<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Intel Communities: Message List</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/index.jspa?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Jive SBS 5.0.2.0  (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-23T11:25:04Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why are Windows 7 Users Running Toolbox Optimizer?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/78481?tstart=0#78481</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:a1073471-345a-4761-ad38-55aca37555a0] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since there were quite a few horror stories surrounding firmware 02HA and the corresponding Toolbox I made sure it didn't run more than once. (I never experienced any problems with 02HA though.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:a1073471-345a-4761-ad38-55aca37555a0] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/78481?tstart=0#78481</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T11:25:04Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 5 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why are Windows 7 Users Running Toolbox Optimizer?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/78467?tstart=0#78467</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:aa50a044-3472-4bcc-9f89-cf38b7a36fc6] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not much point in running the same tool as you do since the machine is a Lenovo T61 which has got it's SATA interface speed limited to 1,5 GB (even though it is a SATA 2 interface).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm using CrystalDiskMark to measure the disk performance (yeah I know it can't always be fully trusted) and the performance has stayed consistent ever since I installed firmware 02HA back in october 27. After installing 02HA I ran the optimizer once and that made a huge difference. I upgraded to firmware 02HD on december 2, no performance change. The second time ever I ran the optimizer was yesterday after installing ver 1.2 and that didn't change the performance at all either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:aa50a044-3472-4bcc-9f89-cf38b7a36fc6] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/78467?tstart=0#78467</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T10:16:24Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 5 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why are Windows 7 Users Running Toolbox Optimizer?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/78462?tstart=0#78462</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:e84635b1-3e85-4c7d-9537-d7b492a04256] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have ICH8M in my laptop and TRIM works like a charm for me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Win 7 64-bit, AHCI, MS drivers and 160GB X25-M) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:e84635b1-3e85-4c7d-9537-d7b492a04256] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/78462?tstart=0#78462</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T08:58:21Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 5 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>4</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Experiences from the new version (1.2) of Toolbox</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/78332?tstart=0#78332</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:84993702-5735-4cf2-8a38-571d94eef3ee] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I installed it without any problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Running the optimizer took 10 minutes on my 160GB drive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It didn't change the performance at all though (measured with CrystalDiskMark), on the other hand I didn't expect it to either since I'm using Windows 7 with TRIM enabled. You could say that it prooved that TRIM really works.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:84993702-5735-4cf2-8a38-571d94eef3ee] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:32:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/78332?tstart=0#78332</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-12-22T11:32:45Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 5 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>4</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: new firmware released 02HD - experiences so far?</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/75961?tstart=0#75961</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:826b061d-d7b5-4173-b9bd-f7d3e0e17b20] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I decided to take the plunge and upgraded, so far so good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am running Windows 7 x64.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:826b061d-d7b5-4173-b9bd-f7d3e0e17b20] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/75961?tstart=0#75961</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-12-01T21:52:57Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 5 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Update from Intel's NAND Solutions Group - Firmware issue</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/75926?tstart=0#75926</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:c9f00c1a-9cd1-45dd-9772-0ef51017a10c] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're probably right on that account, I just wanted to point out that SMART-data &lt;em&gt;CAN&lt;/em&gt; be manipulated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:c9f00c1a-9cd1-45dd-9772-0ef51017a10c] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:59:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/75926?tstart=0#75926</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-12-01T19:59:09Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 5 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Update from Intel's NAND Solutions Group - Firmware issue</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/74644?tstart=0#74644</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:396d6a72-66cc-45fe-8c63-dcd1fe4eee1d] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not quite true. There are products on the market that can manipulate just about anything on a drive, even S.M.A.R.T. data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check this out: &lt;a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.deepspar.com/pdf/DeepSparPC-3000UDMABrochure8.0.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.deepspar.com/pdf/DeepSparPC-3000UDMABrochure8.0.pdf&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:396d6a72-66cc-45fe-8c63-dcd1fe4eee1d] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/74644?tstart=0#74644</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-21T12:37:08Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel SSD in windows 2003 servers</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/74295?tstart=0#74295</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:44ac3e1f-0ddb-4d01-a12b-3d504e80d19c] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Windows 2003 R2 does not support TRIM, but Windows 2008 R2 does.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a server you really should use X25-E, the X25-M will burn out pretty quickly from the constant write cycles in a server. Unfortuneately the X25-E is considerably more expensive than the X25-M, but it's faster than the X25-M and will last for ten times the number of write cycles.A plus is that it doesn't suffer as much from speed degradation over time either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The X25-E doesn't support TRIM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:44ac3e1f-0ddb-4d01-a12b-3d504e80d19c] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/74295?tstart=0#74295</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-18T22:41:12Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Update from Intel's NAND Solutions Group - Toolbox issue</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/74044?tstart=0#74044</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:7c593408-76a4-469a-9258-59df855b5b53] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;TRIM actually seems to work on my 160GB drive. I have now been using the new firmware for exactly three weeks and the performance of my drive hasn't dropped at a all (measured with CrystalDiskMark 2.2), if anything it's slightly improved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit RTM has been on the drive for almost 2 months. I'm using Microsofts AHCI-drivers and the BIOS was set to AHCI when upgrading the firmware. It was the Windows 7 installation that took care of the initial partitioning of the drive and it added the 100MB "System Reserved" partition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The drive is even encrypted, using Bitlocker, and it was encrypted before upgrading the firmware.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I only ran Toolbox/Optimizer once, right after installing the new firmware. The Toolbox didn't schedule any future Optimizer sessions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I must admit that I have been a bit scared the past weeks since it's my work computer and I really need it to be functioning well. I have read everything I could lay my hands on regarding TRIM and it really seems to be tricky implementing. Check out the discussions regarding problems and bad performance on Crucial's and OCZ's sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All in all I'm a happy SSD user but Intel really could have done a better job COMMUNICATING with it's customers!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Message was edited by: RollerBoy&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; reason: typo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:7c593408-76a4-469a-9258-59df855b5b53] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:13:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/74044?tstart=0#74044</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-17T17:13:22Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hello Intel? Information please!</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/message/73498?tstart=0#73498</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:f66e7a66-c88c-41d6-8062-b0b62c782ed7] --&gt;&lt;div class="jive-rendered-content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is the situation that bad, that you (Intel) don't know anything?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:f66e7a66-c88c-41d6-8062-b0b62c782ed7] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/message/73498?tstart=0#73498</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-12T19:12:49Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 years, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:objectType>0</clearspace:objectType>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

