<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Intel Communities: Message List</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/index.jspa?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Jive SBS 5.0.2.0  (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-28T22:33:14Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can we virtualize everything? Do you have "non-virtualize-able" applications?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/5943?tstart=0#5943</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:7196ee06-84d0-4f20-ad39-47664a300c0a] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;if you read the&amp;nbsp; blurb you can virtualise everything.&amp;nbsp; the reality is if you have two applications that want the same resource all of the time you are introducing a contention and you will see a problem.&amp;nbsp; It will work but not in the way you like.&amp;nbsp; So that said if you have an app that hits the disk hard all day every day I would say this is an un virtualisable app as more often than not your other apps would like some time with the disk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:7196ee06-84d0-4f20-ad39-47664a300c0a] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/5943?tstart=0#5943</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-09-28T22:33:14Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>4 years, 7 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

