<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Intel® vPro™ Expert Center : Industry Study of 106 Enterprises: Using Total Cost of Ownership to Determine Optimal PC Refresh Lifecycles, and Intel PC Total Cost of Ownership Estimator (Includes Intel vPro technology analysis) : Comments</title>
    <link>http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-3144#comments</link>
    <description>Comments on : Industry Study of 106 Enterprises: Using Total Cost of Ownership to Determine Optimal PC Refresh Lifecycles, and Intel PC Total Cost of Ownership Estimator (Includes Intel vPro technology analysis)</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.9 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-05T18:43:46Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Industry Study of 106 Enterprises: Using Total Cost of Ownership to Determine Optimal PC Refresh Lifecycles, and Intel PC Total Cost of Ownership Estimator (Includes Intel vPro technology analysis)</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-3144#comments-4317</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:89c28b79-8d33-4d41-bf53-625250ff8fd5] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;There seems to be a typo within this docs on page 3 Figure 1 &amp;amp; 2. The 3 year refresh is listed twice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:89c28b79-8d33-4d41-bf53-625250ff8fd5] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>webadmin@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-3144#comments-4317</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-07-05T18:43:46Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>4 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Industry Study of 106 Enterprises: Using Total Cost of Ownership to Determine Optimal PC Refresh Lifecycles, and Intel PC Total Cost of Ownership Estimator (Includes Intel vPro technology analysis)</title>
      <link>http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-3144#comments-4320</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:3bc48d97-ff7f-4a77-9fca-98ebd7592ca3] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks - we fixed the typo and uploaded a new document.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:3bc48d97-ff7f-4a77-9fca-98ebd7592ca3] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>justin.van.buren@intel.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-3144#comments-4320</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-07-06T22:05:11Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>4 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

