Japan announced today that it has emerged from recession, following Germany and France’s announcements last week that their economies also grew in the second quarter.
Moody’s Economy.com Business Confidence survey shows that confidence has been steadily increasing since March ‘09.
For the first time since September ’08, “Economic Recovery” nudges above “Economic Crisis” in Google Search Volume in early August.
In addition to this, economic forecasts (WW GDP, US GDP, and EU GDP) point to a recovery over the next 6 months.A couple of quotes:
The direction of real GDP is even expected to turn from negative to positive in the current quarter. The academic arbiters of the business cycle at the National Bureau of Economic Research will eventually proclaim that the Great Recession ended sometime this summer. Moody’s Economy.Com – July 7, 2009
The global economy is beginning to pull out of a recession unprecedented in the post–World War II era International Monetary Fund, imf.org – July 8, 2009
So, why am I bombarding this blog with various optimistic economic data? Because if we really are pulling out of the abyss, I’m worried that many companies out there are sitting on servers that will not be ready for the increased demand right around the corner.
John Gantz, IDC Vice President in his keynote speech at the start of this year’s CIO Summit in Auckland was quoted as saying there will be an unprecedented amount of IT-driven change in the next four years.He projected that there will be a three-fold rise in mobile users and information will grow five-fold, resulting in heightened levels of security and privacy and questions on which data to store or throw away. He also mentioned that the number of interactions between people on networks will grow eight times.
So this got me thinking… Is your company looking to differentiate and go after more market share while your competitors are hunkered down and not investing in the downturn? My guess is that there are a lot of IT managers being asked to support more social media, offer more SaaS, deploy more virtual machines, and support more real time analytics to get a leg up on the competition.My gut tells me that it will be hard to do all of this with older servers that were put into another year of extended warranty because that felt like the right move when the proverbial economic s**t hit the fan last year.
It’s critical to be prepared for when the recovery comes, and data points to an economic turnaround happening now – are you positioning your department to own it when it arrives?
You’ve seen it on the front pages of the papers lately.The program that offers consumers incentives to trade in older used cars for more fuel-efficient new cars is pushing auto sales into overdrive.The $1B in govt. funding for it was burned through in less than a week. The U.S. House of Representatives rushed through an additional $2B in emergency funds just to keep the program going, but will need Senate approval if it’s going to extend beyond Tuesday August 4th. My guess is to make a continuation of the program palatable to the U.S. taxpayer, the incentive will need to be cut (from $4500 for a new fuel-efficient car to somewhere in the $1-2k range) but it’s great to seen people buying cars and stimulating part of the economy – while getting older fuel-inefficient cars off the roads.
I saw an interesting article talking about whether a similar program for servers would work…and though I think it’s a creative idea, I’ll argue that Intel and our OEM partners have been offering “Cash for Clunkers” for quite some time now – without any U.S. taxpayer help.How? Through promoting the benefits of server refresh, a strategy that is proving to be one of the most beneficial investments to IT and business. Using the Xeon ROI Estimator I spent 2-3 minutes modeling potential savings by comparing 4-year old 2P Intel Xeon based servers to new 2P Intel Xeon 5500 based servers – and this is what I found:
An investment in one Intel Xeon 5500 based server (~$8.5k including purchase price, migration cost, and software validation) enables up to 10x performance per server, a 10:1 server consolidation opportunity vs. 10 older servers purchased 4 years ago that as an IT manager I can now get rid of.So where’s the cash for the clunkers? Well, I would save over $4k a year in energy costs and over $11k a year in server / software maintenance costs by cutting out the old and putting in the new.The 4-year total savings is about $38k, with a break even period of about 9 months. Not bad…and that doesn’t even take into consideration software licensing costs that I probably can save by cutting down the server count. Try modeling this yourself and check out the new PowerPoint report that you can generate from it – really explains the benefits in a way that the finance and facilities folks will find useful.
I also found this link that explains why Intel IT decided to move ahead with server refresh in 2009 after current economic conditions forced Intel to re-evaluate the strategy. Analysis found that delaying server refresh for a year would increase costs by USD 19 million.
And a refresh strategy also applies to the bigger 4 Socket and above servers as well, as documented in this server refresh brief.
Server Refresh is a strategic investment for IT – the cash for clunkers program that keeps on giving.
I recently had the opportunity to sit down with Intel's Chief Virtualization Architect Rich Uhlig to discuss the new usage models and virtualization technologies in Intel new Xeon 5500 series platform. Rich and I have been friends and colleagues for several years and the video of our discussion is attached and can be viewed on Youtube. The conversation sparked some interesting questions from my colleagues, friends and children which I thought I would share with a wider audience.
First the questions from my son's (I have three boys...yes this means that my wife has the patience of a saint):
Dad, what is virtualization? Does that mean you can take people and computers and teleport them to new places, like Star Trek? Did Intel invent virtualization? Why do you think it is so cool? When I grow up, can I be virtualized?
My Answer:
Slow down.....slow down...let me try to answer the questions one at a time.
Virtualization is the ability to increase computer, network and storage utilization with multiple operating systems or logical machines, called virtual machines. This allows Dad and his friends to use more of their computers with different applications and devices. Using virtualization allows Dad and his friends to save money, save power and increase efficiency.
Response (My three son's in unison):
Boring! I thought you said your job is cool. Your such a geek......(trailing off and looking at their iPods)
My response:
Guys, hold on...let me explain. Virtualization technology IS cool. While it wasn't invented by Intel, we have worked with an industry of incredibly gifted engineers, architects and designers to create new ways for people to use their computer technology....and the best part is we are only in the beginning. By the time you are an adult you will have the opportunity to use virtualization technology in ways we are only beginning to imagine. Think of virtualization as a journey and evolution of computer technology for Dad and his friends to maximize the use of the computers that we buy/build. Hopefully, with more innovation and computer technology advances you will be able to create a virtualization layer that will allow you and your digital identity to "teleport" to new places in a virtual cloud. You won't be "virtualized" but you will be able to create your digital environment wherever there is a machine that can understand your commands. That is pretty cool. Think of it this way, you can save and play your Nintendo Wii, Sony Playstation or XBox profiles on any machine, any where in the world that can download your profile.
Response (from my 13 year old):
You mean I can play EA's Madden Football 24 hours a day with my friends, even when we are on vacation and you want me to see some historic landmark, like the Lincoln Memorial?
My response:
Well...yes but not exactly what I had in mind. (aargh!)
A recent question from my friend from a former job on Virtualization:
I hear the new Intel chip, Nehalem (formerly known as the Intel Xeon 5500 series), is the best product you guys have released in a long time, What makes the product so good, is it the virtualization technology that you work on?
My response:
Virtualization technology provides increased instrumentation and flexibility for the Intel Xeon 5500 series platform but it is only one a host of fantastic features which make this product the best we have ever released. For Data Center managers, increased efficiency is an every day part of life. Nehalem offers increased performance, increase memory capacity, a new Quick Path Interconnect (which acts like a NUMA switch fabric on silicon, remember that cool product we launched in 1997 at Sequent Computers?) and a 2nd generation of virtualization capabilities that deliver native virtualization instruction capabilities for VMWare, Microsoft, Citrix and a host of Xen providers. It is a truly a breakthrough server product. With this new architecture and design characteristics we are able to meet the needs of a platform of new Virtualization usage models including: Rapid Application Deployment, High Availability, Virtual Desktop Infrastructures and Server Consolidation. It is a very exciting time...
My friend's response:
Very cool. I miss working on hardware innovations...sounds like you guys at Intel are up to something special. Should I buy the stock?
My response:
Thanks. Intel is a great place to work and we are doing some very cool product innovations. Do we always have to talk about stock price?
Finally, a recent question from a dear colleague:
What happens if virtualization technology is deployed on every platform that Intel ships? Won't business and consumers need less devices? Won't users no longer have an insatiable demand for compute, network and storage resources?
My Answer:
Funny you should ask that question. Rich Uhlig, Fernando Martins, Rick Olha, RK and I have debated this exact question for years. The answer is simple. Virtualization increases demand for more resources than ever before. In fact, until the recent economic downturn virtualization technology was cited by a Citigroup analyst as the key driver to Server growth in 2H 2007. For the first time in over 10 years the markets average selling price was increasing. Why? Because users could do more with every server they purchased. Virtualization actually facilitiates more usages on more application development and production environments than ever before. As we increase the performance of the instruction sets and Intel Microarchitectures we increase the capabilities that virtualization can impact for new usage models, while preserving some the legacy compatibility that users require for 32-bit application workloads. Simply stated, "we can do more with less!"
Next question (by the way this was a skeptical Intel exec.):
Doing more with less is fine...but what about our volumes for server products? what happens when virtualization is prevalent across all of Intel CPU and Platform offerings?
