<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Intel Communities: Message List - Different versions of AMT out there?  KVM not available in 'standard'?</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/community/vproexpert?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Jive SBS 5.0.2.0  (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-17T19:04:23Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different versions of AMT out there?  KVM not available in 'standard'?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/154138?tstart=0#154138</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:16d6a957-87c6-4ea0-8c64-9015722f0c75] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;With just a quick glance at &lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://processormatch.intel.com/CompDB/SearchResult.aspx?BoardName=dq67ep" target="_blank"&gt;http://processormatch.intel.com/CompDB/SearchResult.aspx?BoardName=dq67ep&lt;/a&gt; and matching it up at &lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://ark.intel.com/products/53427/Intel-Core-i3-2120T-Processor-(3M-Cache-2_60-GHz)" target="_blank"&gt;http://ark.intel.com/products/53427/Intel-Core-i3-2120T-Processor-(3M-Cache-2_60-GHz)&lt;/a&gt;, it looks like you should be able to get SOL functionality from the I3-2120T (I know the 2120 should support it, not sure about the lower power "T" version however).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I have not tested this yet, but will look around the lab for this processor board combo and let you know what I find.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Josh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:16d6a957-87c6-4ea0-8c64-9015722f0c75] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/154138?tstart=0#154138</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-04-17T16:55:21Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 1 month ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different versions of AMT out there?  KVM not available in 'standard'?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/153920?tstart=0#153920</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:5f122802-2247-4d7a-8677-5e7edbbe3129] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi Josh,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;can you point out which is the cheapest processor I can use with Intel DQ67EP motherboard in order to get Serial-over-LAN? It is all I need from AMT, and lowest possible power of the processor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:5f122802-2247-4d7a-8677-5e7edbbe3129] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 04:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/153920?tstart=0#153920</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-04-15T04:05:29Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 1 month ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different versions of AMT out there?  KVM not available in 'standard'?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/152627?tstart=0#152627</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:7adf723d-54f0-4084-ae45-41443f2d2c68] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi ParmB,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are correct, KVM will only be supported on the full vPro enabled systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I took a look at the Lenovo site and the only thing that sticks out is in the detailed tech specs:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;here is the M91p for example:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.lenovo.com/products/us/desktop/thinkcentre/m-series/m91-m91p/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.lenovo.com/products/us/desktop/thinkcentre/m-series/m91-m91p/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;you will notice about 1/2 way down the page it shows "Best in Class Manageability" and highlights Intel vPro technology&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;on the M81 you see that it only refers to "Stability and Manageability" with no Intel vPro reference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.lenovo.com/products/us/desktop/thinkcentre/m-series/m81/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.lenovo.com/products/us/desktop/thinkcentre/m-series/m81/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree it could be a bit clearer, and we have created a matrix in the past to help guide users to the appropriate systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will follow up with the internal team and see if we can get this matrix updated:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="jive-link-wiki-small" data-containerId="2005" data-containerType="14" data-objectId="2033" data-objectType="102" href="http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-2033"&gt;http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-2033&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Josh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:7adf723d-54f0-4084-ae45-41443f2d2c68] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/152627?tstart=0#152627</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-03-29T20:51:07Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 1 month ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Different versions of AMT out there?  KVM not available in 'standard'?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/152405?tstart=0#152405</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:5514feed-1050-4772-87e0-4b4ebd482b86] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I was excited to try out the AMT capability on my new Lenovo M81 with an i5-2400 processor.&amp;nbsp; The desktop also has Intel HD graphics, so theoretically this would support the KVM availability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately in the BIOS settings for this machine, there is no KVM setting to be seen anywhere.&amp;nbsp; This is confirmed by exporting the .XML file by running the SCS utility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there a better version of AMT out there that can be purchased, or upgraded to?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or does this just sort of intermittently vary by manufacturer?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really sucks as this pretty important feature is not articulated upon by the OEMs with regards to specific models.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:5514feed-1050-4772-87e0-4b4ebd482b86] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>pboparai@wesbell.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/152405?tstart=0#152405</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-03-27T19:46:03Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 1 month ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>3</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

