Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > IT@Intel > Data Center Blog > Blog > 2008 > April > 22
0

The relative positioning of 2 and 4-socket servers for server virtualization has been an open question for a long time - a question that has stumped the most astute of IT professionals time and again. In fact it might not be an exaggeration to say that this open question is almost in the same class as the famous Riemann's hypothesis that has remained unsolved for over a century! (If you accept that premise, then there's some real estate on the moon that I'd like to bring to your attention as well). Although advocates for either class of servers have been emphatic in their respective positions, compelling data-points supporting their positions have been few and far between.

 

To remedy this sorry state of affairs, an Intel IT team conducted in-depth tests and analysis using current quad-core processor based 2 and 4-socket servers in a virtualized environment. This effort culminated in a comprehensive framework for comparing server platforms for virtualization. This comparative framework encompasses the majority of common deployment scenarios and usage models and answers - once and for all - the long unanswered question "which server is more appropriate for my virtualization project?"

 

The whitepaper detailing the findings can be found here Comparing Two- and Four-Socket Platforms for Server Virtualization. If time is short, click on the icon below for a short video overview.

 


 

 

 


 

0 Comments Permalink
0

My daughter recently brought home from school a photocopy of the lyrics of Jack Johnson’s “The 3 R’s” (from the Curious George soundtrack), which encourage us to “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle”. This struck me as relevant in some of the recent discussions I have been having about Greenwashing in the Data Center.

 

A fair amount of our data center strategy deals with driving down costs. We’re trying to spend less money to deliver the same or better results. Along the way, we find opportunities to be green. While I would love to have more meetings that start out with the question of “what can we do to help the environment?” rather than “what can we do to cut costs?”, we do talk about both. This is somewhat similar to consumer-oriented eco-efforts, encouraging people to save the world while saving money: unplug electronic devices when they're not being used, replace your appliances with more energy-efficient ones, etc. I don't know of many people or organizations who wouldn't like to spend less money, and when we can help the environment at the same time it's win-win.

 

Which brings me back to the song lyrics. Our cost-cutting measures tend to be related to at least two of the three “R’s” – reducing what we consume, many times by reusing what we already have. I’ll spend my next few posts exploring this a bit further, giving some specific examples of our cost-savings initiatives that ultimately contribute to a greener data center and IT infrastructure.

 

Happy Earth Day...

0 Comments Permalink