Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > The Server Room > Blog > Authors > Ed Groden

The Server Room Blog

8 Posts authored by: Ed Groden
2

Most of the time, server ROI is measured on the data center scale, replacing tens, hundreds, or even thousands of servers with fewer higher-performing and more energy efficient servers.

But...have you ever wondered how much power you could save if you replaced every 4 year old server in an entire country with Xeon 5500 Nehalem-based systems?  What about how much CO2 that could be removed for those same 4-year old servers – and number of cars it effectively removes from the road?

Well, wonder no more!  Check out this short paper for an eye-opening comparison of the UK, Germany, and France, and how big of an ROI they can realize if the entire country refreshed ALL of their 4-year-old servers.  It looks at power savings, land reclamation, and monetary savings in slightly different terms, like how much space can be saved in comparison to the floor area of Notre Dame Cathedral?  You’ll need to read on to find out more… J

Additionally, all calculations were done using the Xeon ROI tool, so check it out and come up with some more interesting comparisons based on your city, state, or country data.  Be sure to post them here!

 

 

 

2 Comments Permalink
0

Really good case study for a leading Turkish bank that used the Xeon ROI tool to justify their server refresh with Xeon 5500 and 7400 platforms:  http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-4114#cf

0 Comments Permalink
0

…on my way to a customer meeting, and the thought dawns on me about why the car I’m getting into is a relatively new, clean 2008 compact car and not a 1966 Chevy Impala, which probably has enough steel to dramatically distort the earth’s local magnetic field.  Well the reasons are fairly simple:

  • Newer cars are more reliable and require less maintenance - cars in the shop don’t make the rental car agency money, and don’t make customers happy if they break down
  • Newer cars are typically more fuel efficient - that ’66 Impala’s gas mileage might be quoted in gallons per mile J
  • Newer cars typically fall under a manufacturer warranty

As with rental cars, servers aren’t much different.  It’s all about keeping your business running smoothly, minimizing your operating costs, and keeping your customers happy.  While I’m guessing not many of today’s data centers have the server equivalent of a ’66 Impala in them, there are probably a bunch ready to be removed from the rental car fleet.

Think about it on your next business trip, and check out the benefits of refreshing servers that are only 3 or 4 years old with the Xeon® ROI estimator tool (link:  www.intel.com/go/xeonestimator).

0 Comments Permalink
0

Last month, Intel added another high-performing, low power to the Xeon 5500 SKU lineup with the Intel Xeon L5530 processor (2.40 GHz, 60W TDP).  As with the L5506 (2.13 GHz) and L5520 (2.26 GHz) SKUs that were launched in March, the L5530 deliver the same performance as its 80W counterpart (E5530), but at 25% lower CPU power.

With space being a valuable asset in power-constrained data centers (IDC estimates datacenter construction costs at an average of $1,000/sq ft and $40,000/rack), the Xeon L5530 delivers even more performance in the same 60W CPU power envelope to help get the most out of each rack. Here’s the tale of the tape:

  • 66% more performance than previous generation Xeon L5420 SKU
  • 45% more performance than the Xeon L5506 SKU

(performance numbers based on SPEC_int_rate2006*, see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/ for more details)

Want to find out more about the Xeon L5530 and the rest of the 5500 lineup, check out:  http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/products/server/processor/xeon5000

0 Comments Permalink
1

Every day in our personal lives, we’re bombarded with “opportunities” to get a better deal.  At the grocery store, we might be able to buy a single item for $2.50 or 3 for $5.00…which then forces us to go thru the mental gymnastics of figuring out how good of a deal it is, and whether or not we really need three 96 oz. bottles of salad dressing.

 

But there are some opportunities out there for adding a bunch of compute performance are a bit more straight-forward.


Case in point: Dell recently had Principled Technologies compare the performance for the Intel® Xeon® Processor E5520 and E5506 CPUs each running on a PowerEdge R710 server.  Both are 4 core processors, but the E5520 has many advantages over the E5506: 

  • higher frequency (2.26 GHz vs. 2.13 GHz)
  • faster QuickPath speeds (5.86 GT/s vs. 4.8 GT/s)
  • faster memory support (1066 MHz vs. 800 MHz)
  • Turbo Boost
  • Hyper-Threading support.

 

Long story short:  Buying a slightly better processor with a server purchase can drastically increase your performance.  So if you are looking to buy a Dell PowerEdge server configured with Microsoft SQL Server 2008* and an Intel® Xeon® Processor E5506, for an additional $300 you can get up to 75% more performance by upgrading to an E5520 CPU.  More performance headroom in a similar power envelope, faster QuickPath and memory speeds, Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost functionality – all for $300.  NOW THAT’S A GREAT VALUE!

 

Check out the summary document for the Dell R710 Principled Technologies performance testing, which also has comparative performance testing for the Xeon® E5540 and X5550 CPUs (also a great value for the money!), along with results for Microsoft Exchange.

 

NOTE:  System pricing from www.dell.com as of May 13, 2009.  Actual performance will vary based on configuration, usage and manufacturing variability. See the actual Principled Technology report in the following link for complete system configuration

1 Comments Permalink
0

When you’re planning a backpacking trip, whether it’s for several hours or several days, space is at premium.  Not only do you need to think about tents, sleeping bags, clothing, first aid, and navigational gear (among other things), but also how to keep yourself properly hydrated and fueled up.  Oh yeah, you have to figure out how to cram all of this gear into your pack…and carrying an additional pack is not an option!

Odds are you’ll be heading into the wilderness and won’t be able to re-supply for a while, so one of the limiting factors will be the amount of food you can carry.  Running out of fuel in the middle of nowhere makes for a potentially disastrous situation.

So let’s look at the nutritional numbers and how best to fuel the trip:

  • Fats:  ~9 calories per gram, and typically found in nuts and oils
  • Carbohydrates and proteins:  ~4 calories per gram, and typically found in sugars, grains, and meats

If you’re trying to maximize the number of calories you can carry in order to sustain you during your trip, you probably want to pack more foods with a higher fat content (such as peanut butter) than carbs or protein.  More calories per gram à more energy in your pack to get you where you want to go.

You can probably figure out where I’m going with this analogy – low power CPUs are all about helping maximize your performance per rack, just like packing foods with more calories per gram help deliver more energy in a limited amount of backpack space.

Depending on your specific rack power or overall datacenter power / cooling environment, low power SKUs might be a good fit to help maximize your performance per rack.  For the Intel® Xeon® 5500 series, there are two low power CPU options available, both spec’d at a 60W Thermal Design Point (TDP):  Xeon® L5506 (2.13 GHz) and the Xeon® 5520 (2.26 GHz).  These two SKUs have the same features as the corresponding Xeon® E5506 and E5520 SKUs, just lower in power. 

If you’re buying LV Xeon® 5400 CPUs today, such as the L5420, expect a big jump in performance per rack with the Xeon® L55xx SKUs due to lower overall system power and higher performance.  Similar story if you’re evaluating the Xeon® E5506 or E520 SKUs – same performance with L55xx SKUs with lower system power, so higher performance per rack.

Have questions – ask me on this blog or Ask An Expert in the Server Room.

0 Comments Permalink
6

Ever find yourself in a new location staring hopelessly at a map, wondering where you are?  Then to make matters worse, you call someone on your cell phone and can’t describe where you are so they can help? I think we’ve all been there more than once…

Since the Intel Xeon® 5500 processors launched in March, I’ve been getting a bunch of questions (including from the Ask An Expert community [http://communities.intel.com/message/12284#12284] in the Server Room) about DDR3 memory and how best to configure your server platforms to optimize performance.  Many times, folks are having a hard time just getting the conversation started, so here are a couple of tips to get you going.  The good thing is that DDR3 memory picks up where DDR2 memory leaves off in terms of speed, so you know you’ll be moving forward!