My response:
Flexibility and control are critical to all of our customers regardless of form factor. Is there anything worse then buying a new server, PC or handheld and having application compatibility errors? No. Do we really believe the world wants to become software compatibility specialists everytime Microsoft releases a new operating system? What about Dell, HP, Lenovo, IBM, Acer, Nokia, Motorola, LG, Samsung, RIM and HTC? It has taken us over 10 years of research, testing and product development to get here. Virtualization is a "Hot Topic" today and will be in the future because it makes a positive difference in our customers lives both financially and efficiently. Our job is deliver the greatest silicon products the world has ever seen, over and over and over again. Virtualization allows us to do that AND preserve the investments our customers and software partners make in developing their own operating environments. What is cooler than that? Virtualization facilitates innovation, consumption and utilization, our customers are telling us this everyday. Innovation is critical to this process, enabling our software colleagues is a must and opening up the discussion is part of the process.
Her response:
Well, I guess you are pretty passionate about virtualization?
My response:
I hope so...that is why you hired me.
Have a listen, enjoy the video and join the discussion of Rich and I. For us, Virtualization is a very Hot topic, that we have thought is Cool for a very long time.
Did you know that many electrical utility companies are offering rebates for companies that purchase energy efficient IT equipment such as servers, PCs and power management software?
Why are utilities doing this? Today’s high cost of energy and the availability of Federal stimulus dollars for energy efficiency programs are making this an ideal time for utilities to offer customers incentives for investing in energy efficient computers and servers. Federal agencies are directing funds to utilities to support these incentives.Also, state legislation often requires many utilities to devote a portion of revenues to fund energy efficiency programs, including encouraging the purchase of energy efficient IT equipment such as servers, PCs, and power management software.
In the United States, there are currently 20+ utilities that are offering rebate incentives for the purchase energy efficient IT equipment with another 70+ utilities considering or in the process of rolling out a rebate program. Here’s a list of utilities that we know of (as of July ’09).
•Arizona Public Service Company
•AustinEnergy
•Avista
•BC Hydro (Vancouver, BC)
•Bonneville Power Administration
•Energy Trust of Oregon
•Idaho Power
•Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
•Manitoba Hydro
•Northeast Utilities
•Oncor Energy
•Pacific Gas and Electric
•Sacramento Muni Utility District
•San Diego Gas and Electric
•Seattle City Light
•Silicon Valley Power
•Snohomish PUD
•Southern California Edison
In addition to the savings that can be achieved just by consolidating multiple older servers with newer Xeon® 5500 (Nehalem) servers, getting additional cash back from the utility companies can make the decision to refresh your server infrastructure that much more lucrative.
Let me know if you are aware of other rebate or incentive programs offered by your utility company (U.S. or another country).
I wrote a while back about how the Xeon 7400(Dunnington) processor series compared to RISC. Since then I have shared information through other blog posts and sharing content about how Xeon 7400 and Xeon 5500 will compare to both SPARC and POWER.
Xeon 7400 and Xeon 5500 are the current products shipping into the marketplace today. I.M.H.O they offer a pretty compelling alternative from both a performance and TCO perspective Vs SPARC and POWER. But I will not try and repeat all the reasons here
What I wanted to share with you was some thoughts about what the next product to succeed Xeon 7400 will bring to the RISC party. Nehalem-EX is the code-name for our next generation of product designed to serve workloads currently serviced by Xeon 7400 today (i.e. Database, ERP, BI etc). EX btw is what we all would traditionally call MP or multi processor servers
Don't stop reading now, here is why I'm EXCITED about what Nehalem-EX will bring to the RISC party.
My excitement is actually based on real customer discussions about what Nehalem-EX will do for them and why it delivers some new stuff (my code for features and benefits) which they see as a pre-requisite to make the move from RISC to Xeon. For some customers the TCO and performance of products have been enough to convince them to move. For some other customers there are still some checkboxes remaining which I believe Nehalem-EX will address
Here is a snapshot of some of the cool new stuff which is actually convincing customers (from some real deals that I have worked)
Improved bandwidth. Up to 9 times memory bandwidth of previous generations
I’m here this week in familiar stomping grounds, the Moscone Center, in San Francisco. Today’s event started off strong with John Chambers keynote address. His speech was very engaging as he wandered through the audience, capturing the attention of nearly 10K attendees. What caught my eye especially was his focus on collaboration and Web2.0. The example he used was the recent launch of the Cisco Unified Computing Solution (UCS) which was launched via online tools such as blogs, telepresence, and flicker, check out this photo:
This shows that the virtual launch reached 10x the audience at 1/10th the cost! I am really glad to hear that since this is what I do for a living.
John also spoke about some emerging technologies and I found out that Cisco has been working very closely with the Dallas Cowboys on increasing the customer experience. I was a little disappointed to hear John is a Niners fan, but had to expect that coming from a man and a company that was named after San Fran’cisco’, so I give him a break on that one.
It was also very interesting to hear a bit about the history of the Cisco logo, looks like times have changed and so has the logo:
After the keynote, I caught up with John and Kirk Skaugen, Executive Vice President with Intel’s Digital Enterprise Group at the Intel booth where Kirk had a surprise. Intel presented to Cisco and John a XEON 5500 processor series wafer (code named Nehalem).
Here’s another shot with a the XEON 5500 wafer:
I’ll being covering more of the event and participating in social media events during the event. Look for future updates here in the Server Room.
We talk a lot about how great the Intel Xeon processor compares vs. competing RISC architectures when it come to price and price/performance on various workloads, but unfortunately for many existing people running on RISC hardware, simply throwing out the old and standardizing on the shiny new Intel-based servers isn't always that simple of a proposition. Why? Your existing software running on UNIX (i.e. AIX, Solaris) may be custom-coded on your flavor of UNIX, the source code may be lost, the guy who wrote retired 5 years ago, etc. So, how do you account for this when 'running the numbers' to see if it makes sense to rid yourself of the power and money-sucking old RISC server collecting dust in the back of the data center? These five steps may help:
1. Understand the business benefits of moving from your existing RISC hardware to IA (and compare vs buying new RISC hardware)
This is the simple analysis that looks at performance of your existing system, compares it to new hardware and then factor in other significant cost items like power consumption, software licensing, software/hardware maintenance costs, etc. Of course, this almost always shows that new Intel hardware will save you significant dollars over the long-term and you can figure out how quickly you pay-back your cost of the server in years or possibly months based on this simple calculation. And, many server hardware vendors (and Intel field reps) have these tools available, you just need to ask.
2. ***** your current RISC-based infrastructure
Meaning, look at all the software that actually runs on these servers, the packaged applications and the custom code. Do you use particular storage adapters and drivers for your SAN, etc? Make a list. Now, look to see which items are easy, and which ones will be hard to migrate. If it's a packaged database that available on Windows, Linux, and Solaris for IA already, then it may be fairly to migrate the data over in a short period of time by yourself and move on. However, for those custom codes and potential software packages that will need to be changed in order to move to current hardware, start looking at the real costs to migrate these pieces. Often, this step will require some help from a services company or a hardware vendor that can provide these services in addition to selling you the new hardware. Now that you have these estimates, factor it back into step #1. Sure, the ROI will not look as good, but often will be surprising still very good even after factoring in these migration costs.
3. Develop a migration plan
You may chose to do this on your own if it doesn't look too intimidating, but for more complicated migrations, likely you will need some external help. If you've factored in these services costs already during the previous step then the cost of doing this step is already justified. Many services companies will give you the estimate very inexpensively.
4. Test
You may only be able to test the 'easy stuff' initially, but verify the performance deltas between the new and old systems calculated in step 1 to correctly size how much hardware you will need in actual deployment. This is where the actual performance of the system will measure up vs. the performance estimates used in your ROI analysis in step 1. Sometimes this can be better than calculated or worse, your mileage is guaranteed to vary.
5. Deploy
If you have your migration plan in place from step 3, now you execute according your plan, ensuring your migrate data in the right order to ensure minimal downtime.
These steps can be very intimidating, many people in IT find it hard to justify the migration costs (particularly if you need to pay for some services), but taking a systematic approach to it and carefully calculating your ROI including these extra costs will often make it worth the effort.
I was out at HP Tech Forum last week and had a chance to catch up on all the latest technology advancements with HP and Intel. What I saw was staggering, over 17 new HP-Intel designs, the HP Performance Optimized Datacenter (POD), and lot's more that I will be sharing with you in coming days as I add more video from the event and help to tell the story if you couldn't be there. First off, I caught up with John McAtee from Intel's HP account team. He was showing a cool demonstration on why now is the right time to invest in XEON 5500 processor series technology. Check out this video and find out how you can start saving in your datacenter today !
If you want more information on how the XEON 5500 processor series can starting saving in the datacenter, check out this ROI Calculator tool. Also, if you are looking for detailed information or are just looking to gain more knowledge, you can always "Ask The Professor" in our Server Learning Center.
Running multiple Unix environments across a range of locations adds increased complexity and cost to the IT environment. I came across an interesting case study and wanted to highlight some of the key findings
YPF SAis the largest company in Argentina operating in the Oil and Gas industry. The company has 29 gas plants around Argentina running different Unix environments such as HP-UX, AIX and Solaris.
YPF SA consolidated their SAP ERP and Oracle DB environment from multiple Unix environments to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 with integrated virtualization running on Intel Xeon based platforms from IBM System X
Some of the key findings to highlight
Key requirement from Unix Administration Team that "migrating from old RISC/Unix and proprietary servers to open and flexible platforms would pose no risk to the reliability, availability and performance of the systems"
Positive impact on cost and performance; Lowered costs, simplified management and increased compatibility
Reduction in costs especially when compared to license costs of RISC based platforms
Increased performance and availability drove decision to scale with RHEL and Xeon
Ability to leverage Redhat integrated virtualization. Free up internal hardware and technical resources for other projects
I guess the combination of Redhat and Intel deliver the business results that customers are seeking. What do you think?
Every day in our personal lives, we’re bombarded with “opportunities” to get a better deal.At the grocery store, we might be able to buy a single item for $2.50 or 3 for $5.00…which then forces us to go thru the mental gymnastics of figuring out how good of a deal it is, and whether or not we really need three 96 oz. bottles of salad dressing.
But there are some opportunities out there for adding a bunch of compute performance are a bit more straight-forward.
Case in point:Dell recently had Principled Technologies compare the performance for the Intel® Xeon® Processor E5520 and E5506 CPUs each running on a PowerEdge R710 server.Both are 4 core processors, but the E5520 has many advantages over the E5506:
higher frequency (2.26 GHz vs. 2.13 GHz)
faster QuickPath speeds (5.86 GT/s vs. 4.8 GT/s)
faster memory support (1066 MHz vs. 800 MHz)
Turbo Boost
Hyper-Threading support.
Long story short:Buying a slightly better processor with a server purchase can drastically increase your performance.So if you are looking to buy a Dell PowerEdge server configured with Microsoft SQL Server 2008* and an Intel® Xeon® Processor E5506, for an additional $300 you can get up to 75% more performance by upgrading to an E5520 CPU.More performance headroom in a similar power envelope, faster QuickPath and memory speeds, Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost functionality – all for $300.NOW THAT’S A GREAT VALUE!
Check out the summary document for the Dell R710 Principled Technologies performance testing, which also has comparative performance testing for the Xeon® E5540 and X5550 CPUs (also a great value for the money!), along with results for Microsoft Exchange.
NOTE:System pricing from www.dell.com as of May 13, 2009.Actual performance will vary based on configuration, usage and manufacturing variability. See the actual Principled Technology report in the following link for complete system configuration
Are you a developer writing applications to run on the Solaris operating system?. Are you looking for ways to optimize your Solaris solution on industry standard architecture based on Intel microprocessor? If you answer yes to either of these questions then please read on.
Intel and SUN have been working closely together to optimize the Solaris operating system on the Intel Xeon 5500 processor. Most of you probably know the Xeon 5500 better by its product codename Nehalem. The Xeon 5500 is the the product that fits into 2 socket platforms.
SUN have just published a very compelling quick reference guidethat will assist both Developers and System Administrators looking to optimize Solaris solutions on Xeon based processors. The guide talks about the work that Intel and SUN are doing together, technical descriptions of specific features and capabilities that can be implemented in the Solaris OS to optimize the capabilities of the Xeon.
I have just finished reading this and it is a very compelling paper covering topics such as
- How Solaris takes advantage of Intel Turbo Boost Technology to use available power headroom to deliver higher performance based on workload demand
- How Solaris can take advantage of new Intel Quickpath Interconnect (better known as QPI) and other innovations in the OS to reduce memory latency
- How Solaris performance counters help to better manage workloads
- How Solaris takes advantage of many of the power efficiency capabilities in the processor. Things like Power Aware Dispatched in Solaris enable the processor to stay longer in idle states. In non tech talk this saves power.
Solaris has been a tried and tested operating system for along time for companies running their most business critical workloads. This paper talks about the combination of Solaris and Xeon to deliver improved reliability and availability for these critical workloads. Detail information on predictive self healing, fault management, leveraging Intel Machine Check Architecture and more all included in this paper.
Probably my favourite section is around the developer tools optimizations and the different tools available for developers that want to run and optimize their applications on Solaris and Xeon.
Ok, I'll stop waxing lyrical now. This is a very compelling paper and it does certainly construe that Solaris and Xeon 5500 could be the perfect combination for your Solaris solution. What do you think?
The debate on how to best increase system capacity to accommodate growing applications has raged on for years; “scale up” with more CPU, memory, and I/O, or “scale out” with loosely connected systems. Scaling out by adding networked systems to increase capacity has been a good economical solution for many IT managers because it allows them to grow by using less expensive, industry standard building blocks. However, there are some notable exceptions to this line of thought. One is that the class of applications that require shared memory and large database support are much better suited to run on a single, expandable system that scales up. These are typically transaction processing, business intelligence and ERP solutions. Until now, IT managers running applications that require scale-up systems larger than 4 or 8 CPUs have had limited platform choices and most were proprietary and expensive RISC-based servers.
The other problem with the scale out approach is the people, facilities, software and overhead costs and complexity of managing very large numbers of servers, which can grow to a point where the costs outweigh the performance and system cost benefits. The industry solution to achieving better ROI has been to consolidate multiple scale-out servers onto single industry standard scale-up servers with virtualization solutions. This is a good solution, but is limited by the number of application loads the IT manager feels comfortable placing on a single server, given the need to maintain peak performance and availability for each application.
Well, it looks like the scale-up, scale-out debate is about to take another turn. In the server product update Intel gave on May 26th, they talked about new levels of system scalability and choice supported by the upcoming Nehalem-EX processor. This processor will support systems that scale up to 8 sockets natively (shared memory, without any additional silicon), and up to 16 sockets and higher with node controllers from system manufactures that allow single systems to share memory beyond 8 sockets. So far there are over 15 different designs from 8 OEMs that offer 8 socket or higher scalability. But of course, for the class of application where scaling is important, socket count doesn’t tell the whole story of what’s needed for scalable performance. Thread support, key for transaction processing and virtualization, scales at the rate of 16 threads per socket with 8 cores and Hyper Threading (2 threads per core). That would be 128 threads for an 8-socket system, and 256 threads for 16 sockets. And in order to keep those threads fed with data close to the CPU, each processor supports up to 24 MB of shared cache (1.5X current generation Xeon), and an impressive 16 memory slots per socket or 128 DIMMs on an 8-socket system. In addition, the Scalable Memory Interconnect gives these systems 9 times the memory bandwidth of today’s top Xeon processor. Finally, four QuickPath interconnect links per socket allow for high-bandwidth sharing of data across the system.
So the net of it is that the industry is going to see a broad selection of highly scalable, next-generation servers that significantly extend the economic advantage of industry standard scale-up solutions for business-critical, large database, and high-end virtualization/consolidation deployments. I would expect these systems to give IT managers a very cost-effective alternative to the much more expensive and proprietary RISC-based servers they use today.
If you read my blog about server refresh and quarterbacks, you will understand how important it is to have a good quarterback inside your organization leading the server refresh effort.Well at Intel IT that person is Matt Beckert.
I have had the opportunity to work closely with Matt over the past couple years and have watched Intel’s server refresh strategy develop, get ratified and … because of the economic conditions … get questioned.It was interesting to sit on the sidelines and watch how the economy caused intel to question a proven strategy that delivered $45M of savings to intel in 2008 (Intel IT Performance Reports).
Ever since I was a kid, I have been an avid New England Patriots fan and Tom Brady is worth every dollar of the over $14M the Patriots will pay him in 2009…
However, I’m sure glad that Matt is on the Intel IT team as his efforts have demonstrated to Intel that proceeding with server refresh in 2009 inside Intel IT’s infrastructure is worth $19M of savings versus deferring refresh to 2010.Read more about “Staying Committed to Server Refresh Reduces Cost” and find out where the savings came from, how Intel IT overcame the capital budget constraints internally to make this priority investment.
A recent customer who worked for the US Department of Defense expressed an interest in using the Intel Xeon Server Refresh Savings Estimator off-line (no internet connection) due to security concerns of using their own internal business data over the internet.
For those of you who may have similar concerns, here is a procedure that will give you access to the ROI estimator on the safety of your own laptop or desktop computer.