<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>IT@Intel Data Center Blog</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog</link>
    <description>Intel IT Data Center topics</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.9 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-19T17:26:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Free Cooling for Data Centers - video and whitepaper</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/2008/09/19/free-cooling-for-data-centers-video-and-whitepaper</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:8998ba6f-07ae-4a45-b4f5-9a1a388f4ce2] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi I’m Don Atwood, author of the newly released white paper and video that discusses our proof of concept (PoC) that tested cooling our Data Center with outside air. The topic of humidity control and if this would work in an ultra high humid climate keeps coming up. Most OEM spec’s allow for a wide range of humidity and it’s our belief that this cooling methodology could be used almost everywhere globally. Our only uncertainty comes around trying this near the ocean with high levels of salty corrosive wet air. We know it would negatively affect the servers at some point but the question is how quickly and is it within our refresh timetable. During a trip to ASIA last week I discussed trying a small scale “near the ocean” PoC to test this theory.. Does anyone thing this would add value to your company?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:8998ba6f-07ae-4a45-b4f5-9a1a388f4ce2] --&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">45nm</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">consolidation</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">data_center</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">data_center_efficiency</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">data_center_power</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">datacenter</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">efficiency</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">energy</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">energy_efficiency</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">green</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">hpc</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">intel</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">intel_performance_libraries</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">intel_threading_building_blocks</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">it@intel</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">multicore</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">performance</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">power</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">server</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">server_consolidation</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">threading_analysis</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">virtualization</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">vtune</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">xeon</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">don</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">atwood</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>don.c.atwood@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/2008/09/19/free-cooling-for-data-centers-video-and-whitepaper</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-09-19T18:20:06Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 2 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>8</clearspace:replyCount>
      <wfw:comment>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/comment/free-cooling-for-data-centers-video-and-whitepaper</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=11545</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel IT Deploys Virtualization - How we did it!</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/2008/04/24/intel-it-deploys-virtualization-how-we-did-it</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:e886b23b-d045-4659-ae03-3b75f872f9a6] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;As this is my first blog on this forum, I'd like to introduce myself.  My name is Bill Sunderland and I have been working at Intel for 12 years primarily working on Server Hardware Engineering and the last three years of which I have focused my efforts on Program Managing the Virtualization Engineering release for Intel IT.  I have recently published a WP demonstrating the methodology used as described below.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Intel IT planned, engineered, and has begun deploying a virtualized business-computing production environment at several data centers, a rollout that will continue through 2008.  Our initiative has already confirmed anticipated virtualization benefits such as faster, more automated deployment. We are initially consolidating older servers running applications that are not mission-critical; we see opportunities to achieve 16:1 consolidation ratios.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Click here to read the WP:  &lt;a class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-1513"&gt;Implementing Virtualization in a Global Business-Computing Environment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would be interested in hearing your experiences and/or questions regarding virtualizing IT environments!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:e886b23b-d045-4659-ae03-3b75f872f9a6] --&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">consolidation</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">data_center</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">data_center_efficiency</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">data_center_power</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">datacenter</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">efficiency</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">energy</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">energy_efficiency</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">it@intel</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">multicore</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">performance</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">power</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">server</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">virtualization</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">xeon</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:58:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>bill.s.sunderland@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/2008/04/24/intel-it-deploys-virtualization-how-we-did-it</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-04-24T17:58:16Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 7 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>7</clearspace:replyCount>
      <wfw:comment>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/comment/intel-it-deploys-virtualization-how-we-did-it</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=11098</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comparing Two- and Four-socket Platforms for Server Virtualization</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/2008/04/22/comparing-two-and-foursocket-platforms-for-server-virtualization</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:5f2020f6-7456-4516-b579-5f7d77b8edcf] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;The relative positioning of 2 and 4-socket servers for server virtualization has been an open question for a long time - a question that has stumped the most astute of IT professionals time and again.  In fact it might not be an exaggeration to say that this open question is almost in the same class as the famous Riemann's hypothesis that has remained unsolved for over a century! (If you accept that premise, then there's some real estate on the moon that I'd like to bring to your attention as well). Although advocates for either class of servers have been emphatic in their respective positions, compelling data-points supporting their positions have been few and far between.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To remedy this sorry state of affairs, an Intel IT team conducted in-depth tests and analysis using current quad-core processor based 2 and 4-socket servers in a virtualized environment.  This effort culminated in a comprehensive framework for comparing server platforms for virtualization. This comparative framework encompasses the majority of common deployment scenarios and usage models and answers - once and for all - the long unanswered question "which server is more appropriate for my virtualization project?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The whitepaper detailing the findings can be found here &lt;a class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-1512"&gt;Comparing Two- and Four-Socket Platforms for Server Virtualization&lt;/a&gt;. If time is short, click on the icon below for a short video overview.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!--[CodeBlockStart:fe40cf0a-6a13-4595-ac10-cc3edddf5242]--&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[CodeBlockEnd:fe40cf0a-6a13-4595-ac10-cc3edddf5242]--&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--[CodeBlockStart:962c971b-a36c-4194-9c94-36f5558171f3]--&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[CodeBlockEnd:962c971b-a36c-4194-9c94-36f5558171f3]--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!--[CodeBlockStart:69dabc78-1f25-42f1-8e39-34e1635d6a82]--&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[CodeBlockEnd:69dabc78-1f25-42f1-8e39-34e1635d6a82]--&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:5f2020f6-7456-4516-b579-5f7d77b8edcf] --&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">datacenter</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">server</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">virtualization</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">tco</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">performance</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">benchmark</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">vconsolidate</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">quad-core</category>
      <category domain="http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/tags">xeon</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:39:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>sudip.chahal@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/2008/04/22/comparing-two-and-foursocket-platforms-for-server-virtualization</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-04-23T00:39:46Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 7 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <wfw:comment>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/comment/comparing-two-and-foursocket-platforms-for-server-virtualization</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/it/datacenterblog/blog/feeds/comments?blogPost=11093</wfw:commentRss>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

