a man and a company that was named after San Fran’cisco’, so I give him a break on that one.

Cowboys.JPG

It was also very interesting to hear a bit about the history of the Cisco logo, looks like times have changed and so has the logo:

logo.JPG

After the keynote, I caught up with John and Kirk Skaugen, Executive Vice President with Intel’s Digital Enterprise Group at the Intel booth where Kirk had a surprise. Intel presented to Cisco and John a XEON 5500 processor series wafer (code named Nehalem).

kirk_john_1.JPG

Here’s another shot with a the XEON 5500 wafer:

Kirk-John Cisco Live.JPG

I’ll being covering more of the event and participating in social media events during the event. Look for future updates here in the Server Room.

Wm. Hank Lea

0 Comments Permalink
0

Did you know that using an electricity rate of 11.4 cents per kWh provides a simple method of calculating annual electricity cost of any device?

 

1 watt of power consumption, with an electricity rate of 11.4 cents per kWh, cost $1 per year, assuming power usage remains constant.  Also, as a general rule of thumb, every 1W of device power consumption in a data center requires an additional 1 watt for overhead power (Source: Intel IT). So a device that consumes 1W actually consumes 2W of power at a data center level.


Here's the math:  1 Watt power * 8760 hours per year / 1000 * $0.114 electricity rate per kWh = $1 per year.  This math holds the same for any currency, Euro, Yuan, etc.  11.4 cents per kWh is the crossover point…and as electricity rates increase over 11.4 cents, 1 watt will cost more than a $1 per year. 

The datacenter overhead power, often referred to as Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) is a number which has emerged as the leading metric for data center energy efficiency.


You might say that 1W = $2 annually doesn't sound like much, but start doing the math for 1000 servers that consume 200W in a data center with a PUE of 2.0 which works out to annual electricity cost of ~$400,000 per year.  Now, for every 1 watt the server power consumption is reduced, this would translate into $2000 annual savings.  Note, this is a very rudimentary example, but it is useful to illustrate why customers are really starting to focus on power as one of their key purchase decisions.

    

If you need energy efficient servers, there are multiple server vendors currently have some exceptional energy efficient products based on Intel(R) Xeon(R) 5500 processors.  And looking forward, we are also actively working on how to reduce power of the processor and at the system level for the upcoming generations of products.


Here’s some good reference on electricity rates:

For United States, state by state electricity rate comparison

For Europe, 1st half of 2008 rate comparison by country.


Remember, power is one purchase decision, but it is not the only one.  A rack of servers that consumes less power that does less work isn't an efficient way of deploying servers either.  Ensure that the performance vector is considered.  Intel® Xeon® 5500 processor based servers provid exceptional performance and perf/watt leadership over the competition.


Quick question for you:  How does electricity rate of 11.4 cents per kWh and a data center PUE of 2.0 compare to your data center? 

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
0

The computer industry is filled with pundits, speculators, visionaries, salesman, brilliant architects and professors. Each provides invaluable insight into their experience, their intelligence, their alma mater, their ticker symbol, their ego and what’s next. Some win the “what’s next lottery”, others work for years of brilliance in relative obscurity.

Seemingly, a world that has deployed over 1 Billion devices a year for the last 3 years , is incapable of understanding the gravity of a new programming models, a new hardware architecture, a sleek new design that delivers on a vision that Gene Rodenberry thought of in the 1960’s or Da Vinci in the 15th Century. What is old is new…..and let me tell you why? It will revolutionize the industry (not evolutionize…a term reserved for slower growing industry’s that require government assistant every decade or so…), transform your environment and provide freedoms you had only hoped to enjoy….and we invented it 40 years ago. Does any of this sound familiar?

It should. These are the paraphrased slogans of an industry in transition. Real products matters, product differentiation matters, standards matter, interoperability matters….and shareholders pay for future expectations.