  1. Figure out how much memory you need.  With multi-core CPUs now mainstream in servers, you need enough memory to keep these compute engines fed.  One metric you might look at is “GB per CPU core” or “GB per socket” for your existing servers, and then project your memory requirements from there.

  1. Start with DDR3 1066 memory, as that will deliver a good balance of memory performance and capacity. 

ð        If you need more bandwidth (and willing to give up some capacity), use DDR3 1333

ð        If you need maximum capacity (and willing to give up some bandwidth), use DDR3 800

  1. Match your CPU to your memory speed because the faster memory does require a faster processor.  Check out page 11 of the product brief for the quick reference table.

  1. Wherever possible, fill up as many memory channels as possible, and populate all channels evenly (same type, size and number of DIMMs). 

ð        Most two-socket Xeon® 5500 platforms will have a total of 6 memory channels, so aligning your memory requirements to a multiple of 6 GB will optimize memory performance for most application environments.  

ð        However, you can mix/match memory types if your requirements call for something that is not a multiple of 6.

  1. For Server application environments, always go with ECC supported memory.  Decide between Registered (RDIMM) and Unbuffered DIMMs with ECC (UDIMM ECC).

ð        RDIMM provide greatest flexibility across DIMM sizes and availability

ð        UDIMM ECC provide a lower cost alternative if you are using 1 GB or 2 GB DIMMs

You will still want to check with your system vendor on the specifics, such as memory configurations and DIMM types and options supported for a given server, but hopefully this helps you pointed in the right direction.

If you are still lost, ask me a question on this blog or Ask An Expert in the Server Room.

6 Comments Permalink
0

I enjoy running, and I typically train with a heart rate monitor to help me stay in a certain zone during my workouts.  When I was out on a run the other day and started to settle into my zone, instead of my mind drifting off to a peaceful place (like it should), for some reason it started drawing parallels about the human heart and Turbo Boost Technology.  I decided to play along as I was my own captive audience.

Let’s start with the heart, which as a pump has evolved over a long time to be pretty darn reliable and adapt quickly based on the needs of its owner.  It’s nominally rated at about 70-100 beats per minute (BPM), which is all it needs to do to support most activities during a normal day.  If you take care of it and operate it within spec, it should provide many years of reliable service in that range. 

However, we know the heart is capable is much higher rates, and most every day I operate it well above the rated 70-100 BPM during my runs.  As long as I take in enough air, don’t overheat, or don’t cramp up, my heart can maintain these higher rates without much problem.  In fact, if I feel REALLY good on a particular day, I can probably go above my max heart rate, but it’s not recommended and a lot of bad things can happen (a typically accepted max BPM calculation is 220 BPM – your age).

How does this relate to Turbo Boost Technology?

Xeon® 5500 processors are spec’d at a rated frequency (for example, 2.93 GHz), and the processor and platform are designed to operate for an indefinite period of time at that frequency.  With Turbo Boost, the processor is now able to run higher than rated frequency whenever you need a boost in performance, provided it meets the following conditions:  (1) the operating system requests the extra performance (I want to go out running), and (2) the processor has power, current, or temperature headroom (I’m getting enough air, and not overheating or cramping up).  As long as those conditions are met, the processor will run at those higher frequencies to maximize performance whenever it’s needed, either for short periods, long periods, or somewhere in-between.  When your performance demands drop, the processor frequency drops down to normal.

How high can you Turbo?

Similar to your maximum heart rate, we need to set Turbo Boost frequency limits in the Xeon® 5500 processors.  For example, the highest Turbo frequency the 2.93 GHz processor can support is 3.33 GHz, which is a 400 MHz jump.  While there still could be platform headroom even at the highest Turbo Boost frequency (I’m still feeling good at my max heart rate), we need to set these limits to ensure the processors will function reliably for a good long time.

So let your servers get some exercise with Turbo Boost – they’ll thank you for it.

0 Comments Permalink

Filter Blog

By author: By date: By tag: