Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > Intel Premier IT Professional Zone > Blog > Tags > virtualization

IPIP Community Blog

14 Posts tagged with the virtualization tag
0

Let's face it–the Intel® Xeon® processor is the world's most widely deployed server for a good reason. IT has grown to rely on Intel Xeon processors for their performance, reliability, virtualization capabilities, and a whole lot more.

And at this week's Intel Developer Forum (IDF) in San Francisco, Intel Senior Fellow Stephen Pawlowski took the stage to discuss the next generation of Intel Xeon processors, codenamed Nehalem-EX. "We've had a number of customers who have come to us and said, 'we want to be able to use Xeon and also the mission critical segment.  What kinds of things or what kinds of capabilities can you put in there?'" spoke Pawlowski in his IDF session. The answer? Intel is throwing a whole lot at Nehalem-EX, all but the kitchen sink.

Designed for mission-critical performance, RAS, along with hardware-based virtualization, Nehalem-EX has got an industry-standard server makeover, with the ability to monitor, report, and recover from hardware errors to maintain data integrity and keep mission-critical services online. And that's just the half of it. With Nehalem-EX, IT and business knows that they've got a solid roadmap they can rely on for years to come.

Nehalem-EX also offers scalability along with world-record virtualization performance, enabling the highest consolidation ratios of any industry-standard server. And as IT departments across the board move to lower costs while increasing hardware utilization, Intel has responded to their needs by improving and enhancing its hardware-based virtualization technology.

Including broad industry support for an era that is increasingly moving towards the cloud, virtualization technology combined with energy-efficient performance and RAS-rich environments provide a reliable, scalable environment that IT departments can bank on. 

Get more on Stephen Pawlowski's IDF session by visiting http://tinyurl.com/ycacf2c

0 Comments Permalink
0

Thanks to everyone who shared their IT best practices through the Intel Premier IT Knowledge Award program.  Judges from Intel and CXO Media poured over the very qualified submissions and had the hard job of narrowing to a handful of finalists.  Two awards (one for management of client fleet, one for data center) will be chosen by a panel of judges from Intel and CXO Media.  One additional award winner will be chosen by the IT community members of Intel Premier IT Professional via online voting.

So it's your turn. 

Users can find the link to vote on http://ipip.intel.com

For those who are not program members, membership is free and takes just a few minutes. You'll also stay up-to-date with best practices and technology insights online, in publications and local events.

The Intel Premier IT Knowledge Awards program was designed to recognize and reward North American IT managers/groups who have generated best practices, driving business value and innovation.   

The finalists represent diversity of business size, type, and solutions deployed using Intel architecture.

 

Data Center Management

Applied Materials

HD Supply

RichRelevance

Toyota Motor Sales, Inc.

Client Fleet Management

Hay Group

Our Kids of Miami-Dade/Monroe, Inc. 

Polycom, Inc.

Raleigh Pediatrics Associates

 

Award winners will receive industry recognition in an upcoming issue of CIO magazine as well as invited guest at either the CIO 100 Symposium and Awards or the CIO: The Year Ahead event. 

 

Let us know who your favorite IT hero is. 

0 Comments Permalink
0

The April 1 issue of CIO magazine stressed the importance of “Marketing IT to the Business.” Per the call to "innovate and communicate," you can also market your projects via industrywide recognition.  Which brings me to the Premier IT Awards, where we’re a few weeks to the end of our call for submissions.

 

CIO custom solutions group and Intel have been receiving numerous IT department submissions from around North America that demonstrate best practices in data center or client fleet management.    Grassroots IT innovation and dedication to driving business value.  The submissions span projects valued from $10K to $2.5M, from customers with in-house vs. managed data centers and client solutions.   Intel products at the center of these solutions include not just Intel Core 2 processors with vPro technology or Intel Xeon processor-based servers, but Intel Itanium processor-based servers, Intel XScale technology and devices.

