Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > IT@Intel > Blog > Tags > servers

IT@Intel Blog

3 Posts tagged with the servers tag
1

Net Present Value. Since coming to IT, I have spent much time focused on the topic of business value.  This topic has dominated customer presentations and events, CIO forums, internal discussions several blog posts and even a few twitter discussions that I've been having.  Whether an IT organization is attempting to justify investment to support a new project or communicating the benefit of an existing one, being able to communicate, demonstrate and deliver the value of those projects is critical.

 

What I have learned is that there are many different ways to communicate the savings or value created by a project.  Matt Beckert, Intel IT finance, and I have spent several hours discussing this topic.  Let me provide the cliff notes (simplified version) and why Intel IT is moving to a standard methodology focused on Net Present Value.

 

Many times you will hear individuals talk about how much they saved by doing something.  Example, yesterday I saved 10% by using a coupon buying a coffee at Starbucks.  I saved $0.35 on my $3.50 latte. So while I avoided spending $0.35, did I create value for myself – not really.

 

Value is often a collection of costs that include what I had to spend (my capital outlay), cost avoidance (what I didn’t have to spend), operational cost savings (how my daily costs are affected), additional revenue generated (what I earned), productivity gained (greater output for equal or less input) and several other variables.  Intel IT looks at a variety of business value metrics for our project portfolio.

 

In the terms of IT projects, the business must invest in something to achieve a goal.  The collective measure of money spent vs. benefit received is a Net benefit.  If I buy 100 t-shirts to sell for a charity and each t shirt costs me $5 and then I sell those t-shirts for $15 each, then the net benefit to my charity of that project is $1,000 (100 x $15 minus 100 x $5).

 

Expanding on my example further.  What if I did not sell those shirts immediately but I held on to them for five years.  In this case, my net benefit would still be $1,000 from the project but because of inflation, the value of that earnings is worth less to me than if I sold them immediately.  If inflation was 10% per year, then the $1,500 that I earned from sales would [when discounted back with inflation $1,500 / ((1+inflation rate) ^(# years))] would only be worth about $931 in today’s dollars today.  So taking into account the time-value of money, now this t-shirt project was only worth $431 to me in today’s currency or Present Value.

 

(Readers Aid.  If you anything like me, this topic makes my head spin, Matt helped me build a cheat sheet table that shows the time value of money depending on how long it is held and the annual inflation rate or discount rate applied over that period of time.  See the table at the end of this blog.)

 

It is possible that I could have earned more than $431 by doing another project or by maybe investing my original capital of $500 in the financial market and getting a better ROI (often called the “hurdle rate” for financial planning).  With many IT projects affecting a many types of cash flows over different time horizons, it is critically important from a financial perspective to compare apples to apples when looking at projects. 

 

This is why a Net Present Value is so important – it allows business leaders to compare the net value (return on capital) in present value (accounting for time value of money) across many projects, thus prioritizing the most important ones with an eye on the bottom line.

 

I have to admit, while communicating savings in terms of NPV is a lot more confusing and often less interesting (the numbers are lower than gross undiscounted multiple year savings numbers), it does enable a more level playing field and better articulates the actual impact projects are having on an organization.  For example, in the recent data center paper published by Intel IT, our gross benefit is estimated at $1B, while our NPV is estimated at up to $650 Million - depending on when we make the investments and how quickly we realize the benefits.  Either way you look at it, you can draw one common conclusion: our eight year Data Center IT strategy is creating a lot of business value for Intel.

 

Read Matt’s perspective on our Data Center Strategy.

 

Chris, follow me on twitter

 

NPV Table. The net present value of receiving $1,500 cash five (5) years from today assuming a 10% annual rate of inflation is $931. NPV lookup table.JPG

1 Comments Permalink
1

I was recently involved in a project where Intel IT SMEs from disciplines including Server, Storage, Data Center, Network, and Finance reviewed and updated our Data Center Strategy (Intel IT Data Center Solutions: Strategies to Improve Efficiency) for Intel IT.  The primary focus of the paper was to provide an update on value realized, shifts in strategy, and key execution lessons learned.

 

Our execution highlighted the need for finance to participate as an active partner in the influence planning and internal communications.  At some point, especially in economically challenging environments, cross organization investment decisions boil down to a tradeoff between limited resources and a number of good projects. Being able to clearly articulate the value added by a "portfolio of projects" (like the Data Center Strategy) and how you will track progress doesn’t mean that the project(s) will be funded – but it does increase the likelihood that you will be in the game at the end.  For us, having this coordinated communication strategy for technology solutions,cost efficiency, and operational efficiency was a key consideration for successful execution. 

 

We currently estimate that the cumulative projected financial impact over eight years will be ~$500-650M NPV - this range has changed in upper and lower limits based on updates to forecasts.  Over the first three years, Intel IT has realized ~31% of the projected benefits through execution to the Data Center strategy.  The primary value driver has been the impact of our server strategies (multi-core refresh and virtualization) that enable demand growth within the existing data center footprint and affordability targets.  Moving into 2010, we are evaluating new forecasting and value metrics to enhance customer reporting of data center activities.  This approach will incorporate our activity driver methodology into comprehensive unit costing and forecasting framework, creating a holistic cost forecasting process to improve future decision making.

 

One area currently under review is establishing the right unit of measure for a data center infrastructure housing different compute environments.  Is this something you or your business partners are exploring or looking to explore?

1 Comments Permalink
1

Hello community,

 

Since this is my first blog on this site so I thought it would be nice to introduce myself. My name is Brian McCann and I'm an Automation Engineer at Intel that focuses on platforms support. In short this means I'm in the trenches everyday supporting Intel's manufacturing environment. This blog is going to be focused on sharing my tools and best practices when managing a server environment, it is not going to be a sales and marketing blog...sorry to disappoint. My interests are hardware and software...in fact I'm a little biased toward Microsoft since I've supported Microsoft environments for some time now. If you want to find out a little more about me feel free to visit my other blog where I focus most of those blogs on Active Directory. Hopefully you'll like what you see here and come back for more.

 

 

Today I wanted to share with you a tool that will help simplify the management of your servers...especially if you have a lot of servers to manage like I do. Its name is VisionApp Remote Desktop and it is a great freeware program to manage Windows servers. I've always disliked the built-in MMC snap-in Remote Desktops. It is a very simple tool that is only good for managing about ten servers. Like you, I manage way more than ten servers. This tool has the following benefits to help you manage those remote desktop sessions:

 

  • Sort Servers Alphabetically (This made me so angry that I couldn't do this with Microsoft's Remote Desktop MMC. When you have to manage a lot of servers it is a pain when you add new ones that follow a naming convention that now fall out of order)

  • Create folders to help sort different types of servers (I created folders for my Production, Integration, Development and Virtual servers. This has made it extremely easy to find what I'm looking for.)

  • Tabbed Remote Desktops (Tabs are huge right now and this tool takes full advantage of them. I can now open several different types of servers from different folders and access them via the tabs on the top.)

 

Hopefully this tool relieves some of the stress you have when managing your environment. I have plenty of tools and best practices stored up so let me know what you think about them. Also if you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask.

1 Comments Permalink