Home > Intel Communities > Open Port IT Community > Intel Premier IT Professional Zone > Blog > Tags > manageability

IPIP Community Blog

7 Posts tagged with the manageability tag
0

Thanks to everyone who shared their IT best practices through the Intel Premier IT Knowledge Award program.  Judges from Intel and CXO Media poured over the very qualified submissions and had the hard job of narrowing to a handful of finalists.  Two awards (one for management of client fleet, one for data center) will be chosen by a panel of judges from Intel and CXO Media.  One additional award winner will be chosen by the IT community members of Intel Premier IT Professional via online voting.

So it's your turn. 

Users can find the link to vote on http://ipip.intel.com

For those who are not program members, membership is free and takes just a few minutes. You'll also stay up-to-date with best practices and technology insights online, in publications and local events.

The Intel Premier IT Knowledge Awards program was designed to recognize and reward North American IT managers/groups who have generated best practices, driving business value and innovation.   

The finalists represent diversity of business size, type, and solutions deployed using Intel architecture.

 

Data Center Management

Applied Materials

HD Supply

RichRelevance

Toyota Motor Sales, Inc.

Client Fleet Management

Hay Group

Our Kids of Miami-Dade/Monroe, Inc. 

Polycom, Inc.

Raleigh Pediatrics Associates

 

Award winners will receive industry recognition in an upcoming issue of CIO magazine as well as invited guest at either the CIO 100 Symposium and Awards or the CIO: The Year Ahead event. 

 

Let us know who your favorite IT hero is. 

0 Comments Permalink
0

The April 1 issue of CIO magazine stressed the importance of “Marketing IT to the Business.” Per the call to "innovate and communicate," you can also market your projects via industrywide recognition.  Which brings me to the Premier IT Awards, where we’re a few weeks to the end of our call for submissions.

 

CIO custom solutions group and Intel have been receiving numerous IT department submissions from around North America that demonstrate best practices in data center or client fleet management.    Grassroots IT innovation and dedication to driving business value.  The submissions span projects valued from $10K to $2.5M, from customers with in-house vs. managed data centers and client solutions.   Intel products at the center of these solutions include not just Intel Core 2 processors with vPro technology or Intel Xeon processor-based servers, but Intel Itanium processor-based servers, Intel XScale technology and devices.

Just a few examples of our diverse submissions include a:

-Law firm

-Leading transportation company

-State government

-Non-profit healthcare network

-Managed service providers with small/medium business customers

-One of Fortune magazine 100 Best Companies to Work For

 

The short list of contenders for the awards will be posted on the Intel Premier IT Professional site soon.  And you’ll have the chance to vote for the “people’s choice” winner if you’re a member (it’s free to join).

 

If you think you’re too small or your industry doesn’t lend itself to driving business value because you’re state/local government or a nonprofit, I encourage you to think again.  Submit your best practices.  For more information visit the program website or if you have any questions, ask me here.

0 Comments Permalink
2

CIO magazine has received some great submissions from IT organizations for the Intel Premier IT Awards.  Stellar examples of best practices in client fleet and data center management.  But some of you, literally dozens, have incomplete drafts waiting to be submitted for award consideration. 

 

With the deadline for submission May 29, 2009 getting closer, I ask you: If you've come this far, what's keeping you from getting your submission to the finish line? And if you haven't considered submitting for the award ... why not?

 

Winning submissions for client fleet management and data center management as well as a "people's choice" winner will be profiled in CIO magazine.  Plus, a winner in each category will also be CIO magazine's guest at the CIO 100 Symposium & Awards or CIO: The Year Ahead events.  And a recogntion plaque for your company or office.  Eligible nominees are North American IT end-user organizations.

 

At our Intel Premier IT events, on Open Port, and elsewhere, we hear loud and clear from you that these are challenging times for IT.  And, in conjunction with CIO magazine, we'd love to provide some honor and recognition for the work you've done.

 

If you have a question about eligiblity or other critera, ask away.  To paraphrase a TV doctor: "Hello, IT.  We're listening."  And we hope to hear from you, here or through the official award website: http://www.premieritawards.com

2 Comments Permalink
2

As I go and talk to different SMBs across the country about different technologies, I always get the same question: “What technology is currently available that a lot of SMB companies in industry ‘X’ are using to provide a better customer experience.” Everyone knows that this is a loaded question and there is no silver bullet when it comes to exceeding your customer’s expectations. I try and have SMBs look at it from the end customer’s point of view.

First, what is the experience like when customers first interact with your company? If the process to learn about your company's product or service takes longer than 60 seconds to describe on the phone, SMBs will go to another provider. So ask the question, is my organization’s employees equipped to explain our companies product/service value to a new customer within 60 seconds. From a technology point of view that involves having the appropriate systems in place to support any questions the new customer might ask (i.e. making sure all pertinent data can be accessed by your customer support team). In addition, you need to make sure that your systems are fast enough to access this data very quickly. I have talked with numerous SMBs that have a great product & services information databases established for their employees to access however, the employees don’t use the system because it takes tool long for their system to bring up the needed information.

Second, do your employees have the needed resources to follow up on new customer requests? These resources not only revolved around data associated to customer inquires/needs, it also involves the needed time for your company representatives to follow up with the new customers. I have talked to some customers and they say that for every hour their computer systems are not available, they are losing at least 3 new customer opportunities. As a result, there are more companies making scheduled maintenance updates to the employee’s systems in off-ours. One customer specifically, Midwest Eye Consultants, is implementing new technology that is saving them 10 to 12 worker-hours a month on system maintenance and those extra hours are now being used by company employees to recruit new customers. Click here to see more information about the technology Midwest Eye Consultants have implemented: http://msp.intel.com/midwest-eyes-case-study.pdf

Lastly, does your internal team have the resources available to support existing customers? Most of the time the resources that matter the most for existing customers relate to past product/services they have received from your company. If this information is not readily available when your team is servicing an existing customer, it can mean keeping or losing a loyal customer. In the health care field it is even more critical. Northwest Newborn specialist relies on customer/patient data being available at all times of the day. Carolyn Kraus from Northwest Newborn Specialist says: “Our physicians can be impatient, and with good reason. They’re on 24/7 in a high-stress job where downtime can have serious consequences, and much of their work is done through technology. When a PC goes down, they can’t access patient records, look at an x-ray over the network, or pass on their notes to the next physician on-call. In this field, it’s critical to keep their stress level low and their PCs up and running.” Click here to find out more information  about the new technology Northwest Newborn Specialist is using: http://msp.intel.com/NW%20Newborn%20Specialists_final_318134-001US.pdf

In closing, when you think about what technology you need to provide a better customer experience, think about what you have implemented in your environment today. Do you have quick and efficient systems set up that enable your team to deal with first time customers and all the questions they may have about your company’s products & services? In addition, do your teams have up to date systems available any time during the work day to deal with follow up activities related to new customers? Also, do you have the right system managed infrastructure in place so that your desktops and notebooks will be available to support all existing customer requests during all hours of the work day? The answers to these three basic questions provide the best direction for your company to explore in order to provide a better overall customer experience.

2 Comments Permalink
0

 

You may recall Nicholas G Carr for his classic Harvard Business Review article about the commoditization of IT.

 

 

In his recent book The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google quoted in Bill Snyder's CIO Magazine article he claims data centers will become obsolete with the adoption of cloud computing.

 

 

Looking beyond the hyperbole, my thought is that as the cloud is adopted in the industry, patterns of ownership for data centers will change. The situation won't be black and white, that is, either corporate owned data centers or everything in the cloud.

 

 

To the extent that corporate applications have a modular architecture, what we'll see is a gradual outsourcing of non-critical application components to cloud resources. Corporate owned data centers may become smaller, but servers that otherwise would have been there will be purchased by the outsourcing provider. This is consistent with of efficient markets. Coase argues that an optimizing process is at work where the size of an organization (or a data center in this case) is the result of finding the balance between competing tendencies ("transaction costs").

 

 

It is hard to believe that data centers will disappear. Companies may decide that their crown jewel applications and data are better run in house. However, to the extent that these applications are modular and federated, non-critical components or components not associated with LOB will be outsourced. Fewer servers will be needed to run the applications, leading to smaller data centers.

 

 

The servers needed to run the non-critical functions will not go away; the will be owned (or leased) by the outsourcing provider. These servers will run in a highly optimized, multi-tenant and virtualized environment. The overal effect is that resource usage is optimized over the whole ecosystem.

 

 

In this outsourced, multi-tenant environment, manageability and monitoring capabilities become paramount, including the conveyance of metadata across multiple logical levels and the ability to provide multiple logical views to support iron clad SLAs.

 

Virtualization as an essential ingredient to make the cloud work because it allows applications and their hosts to be scheduled independently. The article also brings issues of security and transparency standing in the way of the cloud. More than a fundamental roadblock, these issues are a function of industry maturity, and it is reasonable to expect that they will be eventually addressed once the outsourced resources become quantifiable with respect to the businesses served.

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
3

As I sit here fresh from a leadership conference for IT employees, I find myself thinking about that. Does IT need radical change? After hearing several examples of how people engineered solutions to solve specific problems or reviewed projects they had developed over the past year, I can answer with a definite yes. While it wasn’t simply this experience that pushed me to realization, it definitely helped complete the pattern I had noticed in today’s IT.

 

I spend most of my normal role investigating and researching emerging and next generation technologies. With this role came many headaches from pounding my head against the wall of established processes, procedures and preconceived notions. But to borrow an idea from Gene Meieran, that is simply the toll I am paying on this road to my success. But I look at this and ask a simple question, why?

 

When pushing to adopt a new technology, why do we have to wait until it meets all of our established requirements? Why do we try to make vendor’s products adapt to us, versus us considering the possibility to adapt to them? Why does it take us 2 years to adopt a new operating system or major product? Why do we run projects for 18-24 months to implement a product that exists out on the shelf today? In looking at several examples of what people consider successful products today, I look to see what makes them different, attractive, and a must have. I then ask what would it take to make IT different, attractive and a must have for any corporation.

 

Five or six years ago, people came to work and looked to IT to get the latest hardware, OS and innovations, because we had it here. We spent the dollars and time to solve problems and innovate. But in the last few years, people have adopted technology must faster at home than we do at work. They use the iPhone, a Wii, social networking tools, cloud based services, etc. They are enabled at home with more options than we provide as an IT shop. We use instant messaging in IT, not because we developed it as a way to eliminate small emails, but because instant messaging was a consumer product that grew so fast, that IT had to adopt it. Social networking is doing the same thing. So I wonder, what would it take to get IT back ahead of the curve and become an enabler of new ideas and solutions, rather than an implementer & reinventer of existing technology?

 

We need to get back to freethinking and innovation that is core to our roots. Companies like Intel were founded on thoughts like the famous quote from Robert Noyce – “Don’t be encumbered by the past, go out and do something wonderful” yet in our day to day life I see many encumbered by the past and am waiting for the wonderful. We choose solutions that have more of the one size fits all. Instead of picking the best solutions for the roles that exist; we try to find the one item that can solve all of our problems. Rather than choosing the optimal product for the “one size”, we should look at the product that enables the end user to perform optimally. Imagined if corporations took this approach with their products. Image a shoe manufacture that developed the one size fits all. It would be an opened toe, ¾ shank athletic tread, men’s size 10, 3-inch heel, sneaker pump. It would meet most of the needs of the shoe-wearing world, but wouldn’t be the right shoe for many, if anyone. So why do we settle for the same model in IT? We need to be innovative. We need to look at Apple, Google, Nintendo and others. They didn’t just develop products that do what everyone else’s products do today, but they did them differently & in many cases better. What does it take to make your part of IT the next iPod, iPhone or Wii? How can we enable our partners to perform optimally? What does it take to just go out and do something without worrying about how many existing committees; review boards, processes and groups have to be engaged to just get it going? The answer is radical change. We need to change how we work. We need to change the level of control we have today. We need to shrink what we try to manage. We need to strive to enable the partners versus totally control their work life. We need to ask so what every once in a while. When someone says if we do A then B might happen. Ask the question, so what? We spend all this time doing the day-to-day moving from spot to spot, never worrying about the resources, costs and effort put into the status quo. When we try to implement something new, it goes under the microscope and quite often is held to a different standard than existing solutions. Requirements seem to be a never-ending monster of growth, instead of the simple point-by-point items they should be for solutions. Many times the solutions themselves are actually listed as the requirements. So I challenge us all to start a process of Radical Change. Start asking the question So What? Start pushing back on the status quo, quit being encumbered and start a process of innovation. Help your partners perform optimally and be a key part of their success rather than just one of their suppliers. It won’t be easy, it won’t always be fun, but it will be rewarding.

3 Comments Permalink
0

In a previous post, Virtual Service Oriented Grids: Scalable Enterprise Computing, I mentioned how the convergence of three old technologies is facilitating large scale computing in the enterprise. It is no coincidence that there are historical drivers for this transformation. In the IT world in the mid to late 1990s, you may recall that this was the era of eCommerce where most business activities under the sun became "Webified" and even the craziest ideas became capitalized. It as a boom which led to the inevitable bust. Some say it was triggered because work on the Millennium Bug stopped once the issue was "solved". No matter the reason, the momentum was unsustainable.

 

There was a lot of soul searching after the bust. Only a few survivors remain today, the most remarkable examples being Amazon.com, Google, Ebay and Yahoo. If there is one lesson coming from this period is that an essential element for sustainability is that Information Technology and Business need to be aligned.

 

 

The increasing adoption of Service Oriented Architectures or SOA represents the increasing recognition by IT organizations of the need for business and technology alignment. In fact, under SOA there is no difference between the two. The unit of delivery for SOA is a service, which is usually defined in business terms. In other words, SOA represents the up-leveling if IT, empowering IT organizations to meet the business needs of the community it serves. This up-leveling creates a gap, because for IT, eventually business requirements need to be translated into technology based solutions.

 

 

Our research indicates that this gap is being fulfilled by the resurgence of two very old technologies, namely virtualization and grid computing. To begin with, SOA allowed the de-coupling of data from applications through the magic of XML.

 

 

A lot of work that used to be done by application developers and integrators now gets done by computers. When most data centers run at 5 to 10 percent utilization, growing and deploying more data centers is not a good solution. Virtualization technology came very handy to address this situation, allowing the de-coupling of applications from the platforms in which they run. It acts as the gearbox in a car ensuring efficient transmission of power from the engine to the wheels.

 

 

The net effect of virtualization is that it allows utilization factors to go up in the 60 to 70%. The technique has been applied to mainframes for decades. Deploying virtualization to tens of thousands of servers has not been easy.

 

 

Finally, grid technology has allowed very fast, on the fly resource management, where resources are allocated not when a physical server is provisioned, but for each instance that a program is run.

 

 

Virtual service oriented grids represents the maturation of the three underlying technologies. The coming of age for a technology takes place whenever business, process and standardization become overriding considerations. Virtual service oriented grids rely heavily on standardization to attain interoperability, it is guided by governance at the corporate level, and are very much policy based and SLA driven. The underlying technologies become black boxes, their behavior defined by service level agreements (SLAs).

 

 

For any application, the management of the components is centralized, but the components ("servicelets") are assumed to be distributed. The servicelets are fungible and can be integrated in real time by design to allow applications to scale up and down, to be assembled and torn down as business conditions dictate.

 

 

In the next few entries we will go through a few examples. The subject is rich enough for a book, which indeed we have written. The book is scheduled for publication in September 2008 through Intel Press. Here is the book preface as a preview: New Book Excerpt from Intel Press: The Business Value of Service Oriented Grids.

 

 

0 Comments Permalink