Just a few examples of our diverse submissions include a:

-Law firm

-Leading transportation company

-State government

-Non-profit healthcare network

-Managed service providers with small/medium business customers

-One of Fortune magazine 100 Best Companies to Work For

 

The short list of contenders for the awards will be posted on the Intel Premier IT Professional site soon.  And you’ll have the chance to vote for the “people’s choice” winner if you’re a member (it’s free to join).

 

If you think you’re too small or your industry doesn’t lend itself to driving business value because you’re state/local government or a nonprofit, I encourage you to think again.  Submit your best practices.  For more information visit the program website or if you have any questions, ask me here.

0 Comments Permalink
2

CIO magazine has received some great submissions from IT organizations for the Intel Premier IT Awards.  Stellar examples of best practices in client fleet and data center management.  But some of you, literally dozens, have incomplete drafts waiting to be submitted for award consideration. 

 

With the deadline for submission May 29, 2009 getting closer, I ask you: If you've come this far, what's keeping you from getting your submission to the finish line? And if you haven't considered submitting for the award ... why not?

 

Winning submissions for client fleet management and data center management as well as a "people's choice" winner will be profiled in CIO magazine.  Plus, a winner in each category will also be CIO magazine's guest at the CIO 100 Symposium & Awards or CIO: The Year Ahead events.  And a recogntion plaque for your company or office.  Eligible nominees are North American IT end-user organizations.

 

At our Intel Premier IT events, on Open Port, and elsewhere, we hear loud and clear from you that these are challenging times for IT.  And, in conjunction with CIO magazine, we'd love to provide some honor and recognition for the work you've done.

 

If you have a question about eligiblity or other critera, ask away.  To paraphrase a TV doctor: "Hello, IT.  We're listening."  And we hope to hear from you, here or through the official award website: http://www.premieritawards.com

2 Comments Permalink
2

In our previous post, A Silent Revolution in the Information Technology Industry we observed that the cycle time to implement and deliver a business application has been steadily decreasing over the past fifty years from several years at the dawn of computing to a few weeks or faster today.

 

This acceleration of delivery by two or three orders of magnitude is a byproduct a rapidly evolving and maturing current IT infrastructure.

 

The acceleration comes from the use of pre-built components and our ability to schedule data, applications and compute engines separately, sourcing these resources to the places and methods of lowest cost. We also discovered that this phenomenon is not unique to IT.  Most mature industries have become service integrators taking advantage of pre-existing services. In the example of our previous blog entry,  it would be foolish a car insurance company wishing to build national coverage to start building a network of car repair shops.  Car insurance companies avail themselves of existing car repair shops, and it would be preposterous to think otherwise.

 

Yet when we think about IT for a large organization, we don't think twice about hundreds of millions of dollars spent in vertically integrated infrastructure, tens of thousands of square feet in huge data centers housing thousands of servers, many of them performing no more than file serving functions and most of the time woefully underutilized.

 

Under these circumstances it is no surprise that in spite of the proliferation of outsourced services in the past ten years or so, IT is still primarily a privilege for large organizations.  It could be argued that this state of affairs is a side effect of the large granularity of IT resources:  A 10-employee business may not be able to afford to purchase and maintain a collection of servers, each one dedicated to an application and the associated in house expertise.

 

Cloud computing is changing the dynamics of application integration and delivery very fast.  Service providers in the internet are beginning to offer fine grained services that obviate the need of a large up front capital investment by service consumers:  it is no longer necessary to purchase a complete server for data storage even if only a small fraction is used.  Storage can be rented fromthe cloud by the gigabyte per month.  Virtualization has made it possible for service providers to offer a fractional server for rent for much less than what an in house physical server would cost.

 

The benefit accrues not only to end user service consumers.  It is lowering the cost for new service provider entrants in the market addressing niches that were not profitable before.  The Mozy backup service and the Pi Corporation data presence services, recent acquisitions by EMC constitute examples of this new trend.

 

A consumer may pay just a few dollars a month for a cloud based storage service.  This is an example of an IT service scaled down to the consumer market.  Instantiating a service takes just a few mouse clicks and a credit card or a Pay Pal funds transfer.  Compare this process with the status quo of an "in-house" deployment:

TraditionalBackup.png

The poor consumer is required to research trade publications and the Internet and identify a suitable backup product.  The consumer purchases the product from a software vendor and installs it in the target machine.  Once installed, the consumer is required to follow an onerous regime of regular backups.

 

Even when the backups are scheduled the user needs to be aware of a number of contingencies, such as ensuring the machines are up and running at the time of the scheduled backup, and if the backup is done to a network shared drive, to also ensure that the connection is in working order and that the target machine is up and running.

 

If the unthinkable happens and there is a problem with the primary drive, some consumers may not have the expertise to perform the repair and recovery and may need to hire a technician at significant cost.   Even with this hired expertise, horror of horrors, the consumer may find out in this dire moment that backups are missing or done improperly leading to partial or total data loss.

 

What is wrong with this picture?  First, the end user is being used as the point of integration for the IT process.  We have come to accept this situation in an IT context by sheer habit.  It would be unacceptable in any other context: would a customer hire a taxi that requires the customer to drive the vehicle?

 

In our next post we will use a constructive proof of how to build a consumer backup service using more primitive component services.

 

Using a similar approach, the lowered integration services will not only benefit the consumer end user, but also will create opportunities for service delivery in emerging markets.  The fine grained component resources that the cloud makes possible, will enable a new generation of service providers in these markets delivering services specifically tailored for these markets.  The potential economic benefit of this new paradigm is potentially enormous.

2 Comments Permalink
0

Can your IT group "bring it" with best practices in client fleet and data center management? If you're willing to share your BKMs, CIO magazine may recognize you in their May 2009 issue.  The winners will be chosen by CIO and Intel judges, plus a "people's choice" selected by members of Intel Premier IT Professional (ipip.intel.com) and will be profiled in a spread in CIO magazine.  Deadline is February 12.  Learn more at www.premieritawards.com

0 Comments Permalink
0

I had the opportunity to speak at the Gartner Symposium ITExpo in Orlando a few weeks ago on the Intel technology roadmap. The interesting wrinkle was that I was introduced by a Gartner analyst who set the scene for the presentation by listing Gartners top 10 list of strategic technologies for 2009. This list had been presented by Carl Claunch and David Cearley the previous day, and you should be able to access more details on Gartner's website. Here's the list:

 

1. Virtualization

2. Cloud Computing

3. Servers: Beyond Blades

4. Web-Oriented Architectures

5. Enterprise Mashups

6. Specialized Systems

7. Social Software and Social Networking

8. Unified Networking

9. Business Intelligence

10. Green IT

 

What struck me is that there are groups at Intel that are deeply involved in every one of these areas, even the software items. As well, almost every one of these technologies is heavily dependent on silicon and hardware technology. For example, the standard technology roadmap presentation that we give at IPIP events covers virtualization, cloud computing, server architecture, specialized systems, social software, business intelligence and green IT, to different degrees of detail.

 

Cloud computing was particularly interesting. It's clear that Gartner has given the topic a lot of thought, and they have their own segmentation diagram that rivals the complexity of any I've seen so far . We'll cover this one specifically in another blog.

 

Rick

 

 

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
0

 

You may recall Nicholas G Carr for his classic Harvard Business Review article about the commoditization of IT.

 

 

In his recent book The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google quoted in Bill Snyder's CIO Magazine article he claims data centers will become obsolete with the adoption of cloud computing.

 

 

Looking beyond the hyperbole, my thought is that as the cloud is adopted in the industry, patterns of ownership for data centers will change. The situation won't be black and white, that is, either corporate owned data centers or everything in the cloud.

 

 

To the extent that corporate applications have a modular architecture, what we'll see is a gradual outsourcing of non-critical application components to cloud resources. Corporate owned data centers may become smaller, but servers that otherwise would have been there will be purchased by the outsourcing provider. This is consistent with of efficient markets. Coase argues that an optimizing process is at work where the size of an organization (or a data center in this case) is the result of finding the balance between competing tendencies ("transaction costs").

 

 

It is hard to believe that data centers will disappear. Companies may decide that their crown jewel applications and data are better run in house. However, to the extent that these applications are modular and federated, non-critical components or components not associated with LOB will be outsourced. Fewer servers will be needed to run the applications, leading to smaller data centers.

 

 

The servers needed to run the non-critical functions will not go away; the will be owned (or leased) by the outsourcing provider. These servers will run in a highly optimized, multi-tenant and virtualized environment. The overal effect is that resource usage is optimized over the whole ecosystem.

 

 

In this outsourced, multi-tenant environment, manageability and monitoring capabilities become paramount, including the conveyance of metadata across multiple logical levels and the ability to provide multiple logical views to support iron clad SLAs.

 

Virtualization as an essential ingredient to make the cloud work because it allows applications and their hosts to be scheduled independently. The article also brings issues of security and transparency standing in the way of the cloud. More than a fundamental roadblock, these issues are a function of industry maturity, and it is reasonable to expect that they will be eventually addressed once the outsourced resources become quantifiable with respect to the businesses served.

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
3

If you attended the Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco on September 22-24, you may have stumbled upon Booth 425 in the Eco-Technology Community. The theme of the booth was Energy Efficient Data Center Power Management with Windows Server* 2008 Hyper-V* and Intel* Dynamic Power Technologies. The demo was a joint project between Microsoft and Intel to showcase the integration of power management features supported by Windows Server 2008 and Intel-based platforms in a virtualized environment.

 

Logically, development work for the demo consisted in integrating four main technology ingredients: server hardware based on the Bensley platform provisioned with Harpertown CPUs, firmware running on the baseboard of the managed nodes known as Node Manager, virtualized instances of the Microsoft Windows* Server 2008 operating system running on top of the same OS with the Hyper-V virtualization role enabled and a management console application built by Intel, Data Center Manager (DCM).

 

The relationship between the technology components is shown in the figure below:

 

 

I would like to share my personal experience in putting together this demo, an angle not always obvious when looking at the finished product. Personal means people. Let me introduce you to some of the really nice people who participated in the project. This is only a very small portion of the team, so I will apologize up front to team participants not represented here for lack of space.

 

Here is Susmita Nayak , based in California, who officiated as the project manager greeting some of the booth visitors:

 

 

... and here is Haim Cohen, a software engineer based inthe Israel Design Center and yours truly, a technical architect and chief gopher, part of the Oregon team.

 

 

 

The next picture captures an overall view of the booth. It is a pre-conference picture when the setup was almost finished. You may notice the empty boxes, cabling not yet hidden and the rack of servers discreetly tucked on the side. Don't be swayed by rack's apparent small size. The whole rig weighs about 400 pounds (200 kilos). It was shipped to the conference site prefabricated, in one piece. Racking the servers would take about half a day of lifting, bolting, rewiring and sanity testing, which we decided not to do at the conference site.

 

 

 

 

The demo consisted in four 5U SC5400 managed nodes with a S5000PSL (Star Lake) baseboards running Windows Server 2008 with Hyper-V and hardware virtualization support turned on. The management console server consisted of a S5000PAL baseboard on a 2U chassis running Microsoft Windows Server* 2003. The logic block diagram of the rig is shown below. The configuration of the nodes was similar; node 1 has been expanded for detail.

 

 

 

 

In addition to the main CPU, the S5000PSL baseboard carries a baseboard management controller (BMC). The BMC is an embedded computer. Node Manager is firmware that runs on the BMC. Data Center Manager actually communicates with the BMC to carry its functions using the server's Ethernet interface. The BMC supports a TCP/IP stack and carries an IP address separate from the CPU. This is necessary to support bare metal management capabilities. The server platform has an instrumented power supply providing real time readouts of the server power consumption. The information is carried through an out-of-band (OOB) network in the baseboard.

 

 

Finally, here is the console display of Data Center Manager:

 

 

 

 

Data Center Manager supports the notion of logical groups. In the picture above the the four servers were placed in two groups, namely Group 1 with one servers and Group 2 with three servers. The graph shows the power consumption over time of server named "Win11". On the left side, the graph starts with the server idling. The workload used in this demo is SPECpower. There are four instances of Microsoft Windows* Server in each physical machine, also running Microsoft Windows* Server 2008. The graph shows an idling power of about 160 watts. SPECpower was scripted to go through a calibration period of a few minutes and then settling at about 50% CPU utilization. Power consumption is proportional to the workload. Hence we see power peaking at 247 watts for a few minutes and settling at 219 watts thereafter. For a more detailed walkthrough of the demo, please take a look at Dialing in your Datacenter - using Intel Dynamic Power Datacenter Manager.

 

 

There were quite a few challenges in integrating the various technology components. Windows Server 2008 however, was a standout; its behavior was rock solid throughout in spite of being a recently introduced product. I never experienced hangs with the Hyper-V manager and the system was always good at saying what it was doing. These positive behaviors contributed to the general sense of robustness. A system configured with four virtual machines requires about 120 GB of hard drive space and 8 GB of main memory.

 

 

I found Windows Server 2008 very easy to install. Support for the newer platform features was right out of the box. On the other hand I had to tweak the BIOS SATA controller settings into legacy mode before the installation of Windows Server for Windows Server 2003 could proceed. The administrative functions for Hyper-V such as replicating virtual machines were easy to carry out, with Hyper-V Manager taking care of fixing the MAC addresses and SIDs in the clones.

 

 

 

 

3 Comments Permalink
4

As I sit back and think of some of the newer technologies we have looked at recently, I find myself wondering if IT is in the never ending cycle of re-inventing the wheel. What I mean by this is sometimes it seems as if we continue to try and re-engineer everything to make it fit our environment or how we think it should work. When viewing newer technologies, usage models and trying to pass data off to other groups the phrases I think I hear the most are, “That will never work in our environment,” or “If we can get them to change this, this and this, we may be able to use it here” or my favorite, “This will never be secure enough for us to use it as it exists”. While these may be valid assessments against the way we do things today, the big question is: should we be pushing ourselves to look for new ways of doing things? Five years ago, employees preferred to use their machines and software loads supplied by IT because they were more powerful or feature rich than anything they had at home. But in today’s society, people have higher end machines at home than IT supplies them. They also use newer technologies that are usually off limits or not supported by IT. Think of some of the tools we use today, such as this blog or even instant messaging. These technologies exist in our corporate environment because we saw people using them at home and brought them into our corporate environment. It wasn’t something that IT created and people took home to use. So with so many of these newer technologies out there, should we keep pushing to make them adapt to our IT world, or should we start pushing IT to start adapting to new models. We take umbrella approaches to everything today. Total security of the platform, instead of trying to reduce the footprint we have to manage. We look for solutions that will cover the majority of the users, versus what may be right for smaller enclaves. We place several management clients on the platform to perform numerous tasks instead of using native components or reducing some of the redundant requirements we have. Moving forward, the next generation of workers will expect businesses to offer familiar technology and won’t accept tradition as an excuse. IT shops need to provide workers with “cool” ways to work. If they don’t, they risk becoming obsolete.

4 Comments Permalink
0

Present day enterprise computing may involve thousands of interconnected computers. Users benefiting from the operation of these machines may not even be aware of the vast scale of this infrastructure; the system just "works". This is computing in the large, the enterprise IT equivalent of the cosmological superclusters.

 

These enterprise computing superclusters exhibit certain patterns and behaviors that can be understood through the integration of three very well established technologies, virtualization, service orientation and grid computing. We call the collective representation of these superclusters "virtual service oriented grids" or VSGs for short.

 

 

If you take this trio of technologies one at a time, they're old news. Research on virtualization goes back to the early 1960s and the same holds true for SOA if we go back to its roots in object oriented programming. Grids were started in the late 80s, but if we take their high performance computing context, they go back to the dawn of electronic computing in the early 1940s.

 

 

Together these three powerful technologies define a new information technology model that will fundamentally change the way we do business. It is not because we'll be able to bring up wonderful new applications to market. That's only the beginning. These technologies allow the development of applications in a federated fashion using service modules that we call "servicelets". The difference is that these federated or composite applications can be built orders of magnitude faster than traditional, single-vendor applications. This new environment will open opportunities for thousands of smaller players worldwide.

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
0

This week, we'll have guest Intel blogger Enrique Castro-Leon, Enterprise and Data Center Architect and Technology Strategist. As a preface I'd like to share the preface from the forthcoming Intel Press book Enrique has co-authored, "The Business Value of Service Oriented Grids." The preface (also in our resources area) tees up the history that brought us to service oriented grids and an industry example of how using virtualization and service orientation can help a mature business. If you'd like more, let us know you're reading and give us a shout.

 

And don't forget our other guest blogging by the Intel Business Exchange managers this week.

0 Comments Permalink
1

Hank Lea & Josh Hilliker were out in Denver & are doing a recap of the conference on Blog Talk Radio this week. Josh and Hank will share topics such as client and server virtualization including a few key audio interviews with Citrix, Sun & Intel. Visit the Blog Talk Radio site, bring your questions for the broadcast and join us "Live" on-line, Monday, July 21st, 11:00AM Pacific time.

1 Comments Permalink
2

2008 Server Roadmap

Posted by Rick White May 29, 2008

In my previous blog I talked about some of the Intel's key technology advances, including 45nm high-k metal gate technology and our core microarchitecture.

 

Technology is providing tremendous benefits to IT

 

Now let's see how we apply these and other technologies to our server roadmap.

 

We've recently changed our segmentation strategy for servers - instead of segmenting by number of sockets (1S, 2S, 4S ...) we focus on an end user based model. The new categories are Entry Level (most cost effective for entry servers), Efficient Performance (focus on power effiency and ability to scale out), Expandable (more memory, more I/O, scale up) and Mission Critical (highest availability and scalability)

 

 

2008 is the "tock" in our "tick tock" model where we introduce our new microarchitecture code-named "Nehalem". Some of the new innovations include an integrated memory controller and 2-way simultaneous multithreading. Quick Path Interconnect dramatically increases the bandwidth of the platform, and there are a number of new features to reduce energy consumption. The Efficient Performance version of Nehalem is a 2 socket quad core platform using 45nm technology.

 

 

In the Expandable segment we introduce our "Dunnington" 6 core processor, which is socket compatable with current four socket platforms. More cores, more cache, more memory, more I/O makes this a great platform for consolidation and virtualization. Speaking of virtualization, this is another key technology in Intel platforms. VT (vritualization technology) is now available in all Intel server platforms, and enables virtualization of both the processor and the I/O subsystem. Our Flex Migration feature enables the live migration of virtual machines between processors of different vintages, incresasing the flexibility of virtualization deployments.

 

 

Mission critical systems based on the Intel Itanium processor need a massive amount of resources in order to scale to the highest processor and core counts to get maximum performance. The next-generation processor code-named "Tukwila" will provide multiple cores and resources in a chip with over two billion transistors. These systems incorporate the next-generation Intel QuickPath Interconnect to support reliability and additional performance.

 

 

Here are a couple of links to examples of customer success stories with quad core processors and 45nm technology

Case Study: Quad-Core Processors Pass the Test at Cornell University

Case Study: Sohu.com Powers the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games* Official Website

2 Comments Permalink