<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Intel Communities: Message List</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/index.jspa?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:47:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Jive SBS 5.0.2.0  (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-11T03:47:03Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DX58SO &amp; Core i7 D0 stepping BIOS Connundrum</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/24917?tstart=0#24917</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:fb9b0a16-f6ac-4d51-9df2-eb28ab0d0ba4] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;FYI: The D0 revision chips should boot even with an older DX58SO BIOS.&amp;nbsp; I've done it.&amp;nbsp; So, you should at least be able to do a BIOS upgrade if you are paranoid and don't want to install the OS without an official "supported" BIOS.&amp;nbsp; Yes, I did that too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The same is true for other X58 boards I've used, like ASUS and EVGA.&amp;nbsp; So, "unsupported" stepping does not mean "doesn't work at all."&amp;nbsp; Of course, your mileage may vary.&amp;nbsp; If it isn't working for others, I don't know what to say...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:fb9b0a16-f6ac-4d51-9df2-eb28ab0d0ba4] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/24917?tstart=0#24917</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-11T03:32:25Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 11 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Xeon vs i7 Processors</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/21211?tstart=0#21211</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:74f9998b-8206-4f66-b916-dca9fda31c6c] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, you can use higher speed memory.&amp;nbsp; Of course, setting it to use over 1066 MHz (DDR3-800) is technically overlocking the W3540 memory controller.&amp;nbsp; I assume you actually mean 1600 Mhz (DDR3-12800) sticks, right?&amp;nbsp; That's generally a good choice for price/performance, and gives you a decent overclocking buffer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do note that chasing MHz for RAM is fairly pointless for real world performance with this excellent architecture.&amp;nbsp; It performs &lt;em&gt;exceptionally&lt;/em&gt; well at stock or near stock speeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:74f9998b-8206-4f66-b916-dca9fda31c6c] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:31:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/21211?tstart=0#21211</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T22:31:34Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 11 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Xeon vs i7 Processors</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/20826?tstart=0#20826</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:146d0a68-e175-4412-b885-c592d4c17d41] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are three products that are part of the Nehalem microarchitecture currently: Core i7, Xeon 3500 and Xeon 5500.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Core i7 = High-end Desktop Nehalem&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Xeon 3500 = Adds optional ECC memory support [Targeted for workstations]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Xeon 5500 = Adds support for 2 CPUs [Targeted for dual CPU servers &amp;amp; workstations]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the same MHz, all these CPUs will perform exactly the same.&amp;nbsp; If you want the fastest and most flexible (for overclocking) CPU for desktop use, select the forthcoming Core i7 975 "Extreme Edition" CPU or the Xeon 3570.&amp;nbsp; They will both work on the same exact motherboard, even though most won't bother advertising they accept the Xeon 3500 version.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:146d0a68-e175-4412-b885-c592d4c17d41] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/20826?tstart=0#20826</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-25T22:24:14Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 11 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

