Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > The Server Room > Blog > Tags > datacenter_refresh

The Server Room Blog

2 Posts tagged with the datacenter_refresh tag
1

So are you among the approximately 40% of data center managers that are projected to run out of power or cooling capacity in the next 12-241 months and need new options to deal with ever increasing demand for compute capacity? In my discussions with IT professionals, it’s clear that a “business as usual” approach to the design and operation of the data center is no longer sufficient.

In the coming weeks, you will see a number of bloggers write about using Intel Xeon Processor 5500 (Nehalem) servers to refresh the data center – a concept first discussed on this site back in late 2007 - to more efficiently use limited power, cooling and floor space resources in the data center. Today, I want to touch on another means of addressing these issues at hand - using instrumentation as a source of data and controls to better monitor and manage the data center.

Individual pieces of the data & control picture have steadily come into the mainstream via instrumentation of individual server components. Think processors that allow power & frequency to be modulated. Power Supplies that report system level power consumption. Memory that reports its temperature. Fans that can scale RPMs and power to the actual air flow requirements. Really cool capabilities, but these somewhat fragmented sources of data and control don’t provide the capability to manage at the rack or data center level. The challenge at hand is to take all of these individual points of component instrumentation and develop system and data center level capabilities – what I call extended instrumentation – to provide unique and innovative tools that data center managers need.

One of the more exciting extended instrumentation capabilities that has evolved is power capping. Power limits or caps defined and communicated by console management software are enforced by system level functionality, enabling the ability to limit system power in a dynamic fashion. Applications of the use of power capping range from increasing performance density to temporarily shedding compute load to ride through power or thermal events in the datacenter to enabling power based dynamic resource balancing. Power Capping gives IT managers a tool to squeeze additional compute performance out of their existing data center – making more efficient use of their limited and valuable power, cooling and floor space resources to lower costs, improve availability and extend the life of the current data center.

Are you evaluating this capability? Are you using it already? I’m interested in discussing your thoughts on instrumentation and power capping.

1. http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/03/26/Datacenters-heading-for-cash-crunch_1.html

1 Comments Permalink
2

In the second comment around the right time for datacenter refresh, I'd like to look at Costs. Power is covered in the comment from Chris and I covered some comments on Space already in the discussion forum. So what it really boils down to is cost of running your existing datacenter versus the costs of throwing the servers out and replacing them. It is clear also from the other comments, that it doesn't make sense to throw out servers which are utilized in average 15% and have them replaced by new servers, which are 5 times faster and utilize the servers 3%... Great achievement hu?... Server Refresh makes therefore most sense to do only when consolidating the environment. How do I consolidate the environment? By using virtualization. See Helmuts blog and the whole theme next week on that topic.

 

Therefore let's look at the real cost factors, when refreshing the servers:

 

  • Cost of new hardware: That is obviously a significant capital expenditure and starting at about 2000$ for a reasonable DP server. But the trick is also that a lot of server companies offer financing models which make this an operational expenditure. But key is also to understand, that by consolidating your servers at the same time the depreciation costs of the servers may actually decrease, as you have less hardware to depreciate!

  • Maintenance costs: Again, reducing the number of servers running given applications, and at the same time unifying the environment helps significantly to reduce the maintenance costs. This can be a significant step in unifying on a given OS or hardware platform.

  • Power consumption: Similar to utilization, it doesn't make sense to just look at the power consumption by server, but at the consumption by performance and therefore I can save about 38% in power bills, on a given workload vs. the previous generation hardware and about a 10th of the power of hardware which is 2-3years old. Again, obviously only, if I do this in combination of consolidating the servers. Trick often is, that those costs are often not taken into consideration, as those are not billed to the IT department but to the facilities group. So it becomes an executive decision to ensure they are looked at!.

  • Switching costs. Obviously very hard to measure, as this depends on the environment of the customer. And I talked to the customer who said: "No I will never touch this AS400 system, as it just runs and runs and runs." On the other hand I had a customer who replaced just those AS400 systems and saw huge synergistic effects, because he put the application on a standard based architecture and was able to finally integrate it in the other production system and therefore have one reporting and analytics tool.

 

I try to make a long story short. This is not something you do very often, but you don't get married every year either. But most of the time it's worth going through the efforts. So thinking about replacing the servers which are older than 2-3years is definitely worth while and often an effort which pays off in the first year!

 

 

2 Comments Permalink

Filter Blog

By author: By date: By tag: