<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Intel Communities: Message List - Memory selection for Xeon W5580</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:20:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.9 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-13T15:20:12Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory selection for Xeon W5580</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/46570?tstart=0#46570</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:9edd1b2b-ae4a-4e5b-a1d3-1c89cf801f9a] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Consolas;"&gt;Hi Ray,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: Consolas;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Consolas;"&gt;It gets down to tradeoffs between bandwidth, cost, and expandability.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Option 2 might be the best thing for you at this point as it's higher bandwidth than option #1 and a "balanced" configuration (as opposed to option #3).&lt;span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;We've been recommending a balanced configuration (same DIMM type, same population per channel) whenever possible, as configs such as your #3 may cause the effective bandwidth to drop down to option #2 levels (as measured by STREAM) due to how the memory controller works.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: Consolas;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Consolas;"&gt;With regards to your UDIMM question, using UDIMMs with ECC will likely be a lower cost option for 1GB and 2GB DIMMs.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;You still get memory ECC, and you still can run with DDR3 1333 when populating 1 DIMM per channel - populating all 6 DIMMs (2 DIMMs per channel) will drop the memory down to 1066 MHz.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Of course, you need to check with Dell on what they support and the costs.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: Consolas;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Consolas;"&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Ed&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:9edd1b2b-ae4a-4e5b-a1d3-1c89cf801f9a] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/46570?tstart=0#46570</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-07-13T06:04:15Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>4 months, 2 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Memory selection for Xeon W5580</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/44318?tstart=0#44318</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:2ed09364-811b-43db-ad33-d1809f012bd2] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have purchased a Dell T7500 workstation which has a single W5580 CPU and 6 DIMM slots available. I initially plan to run a 32-bit O/S on this particular PC but eventually will migrate it to a 64-bit O/S. My question concerns selecting the proper memory for it. Looking at the 5500 series memory rules it seems that if I were to populate all 6 DIMM slots the max memory speed will be reduced to 1066MHz (because there would be two DIMMs per channel). Thus to keep the option of running 1333MHz memory I would like to populate only 3 DIMM slots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since I initially am going to run a 32-bit O/S I only need to have about 4GB memory. So, between these configurations would I likely see any difference in system performance if I populate the DIMM slots like this (assume all DIMMs are 1333MHz):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) A single 4GB RDIMM (utilizes 1 channel - allows for 2 additional 4GB DIMMS later for a 64 bit O/S)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Two 2GB RDIMMs (utilizes 2 channels - allows 1 additional DIMM for 64 bit O/S)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) A 2GB RDIMM + two 1GB RDIMMS (utilizes 3 channels but would require replacing DIMMs to have more memory available)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, are there any advantages/drawbacks to using UDIMMs if I use only 3 DIMMS?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Ray&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:2ed09364-811b-43db-ad33-d1809f012bd2] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:10:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/44318?tstart=0#44318</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-07-10T16:10:11Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>4 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