The future of computing…is NOW. The future of the computer industry is NOW. The next generation of computer programming, software architectures and transformational technologies is NOW. As an industry we have finally begun to embrace interface, architectural and software programming standards to usher in a new era of interoperability and scalability. Behind us are the days of “proprietary interfaces” (What does that actually mean other than I am going to sell you some extra accessories that will be worthless in 2 years?), which do not provide a differentiated performance/cost advantage. Gone are the days of developing programming languages that lock-in customers to individual companies, whether vendors innovate or not. These rules of the past are slowly melting away, allowing the entire industry to embrace interoperability and standards at the highest level in history. Industry diversity is healthy and insures that the most innovative and technologically relevant companies will “win” most of the time. Allowing the 1 Billion and the Next Billion customers of the world to enjoy the best interface technology yet developed….each other.  It also provides us with a unique ability to move to the next phase in our dynamic industry’s growth, autonomic instrumentation.

At Intel, we are constantly working to develop the next great performance architecture, filled with new innovative “goodies”, as our Chief Virtualization Architect Rich Uhlig calls them. These “goodies” (a technical term that Rich borrowed from his nephew, I believe) come in the form of virtualization technologies (Intel VT-x, Intel VT-d and Intel VT-c), security technologies (Intel LT-SX), performance technologies (Hyper-Threading, Turbo Boost) and energy efficiency instrumentation (Node Manager and Data Center Manager). Soon they will also include differentiated services in the cloud which facilitate ease of use and growth for a host of vertical industries in need of innovation. The resulting architectures that emerge will be instrument rich, feature capable and as scalable as users are willing to pay for.

Why is this important? Instrumentation matters. As we apply business and personal rules to our growing compute environments it has become increasingly clear that the more tools we make available to users the better informed we are in making decisions. The more disclosure we provide to investors through the use of autonomic programming architectures the more informed they will be of their investing decisions.

How can you day trade $1B in 35 different stocks without clear autonomic controls in your data center, your database, your application and your client devices?

How can you move 450 Million people efficiecntly throughout a country for 2 weeks without autonomic controls on transportation: plains, trains, boats and automobiles, as they do during the Spring Festival in China?

How can you process 1 Billion text messages a day without clear business rules? What happens when these messages are also coming from machines to other machines, modifying databases, applications and clients?

As humans, we must apply guidelines, much like laws,  for our machines to take action when we are asleep, when we are tired, when we are not present, when we are just simply being human….to slow to react to a rapidly changing environment.

The innovators of the computer industry today understand this NOW. We do not need to discuss a vision of 40 years ago without a plan to act NOW. Claiming ideas without action is dishonorable at best, criminal at worst. The innovators of today must build products and services that help solve the problems of today. We do not need to look to 2050 without a plan to act NOW. The visionaries of tomorrow are…..not born. The visionaries of today…can call me in 10 years.

Autonomic controls are in place today, machine to machine computer architectures are here today, scalable compute engines are here today. Are they perfect, no. Are they effective, yes. The design architects, product engineers and systems designers of today need to address these concerns. Autonomic Instrumentation delivers control to the administrator, the user and the developer. Rules engines can be modified to maximize efficiency, minimize consumption and increase productivity. All of these will lead to increase shareholder (read: No just people who buy shares of stock) value across your enterprise, your school, our hospitals, our governments, and your home.

When executed properly, Autonomic controls should be able to deliver 20-25% performance and efficiency increases with each new generation of Moore’s law. In some cases, as in the Intel Xeon® 5500 Series these increases have been over 150% in virtualization performance, these increases will be a combination of software architecture enhancement and silicon optimization. In other cases, it will be through the dedicated hard work of increase instrumentation capability of a processor platform at the same price of the previous generation through energy efficiency and memory controls.

Autonomic controls will also allow end users to avert disasters in our data centers, our homes and in our hands. Autonomic instrumentation design frameworks, allow users to set parameters on data migrations, data backup, security, memory access, power consumption and virtual machine architectures.

For Intel and our new Xeon® 5500 Series processor family, and our recently announced

Intel® Nehalem-EX platform provide the new generation of platform instrumentation. As product developers, designers and architects we should all find a way to increase the tools available to our customers to take advantage of these instrumentation capabilities. I look forward to being able to announce more of these new features as we announce them and help to provide development frameworks for developers, engineers and architects to build new products and services, ushering in the future of autonomic computing innovation…today.

