<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Server Room Blog</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog</link>
    <description>Server Room</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.9 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-29T20:31:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtualization and Legacy Replacement - where there's risc there is risk</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2008/08/29/virtualization-and-legacy-replacement-where-theres-risc-there-is-risk</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:94f71816-0bc1-448e-878b-b799018b8b96] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recently spoke with a large financial customer that has several hundred sparc boxes ( mostly inherited from an acquisiton). These systems are a challenge in that they are aging - some running out of available maintenance, slow, old, and the expertise in the company just doesn't extend to this architecture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They were also very proud of there virtualized Xeon architecture where they could move vm's quickly to maximize efficiency and optimize resources. I think it is time to bring these two together.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;So given 500 solaris servers&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;about half of these are running enterprise applications - like Oracle(tm) - that run just great under windows or linux. Move these today.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of the other half, most of these are - performance wise - tiny servers. You could put dozens of them - maybe all of them - in VMs on just a few large xeon servers. ( Don't forget about the phenominal virtualization perofrmance on the Xeon 7400 that Intel announced last week at IDF )&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So how do I move these custom solaris sparc based physical servers into my super efficient Xeon based virtual machines?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Three ways&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) recompile the apps for solaris 10 - which runs great in a vm on your virtualized pool&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Use transitive quicktransit and move the binaries to Solaris 10 or Linux vms in the pool&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) Move to the windows or linux version of the software, or replace it with software that does the same business function.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Presto&lt;/strong&gt; - 500 physical legacy servers - collapsed into a more efficient, more manageable, more modern pool of resources. What will you do with all the free space?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:94f71816-0bc1-448e-878b-b799018b8b96] --&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">virtualization</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">solaris</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">data</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">center</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">legacy</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">risc</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">refreash</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">modern</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">replace</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/tags">dunnington</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:50:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>ken.r.lloyd@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2008/08/29/virtualization-and-legacy-replacement-where-theres-risc-there-is-risk</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-08-29T20:50:59Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 3 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/comment/virtualization-and-legacy-replacement-where-theres-risc-there-is-risk</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=11482</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