0 Comments Permalink
1

I was out at HP Tech Forum last week and had a chance to catch up on all the latest technology advancements with HP and Intel. What I saw was staggering, over 17 new HP-Intel designs, the HP Performance Optimized Datacenter (POD), and lot's more that I will be sharing with you in coming days as I add more video from the event and help to tell the story if you couldn't be there. First off, I caught up with John McAtee from Intel's HP account team. He was showing a cool demonstration on why now is the right time to invest in XEON 5500 processor series technology. Check out this video and find out how you can start saving in your datacenter today !

 

 

If you want more information on how the XEON 5500 processor series can starting saving in the datacenter, check out this ROI Calculator tool. Also, if you are looking for detailed information or are just looking to gain more knowledge, you can always "Ask The Professor" in our Server Learning Center.

1 Comments Permalink
0

Running multiple Unix environments across a range of locations adds increased complexity and cost to the IT environment. I came across an interesting case study and wanted to highlight some of the key findings

 

YPF SAis the largest company in Argentina operating in the Oil and Gas industry. The company has 29 gas plants around Argentina running different Unix environments such as HP-UX, AIX and Solaris.

 

YPF SA consolidated their SAP ERP and Oracle DB environment from multiple Unix environments to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 with integrated virtualization running on Intel Xeon based platforms from IBM System X

 

Some of the key findings to highlight

  • Key requirement from Unix Administration Team that "migrating from old RISC/Unix and proprietary servers to open and flexible platforms would pose no risk to the reliability, availability and performance of the systems"
  • Positive impact on cost and performance; Lowered costs, simplified management and increased compatibility
  • Reduction in costs especially when compared to license costs of RISC based platforms
  • Increased performance and availability drove decision to scale with RHEL and Xeon
  • Ability to leverage Redhat integrated virtualization. Free up internal hardware and technical resources for other projects

 

 

I guess the combination of Redhat and Intel deliver the business results that customers are seeking. What do you think?

0 Comments Permalink
0

Picture1.jpgAt ISC09, the Top 500* results were announced: 399 out 400, nearly 80%, of the world’s supercomputers are using Intel processors.  The Top500 list is based upon one benchmark, Linpack.  While powering most of the world’s fastest computers is a great endorsement of the role Intel’s technology is playing to help solve the most complex high performance computing problems, no one buys a supercomputing machine just to run Linpack.  Linpack is a kernel that does not necessarily resemble any real application.  It’s just one evaluation vector among many. So, should you demand more?

Yes, look beyond the flops:  look at real application performance or benchmarks that might more closely resemble yours, look at the versatility, and look at ease of deployment of your solution.  

Today, Intel processors deliver more performance and throughput in less space and require less power than ever before.  The Intel® Xeon® 5500 Platform delivers up 3X performance over the previous generation Intel Xeon 5400 to decrease your time to discovery.   The Top500 list has 33 new entries based on the Xeon 5500, which launch only 3 months ago. Intel tools (compilers, libraries, and cluster kits) bring new levels of software versatility by enabling HPC users and ISVs write applications that extract peak performance and scale forward.  The Intel’s Cluster Ready program is easing cluster deployments, increasing reliability and lowering TCO by making it simpler to purchase, deploy and manage an HPC cluster.

So while providing flops is great, don’t forget (and demand) to look at real application performance, ask for software tools and technologies that maximize the value of your HPC system.

Jimmy

*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others

0 Comments Permalink
4

BMW automobiles are known for speed, agility, quality, style and probably some other attributes I’m forgetting. Their IT infrastructure requires the same attributes for them to remain competitive in their industry.

Proactive server refresh, now using Xeon 5500 are part of that equation.  This recent case study outlines how BMWs migration to Xeon 5500 series lowers total cost of ownership and increases flexibility for their business.

Server refresh with Xeon 5500 delivers 30% higher IT performance with 75% less hardware, compared to dual core Xeon 5100 technology. 

The case study also says that BMW’s next refresh target are their RISC based servers

Can you gain a competitive edge replacing aging servers in your infrastructure

Estimate your savings today (www.intel.com/go/xeonestimator)

4 Comments Permalink
2

Recently in our test lab, we experienced a cooling failure... and I wasn't even sitting in the lab to realize it.  In fact, I wasn't in the same state!

 

With the recent launch of the Xeon 5500 Series servers - I have been testing some use-cases against four of our servers in our lab when I noticed that the temperature was rising pretty drastically in there.  How did I see this?  Using Intel® Intelligent Power Node Manager embeddd in our Xeon Servers and using our Intel Data Center Manager (DCM) SDK software interface - the data is presented in a visual format.

thermal trip.JPG

In the graph above, the dark colored line is the "front panel inlet" temperature, and in a matter of minutes, the temperature in the lab rose from 71F to 87F - 16 degrees!  What I didn't have setup is the scenario is a power policy that activates on a thermal trip.  Here is how you would setup this policy in Data Center Manager under the Policies section for this rack:

 

thermal-policy.JPG

In the event that a thermal event occurred that would cause the room to heat up to 78F (as shown above) - Intel DCM would send the IPMI commands to the platform which in turn would tell the Node Manager firmware to throttle-back the Xeon CPUs to their lowest P-state possible.  This would reduce energy consumed across the systems in the policy group as well as reduce the thermal output of each server.  This would in turn generate less heat across the servers thereby reducing the load placed on an already overheated lab or datacenter.

 

This gives the server managers more time to gracefully shutdown systems, and/or move the workloads to cooler sections of the datacenter.  If you have ever experienced a cooling failure in the datacenter, it's a usually a frenzy to shutdown machines to minimize heat and/or power utilization overall.  This thermal policy can give you more time before you reach a critical temperature where you start losing components, servers and ultimately - loss of data and productivity.

 

Using standard the standard IPMI interface, the Data Center Manager SDK and Node Manager on the Xeon 5500 series platform enable power monitoring, power management, and front panel inlet monitoring.   This gives a server/datacenter manager the capcity to measure power usage per server, where you'd have to previously have more expensive power measurement tools.  External power meters cost anywhere from a cheap $15 to spendy $1000 - but now the technology is embedded into the firmware on the machine.

 

You can learn more about the Xeon 5500 Series Processors on the Intel Xeon website.

2 Comments Permalink
1

Every day in our personal lives, we’re bombarded with “opportunities” to get a better deal.  At the grocery store, we might be able to buy a single item for $2.50 or 3 for $5.00…which then forces us to go thru the mental gymnastics of figuring out how good of a deal it is, and whether or not we really need three 96 oz. bottles of salad dressing.

 

But there are some opportunities out there for adding a bunch of compute performance are a bit more straight-forward.


Case in point: Dell recently had Principled Technologies compare the performance for the Intel® Xeon® Processor E5520 and E5506 CPUs each running on a PowerEdge R710 server.  Both are 4 core processors, but the E5520 has many advantages over the E5506: 

  • higher frequency (2.26 GHz vs. 2.13 GHz)
  • faster QuickPath speeds (5.86 GT/s vs. 4.8 GT/s)
  • faster memory support (1066 MHz vs. 800 MHz)
  • Turbo Boost
  • Hyper-Threading support.

 

Long story short:  Buying a slightly better processor with a server purchase can drastically increase your performance.  So if you are looking to buy a Dell PowerEdge server configured with Microsoft SQL Server 2008* and an Intel® Xeon® Processor E5506, for an additional $300 you can get up to 75% more performance by upgrading to an E5520 CPU.  More performance headroom in a similar power envelope, faster QuickPath and memory speeds, Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost functionality – all for $300.  NOW THAT’S A GREAT VALUE!

 

Check out the summary document for the Dell R710 Principled Technologies performance testing, which also has comparative performance testing for the Xeon® E5540 and X5550 CPUs (also a great value for the money!), along with results for Microsoft Exchange.

 

NOTE:  System pricing from www.dell.com as of May 13, 2009.  Actual performance will vary based on configuration, usage and manufacturing variability. See the actual Principled Technology report in the following link for complete system configuration

1 Comments Permalink
1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous Next

Filter Blog

By author: By date: By tag: