Home > Intel Communities

Blog Posts

Blog Posts: 1,874
Items per page
Statistics: Blogs: 163 Blog Posts: 1,874   1 2 3 ... 63 Previous Next
1

La tecnología se ha transformado en los últimos tiempos en un elemento clave de la vida de todos, pero la misma existencia de posibilidades tecnológicas cada vez más promisorias genera una brecha entre los que pueden acceder a los avances y aquellos que  no tienen la posibilidad de llegar a esos nuevos productos o servicios. Considerando la educación se podría decir que aquellos que utilizan de manera amigable las nuevas tecnologías para educarse en la actualidad, tienen más posibilidades a futuro.Lo que se torna fundamental es entonces la alfabetización digital de los jóvenes, porque hoy los nuevos excluidos son los analfabetos digitales.

Ante esta problemática Intel ha llevado adelante iniciativas para lograr un achicamiento progresito de la brecha digital. Una de las ideas fuertes de los últimos tiempos en torno a la educación fue el llamado modelo 1 a 1, que cobró notoriedad a partir del proyecto OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) que proponía la fabricación de laptops baratas para los niños de los países emergentes. Coincidiendo con los planteos de la iniciativa OLPC,  Intel desarrolló su propia laptop escolar de bajo costo, la classmate PC . Un equipo altamente durable, pequeño y con conexión a Internet, y se unió al proyecto con el fin de trabajar conjuntamente con la organización para explorar formas de colaborar relativas a la tecnología y el contenido educativo, haciendo de la sinergia una forma de llegar a todos los niños del mundo y seguir renovando el compromiso con la educación.

Los Classmate fueron diseñados específicamente por Intel para responder a las necesidades de las aulas en mercados emergentes. El PC asequible y totalmente funcional soporta entornos de aprendizaje colaborativo para escuelas y ya ha empezado a entregarse en volumen a mercados emergentes. La visión de Intel es conectar a las personas con un universo de oportunidades, impulsando la adopción de la tecnología en la educación. Las netbooks classmate PC  basadas en tecnología Intel son muy económicas y se han diseñado para satisfacer las necesidades educativas de los alumnos, pero teniendo en cuenta los factores etnográficos y humanos en aulas reales con el fin de generar soluciones específicas y eficaces en esos ámbitos, para que aumente la micromovilidad de los estudiantes que pueden experimentar con su laptop sentados en el piso, solos, en su pupitre o en grupos.

La classmate PC basadas en tecnología Intel están mejorando la enseñanza de más un millón de algunos en 50 países,  pero no solo las escuelas sino también las comunidades aprovechan la classmate para generar soluciones innovadoras ante problemas ambientales, agrícolas y de salud.

 

 

En Nigeria los chicos descubrieron un mundo nuevo a partir del software de sus classmates y de la posibilidad de interactuar con personas de todo el mundo. La adquisición dinamizó el aula y estimuló el aprendizaje. En Campinas- Brasil, una maestra logró sacarle el máximo provecho a las nuevas classmate al utilizar una aplicación informática en una clase de portugués que permitió a los alumnos crear animaciones y compartirlas con el resto de sus compañeros a través del SmartBoard de la laptop. En un momento determinado se presentaron dificultades técnicas y uno de los alumnos pudo solucionarlas, de esta manera se abrió en el aula un cauce de conocimiento más horizontal diferente al que estamos habituados.


 

Links


Intel


Learning Series


 

                Digg    Newsvine

1 Comments Permalink

Test Blog Post - IE8 - Modified.

0 Comments Permalink

For the past four years the Field Image Kit has been the primary tool the Intel Field Sales team and partner organizations have used to demonstrate Intel® vPro™ platform features to customers.  The Field Image Kit includes the full infrastructure and software required to demonstrate Intel® vPro™ technology across various top tier Intel® vPro™ solution providers.  This includes Microsoft, Symantec, and LANDesk.

 

Field sales teams are able to load the Field Image Kit on two lightweight notebook computers and showcase various Intel® vPro™ technology use case demonstrations.  How is this possible?  By utilizing virtual machines aided by Intel® Virtualization Technology, we are able to run an infrastructure Virtual Machine which handles all of the back end requirements for Intel® vPro™ to function in a large enterprise.  This includes DHCP, DNS, Active Directory, and Certificate Authority.  The user can then run another Virtual Machine with the software vendor management console of their choice.  With the intuitive documentation, even those with limited to no Intel® vPro™ experience can perform management operations.

 

Our latest feat, Field Image Kit 5.0, releases Monday, November 30, 2009.  The 5.0 release includes:

  • Updated infrastructure VM running Windows Server 2008
  • Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2007 (SCCM) SP2
  • Symantec Altiris Client Management Suite 7.0
  • LANDesk Real Time System Manager 8.8 SP3
  • Updated documentation including videos for various use case demonstrations and configuration.
  • Windows 7 upgrade kit enabling the update of Management Consoles and Clients to Windows 7

 

The following demonstrations are available in the Field Image Kit:

 

Windows 7 Deployment Demonstration
Many companies are looking for a secure and reliable method to deploy Windows 7 to their clients.  Field Image Kit 5.0 now enables users to demonstrate deployment of Windows 7 to the clients in their enterprise.  With the pre-created task sequence, simply advertise the deployment task to a collection of Intel® vPro™ clients and deployment will begin regardless of current power state.

 

Fast Call for Help – Client Initiated Remote Access Demonstration
Field Image Kit 5.0 now supports Fast Call for Help showcasing initiating a connection to the enterprise for vPro management from the internet cloud.  *Note:  An external network adapter is required in addition to the internal adapter in the management console.

 

Customizable Network Filter Demonstration
Demonstrate Symantec’s unique ability to customize system defense filters while isolating the system. Using the standard system defense policy the system cannot communicate on the network with the exception of a secure connection to the management console. With customizable filters, the user can remotely remediate the client by allowing traffic to tools such as Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection.

 

XP Mode Demonstration
Field Image Kit 5.0 demonstrates the new XP Mode feature in Windows 7.  Many older custom applications do not natively run in Windows 7.  XP Mode integrates a built-in virtual machine utilizing Intel® Virtualization Technology running Windows XP with the custom applications.  The applications are executed directly from the start menu in Windows 7 and run alongside applications running in the host OS to ensure a seamless user interface.

Video Demonstrations
New videos are included in Field Image Kit 5.0 to aid in configuration as well as to expedite showcasing lengthy demonstrations such as the Windows 7 deployment demo.

Intel® vPro™ Technology Information Kiosk
Field Image Kit 5.0 marks the introduction of the Intel® vPro™ Technology Information Kiosk.  Kiosk is designed to showcase Intel® vPro™ technology demonstrations and collateral in an easy to use web interface.

 

‘Drop In’ Use Case Reference Designs
Now introducing ‘Drop In’ Use Case Reference Designs assisting end users in activating Intel® vPro™ features in their enterprise or small/medium business.

 

Field Image Kit 5.0 releases Monday November 30.  Visit the Intel® Demo Kit portal for more information.

0 Comments Permalink
0

It is not late to register for a joint webinar delivered by Red Hat, Intel, and Dell.

This webinar delivers how to plan and execute your migration from SPARC/Solaris to Dell/Intel/Red Hat, a popular content also delivered in seminars the companies did in North America in October.

  • A clear roadmap showing the estimated timeframe and costs for your migration
  • Effective training for you and your IT staff
  • Proven best practices to ensure a smooth implementation
  • Join Red Hat, Intel, and Dell on December 2 2009 at 2pm ET to see how these open source pioneers can help you move from a RISC/UNIX environment to Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

 

Register here.

0 Comments Permalink
0

After posting the video and opinion paper It is Time for a Data Security Revolution! a reader posed a simple yet deep question.  GroogFish, in the YouTube video comments asked ...who is supposed to start this "revolution"?  As my response is a bit lengthy for the comments section of YouTube, I am posting here.

 

I believe everyone has a role to play and a responsibility to support steps for securing data.  It is, after all, OUR information.  To succeed, a data security revolution must be a community effort resulting in the development of an entire ecosystem, with standards, communication, and an open architecture.

 

Consumer demands bring attention to the problem and ultimately will drive features.  Regulatory bodies, dare I submit, can enact requirements which mandate changes to technology capabilities.  Hardware and firmware vendors are important in order to support new architectures.  Data management and processing organizations must be on-board to insure interfaces and storage formats of data are compatible.  Operating system and application writers are key players to utilize and enforce such controls at the host system and repository levels.  They develop the products which engage the user.

 

The information security communities are the expert advocates.  They must analyze the situation, stimulate conversations, guide changes, and engage in value assessment discussions to become the sharpened spearhead which leads the charge forward.  Traditional and social news media should also contribute to overall education and public awareness.  They must go beyond just reporting the breaches, failures, and losses.  We are at risk of becoming numb at all the stories, without a meaningful reference point or perspectives of significance which show how the situation can change.  The public must be better informed to the root problem, the industry opportunities, and the dark truth of where apathy will lead.

 

I would like to see a consortium formed with major players and international standards bodies to establish a framework for development.  Government, privacy, commercial, academia, technology, and security representatives should be represented at the very least.  Critical mass with the aforementioned groups must be established before enough traction motivates a commitment on behalf of lead players to allocate initial resources.  Alternatively, assertive academic bodies could work together and take a first step by developing recommended standards, architectures, and proof-of-concept systems.

 

Although some pieces to the puzzle are out there, we don’t even know what the picture is supposed to look like and no guarantees the available parts will or should be brought together.  Boldly, I believe we must enforce a tabula rasa to nurture a fresh start, otherwise risk poisoning from our natural presumptions of what we believe we know.  It may not be the most popular sentiment, but adopting refined solutions and attempting to bolt them together is a mistake.  Instead, we take the learned and proven principles of those solutions and integrate them at a strategic level to eventually lead us to workable end solutions.

 

Opinion paper: It is Time for a Data Security Revolution!

0 Comments Permalink

     Words mean things.  And sometimes multiple words mean the same thing.  In our land we use NVM, EEPROM and Flash interchangeably at times.  This can be confusing, so this posting is a primer on the what, the why and the how of the storage on the adapters.

     First let’s break up the acronym soup.  NVM is Non-Volatile Memory.  It is memory that can survive power being gone for a long time.  EEPROM is electrically erasable programmable Read Only Memory.  Flash is based off the Fowler–Nordheim tunneling effect.  In "ye olde" days, an EEPROM and a Flash were very different inside and out.  Now days only the size seems to make a difference.  Both use the same HW principle.  EEPROMs can be erased and written one word at a time.  Flash are erased in sector or whole chip erase, and can be written one word at a time.

     A quick aside on erasing:  Flash have an unusual feature.  You can change a 1 bit to a 0 bit with a write command, but you can only change a 0 to 1 via erasing the word/image.  This makes a big difference since having to erase then write can add to the programming time.  EEPROM parts can write 0 to 1 via a single write command.  The software does not need to execute an erase command before writing an EEPROM word.  One reason the largest Flash parts are bigger than the largest EEPROM parts is that there is an extra transistor on each bit cell, allowing each bit to be changed in either direction.  Flash parts share this transistor and therefore must be erased in sector blocks.  It’s a little backwards to most people that "blank" is all 1s, but that's the way the electricals works.  Back to our show!

     As you probably see, an EEPROM is a NVM as is a Flash.  So why use the less precision term NVM over EEPROM?  Again history points the way.  Back before the rise of Wired for Management spec and its inclusion into WHQL (Windows* Hardware Qualification Labs) certifications, Flash was rarely included on an implementation.  But the silicon would need a storage site for things like MAC address, Wake on LAN settings and other things. This required us to put storage on the card.  We elected to use EEPROMs.  Small, simple and cheap and able to hold enough data for our needs, it was a perfect match.  Then as the need for pre-boot technologies (like PXE, which is a whole 'nother post) started to rise, WFM put the requirement that every card brought its option ROM with it.  At the time the only a Flash was big enough so that led to the dual approach, requiring both Flash and EEPROM.  Flash forward (pardon the pun) a decade and EEPROMs are almost the same size as the Flash of the earlier period.  At this point our team elected to use just one part, but segment it virtually to have a part that functions in the role of the EEPROM and part functions as the Flash.  Now we had products that you could use either a Flash or an EEPROM in this role and this is when we started calling either NVM.  And since terms seem to leak backwards, some people use it apply to EEPROM and Flash as separate items.  We have products that use a Flash in the role of the EEPROM and they call it NVM as well.  When somebody says NVM, just think storage of configuration data and option ROMs.  Be sure to check the datasheet and other documentation to make sure which storage family, EEPROM or Flash, is appropriate for your design.  Then you can call it NVM.

 

That was a bunch of stuff at once, so let’s end it on a review:

1)  NVM is EEPROM and/or Flash

2)  NVM/EEPROM/Flash will have device configuration information in it and is required for normal operation

3)  Thanks for using Intel(R) Ethernet products.

0 Comments Permalink
0

Esta semana pasó algo que me dio tanta confianza que creo que debería dejar de escribir, tal vez esta sea la última anécdota que vierta en palabras. Fue el viernes, ya durante la madrugada el cielo dio unos alaridos desesperados, las nubes explotaron en cascadas durante toda la mañana. Los ruidos de la tormenta me tranquilizaban, era como sentir el carácter de la naturaleza. La mala noticia llegó cuando Martín se levantó con un llamado telefónico, un compañero debía entrevistar a alguien en otro país pero justo su esposa dio a luz a su primer hijo, por lo que no podría realizar el viaje.

 

Martín se vistió rápidamente y me puso en el bolso, creo que él no había escuchado la ruidosa tormenta de la noche, porque no tomó un paraguas. Eso no importó, consiguió un taxi y llegamos al aeropuerto. El problema comenzó allí, ya que la tormenta había obligado a cancelar los vuelos. Martín estaba desesperado, la entrevista era en unas horas y no podría realizarla, y el cielo no tenía muchas intensiones de teñirse de azul. Luego de esperar un rato en el aeropuerto, realizar llamadas a sus jefes, a su familia, desganado fue hacia su casa creyendo que había perdido esa oportunidad de entrevistar a ese importante personaje.

Por la tarde mientras miraba cómo las agujas del reloj corrían irremediablemente hacia un dead line que no cumpliría, miró mi web cam, casi escondida en la parte superior del monitor, sus ojos brillaron por un momento, y una mueca de satisfacción apareció en su rostro. Tomó el teléfono y se comunicó con su jefe, le planteo su idea, pero creo que este no estaba muy convencido porque Martín tuvo que asegurarle que podría entrevistar perfectamente a esa personalidad, utilizándome como vehículo.

Finalmente logró su cometido y se comunicó a la hora pactada, pero por medio de Internet, con aquel que debía entrevistar. Aunque estaban separados por más de mil km, eso no importó. Mi cámara, el micrófono, la misma conexión, todo funcionó de maravilla, ambos estuvieran juntos charlando, frente a frente aunque en remoto.

Me sentí por fin necesitada, totalmente necesitada. Fue por la noche cuando comencé a leer las páginas de este diario, recordé uno a uno los hechos que había contado. Desde la llegada, feliz pero también melancólica, con los nuevos rostros, la nueva casa, el dueño desconocido hasta el último viaje frustrado por la tormenta. Encontré un gran cambio en mí, la inseguridad ya no me persigue, soy feliz, tal vez porque poco a poco he ido superando todos mis miedos y hoy me siento completamente segura frente a lo que pueda presentarse Por eso me despido y rememorando a un poeta digo, “estos serán los últimos versos que yo le escribo”.

 

 

Links


Intel.


 

                Digg    Newsvine

0 Comments Permalink


We have recently released the animation-light mode of the IT Manager III: Unseen Forces for the improved performance, check it out here http://itmanager3.intel.com/en-gb/default.aspx?iid=ENGSHORT+unseenforces&. You will need to select the animation mode from the options menu once you log in the game.


We are planning quite a few updates to the game in 2010 so stay tuned!


And what I mean by award winning? Check this out http://www.bima.co.uk/bima-award/030F131702/bima-awards-2009/awards-winners/


Will keep you posted with all the news about the game.


Keti

0 Comments Permalink
0

   Cloud computing buzz is on the raise. Cost reduction is one of the perceived benefits  of this capability. But is it really that cheap?

Yes, it's a great solution for small companies with Web-based operations, which don't have to plan for peak demand now - see "Animoto's Facebook scale-up" as an example.

   We've looked into applicability of such Infrastructure-as-a-Service solution for Intel Silicon design environment, and I may blog in the future on some of the findings from this study.

   At Intel, we utilize internal distributed grid of over 60,000 compute servers to run various jobs at over 80% utilization. The idea was to consider an external IaaS capacity as an extension to accommodate possible peak demands.

   We've built a proof-of-concept environment using one of the major IaaS clouds. The applications we are interested in are mostly single-threaded, and are CPU bounded. We found that per-core performance of the external cloud instances is significantly lower compared to our internal compute servers. As a result, we'd need 3x-4x more instances in the cloud as opposed to the internal deployment to achieve the same throughput. The TCO for such use (calculated based on July'2009 pricing) would be significantly higher in the cloud, this is one of the reasons for us stepping back at this point in time.

   I'll talk more about this study on the Cloud Computing Summit in Israel next week.

 

Cloud vendors - bring the performance up and the cost down, and we may come back!

 

 

Are you already leveraging external cloud capabilities to complement your computing infrastructure? What is your experience?

 

Till the next post,

    Gregory Touretsky

0 Comments Permalink

Deze blog post is een vervolg op een eerdere blog post die verder ingaat op Intel Virtualisatie Technology (VT). Het eerste deel is hier terug te vinden.

VT-d Virtualisation technology for directed I/O

Een direct gevolg van virtualisatie is dat het I/O verkeer binnen het systeem, maar ook (naar) buiten het systeem, toeneemt.  Er zijn immers meerdere guest o/s’en actief op het system die elk data verwerken, versturen en ontvangen.  De VMM wordt bij al deze I/O transacties betrokken, wat een extra belasting creëert voor de processor en waardoor het dataverkeer vertraagt. Er is dus sprake van overhead. VT-d adresseert dit probleem door de VMM in staat te stellen I/O kaarten toe te wijzen aan een individueel guest o/s.  Een I/O apparaat of kaart wordt een gedeelte van het geheugen toegewezen waar alleen het toegewezen guest o/s ook direct toegang tot krijgt. De VMM blijft nog steeds betrokken bij de transacties maar in (veel) mindere mate.

 

VMDq en VMDc vallen onder de VT-C paraplu benaming. VT-C bevat alle VT technologieen die betrekking hebben op netwerk verbindingen (connectivity)

 

Virtual Machine Device Queues (VMDq)

Het afhandelen van netwerkverkeer is een taak waar de VMM ook de regie op zich neemt. Alle pakketen die verzonden worden of in een guest o/s ontvangen, moeten door de VMM gesorteerd worden en ook weer van of naar het desbetreffende guest o/s of netwerkadapter gerouteerd worden. Dit is wederom een proces dat een belasting creëert voor de processor. Door middel van VMDq kan het sorteren plaats vinden op de Intel netwerkadapter in plaats dat de VMM de processor ermee belast. De VMM hoeft met behulp van VMDq alleen de routering van de pakketten nog af te handelen. Dit resulteert in een sneller afhandeling van het netwerkverkeer wat zich vertaalt in een lagere latency.

Virtual Machine Direct Connect (VMDc)

Door middel van VMDc wordt het mogelijk om een fysieke netwerkadapter onder te verdelen in meerdere virtuele adapters voor verschillende gues o/s’en. Een praktisch voorbeeld: er zijn 10 guest o/s’en actief op een server die elk een 1 Gb/s verbinding krijgen toegewezen op een fysieke 10 gb/s netwerkadapter. VMDc maakt gebruik van meerdere technologieën om dit voor elkaar te krijgen. VT-d wordt gebruikt om een netwerkpoort op de netwerkadapter toe te wijzen aan een specifiek guest o/s. Met behulp van Single Root I/O virtualisatie (SR-IOV) worden de fysieke poorten virtueel beschikbaar gemaakt voor meerdere guest o/s’en (dit wordt ook wel een Virtual Function (VF) genoemd). Omdat VT-d gebruikt wordt voor de directe adressering van guest o/s’en en de I/O hardware, wordt de VMM en dus ook de processor minder belast en de netwerk bandbreedte efficiënter gebruikt. Anders vertaald kan je dus stellen dat door middel van VMDc de consolidatie- ratio van guest o/s’en op een server verder omhoog gedreven wordt.

Ik hoopt dat de voordelen van Intel virtualisatie-technologie na het lezen van deze post wat inzichtelijker zijn geworden. VT is zoals gezegd eigenlijk een paraplubenaming voor een aantal specifieke technologieën die zijn ondergebracht in onze platformen.  In de toekomst zullen bovenstaande zaken zeker aangevuld worden met nieuwe technologieën en mogelijkheden waar ik dan zekere weer een post aan zal wijden.

Onderstaand nog wat links naar webpagina's waar meer informatie over dit onderwerp te vinden is:

http://www.intel.com/technology/virtualization/server/

http://www.intel.com/technology/virtualization/resources.htm?iid=tech_vt_server%20down_rsrc

 

En als afsluiting een filmpje waarin de geschiedenis en een aantal basis zaken aan het worden uitgelicht.

0 Comments Permalink
0

Having worked with Intel Active Management Technology and Intel vPro Technology since version 1.0, it seems to me that there are a whole host of possibilities for those who are do-it-yourself-ers. One is the ability to programmatically wake a system, remotely trigger a process such as a software patch, and then put the system back to sleep. As it turns out, this is not so hard, even for me who has a limited scripting (read batch file) capability. The video chronicles the results of my effort.

Disclaimer: this is not meant as a how-to or best method. Rather, it is an exploration of what’s possible, meant to educate and stimulate conversation. With that out of the way, let’s get to the fun stuff.

To accomplish this goal I knew I'd need some help via command line tools. I did an Internet search and found these 4 freely downloadable tools that made it all possible. They are;

Remote Control Util - to determine the current power state and turn the system on.

PsService - to start a process remotely

PsShutdown - to put the system back to sleep

sleep.exe - so the batch file can sleep while an event takes place.

The setup is simple; 2 systems. One is the console that executes the batch file and these commands. The other is my vPro system. I setup and configured my it using this Use Case Reference design (another of my batch file creations). That is to say, there's no TLS and I'm using only the admin account. I then ran the batch file on the console system which triggered the whole process. The process is as follows:

1.     Remote control util gets vPro's original power state via AMT (on, sleep, hibernate, or off)

2.     Remote control util power's on vPro via AMT

3.     Remote control util get's vPro's new power state to verify it has turned on

4.     ping vpro and check the TTL. Once it changes to <=128 the OS has booted. For more info

5.     PsService starts a process on vPro. I used notepad but it could be anything, including triggering a download and run of software patch

6.     PsService exits when the process finishes

7.     PsShutdown gracefully places vPro back to it's original sleep state

8.     Remote control util get's vPro's new power state to verify it has returned to it's original power state

Couple of notes.

·         I set an auto login on my vPro so I could see the process. However, PsService will work without a user being logged in. Also, it can run processes in the back ground so an end user would not be able to interact.

·         I used Notepad as my remote process since it made it easy to see success. However, any process can be started. In fact, PsService supports downloading the executable to run. As such, it may be possible to download and then run a patch or batch file as part of this whole process

·         I used a single vPro system. But, with a simple loop the same core batch file could trigger this action on many vPro systems.

Hope you found this post enjoyable and thought provoking. If you have your own do-it-yourself vPro ideas, or want to recreate this one, please share. And, hey, who says batch files are dead?

0 Comments Permalink
0

Hola! Tenemos un montón de fotos del encuentro que organizamos en Buenos Aires, en una isla de Tigre, donde pudimos pasar un día excelente y compartir un análisis de lo que hicimos hasta ahora, y lo que pensamos hacer en los próximos meses. Para no extenderme en este post (lo dejo para alguno posterior) les muestro esta galería de fotos para que compartan, comenten, se reconozcan, vuelvan a disfrutar y alimenten la ansiedad, pensando que aunque todavía falte, el próximo Intel Press Summit, va a estar buenísimo.

 

 

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
0

It’s understandable that in today’s economy that you might consider pushing out your PC refresh cycle to save cash today.  This is an area of cost cutting that many companies consider so you’re not alone.  But if you have considered, or are considering, pushing out your PC refresh cycle, have you factored in all of the costs that impact that decision?  These costs include the unexpected costs of supporting older machines once the warranty has expired, higher energy costs compared to new machines, and more.    The total cost of ownership starts to increase out in time and will eventually reach a point where it makes more sense to replace your PCs versus continuing to maintain them.  But how do you know what the optimal replacement time is?  And is delaying your refresh really the best financial decision?

There are strong financial reasons to refresh PCs now and, with the Windows 7 operating system, there are even stronger reasons to do so with PCs powered by Intel® Core™ 2 processors with vPro™ technology.   Join me for a webcast on Tuesday, December 1st, where I’ll walk  through our analysis on the PC refresh cycle and the framework we use, discuss the true cost of older PCs and how to assess your own PC refresh cycle, and share our experience with Windows 7 as part of the Technical Adopter Program (TAP).  I’ll also be joined by Amy Stephan from Microsoft who will provide more insight into why it makes sense to refresh now and why Windows* 7 and New PCs with Intel® vPro™ Technology are better together.

Register now at:  http://webcasts.techrepublic.com.com/abstract.aspx?docid=1177231&tag=content;rightCol

0 Comments Permalink
0

Nehalem-EX: Big Memory for Big Science

I was at SuperComputing’09 last week in Portland, Oregon. I talked with some brilliant people, and saw some fantastic stuff.

It was good timing on my part because last week Intel also announced that it would offer a 6-core, frequency-optimized version of its Nehalem-EX product due out next year. This part is intended for use in tackling some of the types of high performance computing (HPC) workloads prominently displayed at SC’09.

Most people know that the majority of HPC workloads today are based on clusters of relatively small-memory, 2-socket systems. That is because most HPC workloads may be broken into smaller, discrete units of work that can be efficiently processed using such clusters. For these workloads the primary hardware capability selection criterion is typically a balance of both memory bandwidth and compute FLOPs (floating point operations per second).

But there are other types of HPC workloads. Specifically, those that deal with very large datasets (some as large as a terabyte) or those that have to deal with non-sequential memory access. This means the workloads simply aren’t easily divisible--or it is inefficient to do so-- into the relatively small memory footprints used in traditional clustered 2-socket HPC solutions. Examples of these types of bigger memory applications can be found in a variety of fields such as weather prediction, manufacturing structure analysis, and financial services.

The high-speed processing requirements and size of these workloads put a greater premium on system memory capacity/bandwidth than on compute FLOPs.

If the larger dataset won’t fit into available memory, and dividing up the dataset to spread across multiple nodes cannot easily be done, then data has to be moved in and out memory to hard disk.  But using hard disk drives (which are many times slower than RAM memory) can drastically impair performance.

There are now two better alternatives to the use of hard drivers. One is SSDs and the other is having a larger memory footprint. Solid State Drives have fairly high data density vs RAM, but much faster access than hard-disk drives--albeit still markedly slower than RAM. Another solution is to simply have more capacity of the faster RAM. This last one is what the Nehalem-EX HPC part is aimed at.

Nehalem-EX is the Expandable Class of Nehalem. The Expandable Class brings all the goodness of the Nehalem architecture (Xeon 5500 product line) to the HPC market, but in the form of a “super node” that has greater: a) core/thread count, b) socket scaling (up to 256), c) I/O and memory capacity (up to 1 terabyte in a 4 socket system) and bandwidth at capacity, d) reliability features, e) and other features.

The 6-core frequency-optimized Nehalem-EX part has also been tuned to offer the highest core frequency possible for this chip.   In creating this part, Intel is meeting the needs of the HPC community that want higher scalar performance along with the benefit of large memory capacity and bandwidth per core.

Of course the 8-core version of NHM-EX is still an option for those HPC workloads that scale well with more cores while still looking for the high memory capacity of the expandable class.

By having both 8-core and frequency optimized 6-core versions of the NHM-EX class of processors means HPC researchers have greater choice in selecting the processor best suited for their specific workloads.

After talking with some of the researchers at SC’09 last week I’m really excited to see how the Nehalem-EX “super node” will deliver the necessary compute and memory capabilities to help those researchers solve some of their biggest challenges.

0 Comments Permalink
0

Change is hard, but it can be done and the benefits of change usually outweigh the concerns which were on our minds before we made the change.

 

When making the change from running your solution on a RISC architecture to running that solution on a Xeon architecture, the biggest concern usually relates to whether that solution will run at the same level as on the previous architecture. I'm not talking about performance specifically, but usually the question is around whether operating systems like Linux, Windows, and Solaris on Xeon will meet your business needs for yourmission critical solutions.

 

Like the underlying improvements in the microprocessor, I believe that there have also been major fundamental improvements in the operating systems that run on both today's and the soon to come next generation microprocessors (sorry, my obligatory Nehalem-EX advertisement... coming soon in 2010). A decision made many years ago to run your solution on Unix/RISC was made based on comparing all the different variables at that time to pick what was right for your business. At that time you likely decided that your solution would not run on these operating systems, these operating systems were not suitable for your mission critical workloads etc. Probably right decision at that point, but like everything else decisions get revisited based upon the here and now and what may have been the right solution in the past (and right decision) may not be the right solution for your needs now.

 

I wanted to share some thoughts specifically on Redhat Linux today. Lets take a little look at Redhat Enterprise Linux. Current versions of Redhat can deliver what is required for your critical solutions. RHEL is ready and here are some of the reasons cited by Redhat in recent webinars on this topic and my interpretation of their comments

  • Hosts real-time global mission-critical infrastructures and operations 24 X 7 - its tried and tested by other Enterprises
  • Enables 5x9s availability in highly secure environments - pretty important to most critical solutions
  • Contributes measurable reductions to TCO and enables, agile, standardized, and virtualized infrastructures - TCO benefits through standardization
  • Has major ISVs on-board with the majority of 3rd party Unix applications have Linux and/or Windows versions available - the ISVs that traditionally delivered applications to you based on Unix, also have versions supported on Linux/Windows
  • Many customer unique applications are developed with programming languages such as C, C++, JAVA, or J2EE and can be migrated to Linux and / or Windows - your applications can be moved
  • Hosts most major database systems standard for your infrastructure - all the major databases run and run well on Linux

One of the other things we encounter a lot is around whether the technical considerations to move from one operating system environment are too high to overcome and outweigh the benefits of moving. There are always technical considerations and things that you need to know to move from one environment to another. However you are not alone in trying to understand these technical considerations. Redhat have done a phenomenal job of documenting the challenges of moving from say Solaris to Linux and have developed a great Strategic Migration Planning Guide. This is available on request. In recent webinars Redhat outline some of the things that you need to consider for the following technical categories

- Development Environment; Kernel tuning; Security; Filesystems; Debugging, tracing, Profiling; Command Differences; Deployment methods; Software Management; Virtualization; Application considerations 

In addition to the current versions of Redhat running on Intel architecture, we are also working very closely on future versions that will take advantage of the 20+ new RAS features that are planned for Nehalem-EX - more on that in a future blog

You are not alone, resources, tools and expertize exist to help you make that move and reap the business benefits while still delivering to the requirements of your business. Check out Redhat online tools for more information that dives deeper into all the areas for consideration http://www.redhat.com/migrate/solaris_to_linux/

We think Redhat Linux and Xeon are ready to run your mission critical workloads and solutions...What do you think?

0 Comments Permalink
0

On mmy SCCM Site server, I was looking througurah my AMTOPMGR.log and I noticed the following entry:

 

Error: The provisioning certificate with the thumbprint 55B7AF313A725CA10BB47A382494A3BD2927D1FB will expire in 1 day(s). Please ensure that this certificate is renewed. (CertID = 1)

 

In looking at my Provisioning Certificate loaded on my SCCM SP2 site server, I did find out the expiration date was about to hit.

 

Untitled.gif

 

So I will let this cert expire so I can report out what happens to an environment that has their provisioning certificate expire.  I will add more of these learnings after this expiration date hits.  More to come....and then type for me to re-purchase this cert so my lab continues to provision.

0 Comments Permalink
0

El Desafío Intel América Latina, la competencia regional tecnológica, asociada a las universidades premió a los mejores talentos de la región con el objeto de potenciar así sus planes de negocio. Hace unas semanas conocimos a los ganadores: por Argentina Wormhole  y mención honorífica para Keepcon. En Chile Voxound obtuvo el primer premio y Sugaut una mención de honor. Mientras que por Colombia los mejores fueron Filsel  (primer lugar) y Pulse (mención), en Costa Rica los aplausos fueron para GoldRoot y MasterMed (mencionado). Finalmente por México el elegido fue  Inviko y la mención para Smart Tec.

Felicitaciones a todos los elegidos que luego debieron competir desarrollando y defendiendo sus planes de negocios de manera virtual. Los 3 proyectos ganadores  recibieron un premio en dinero: US$25.000 el primer lugar, US$15.000 el segundo y el tercer Premio US$10.000. Además  tuvieron la posibilidad participar en el Intel Berkeley Technology Entrepreneurship Challenge (IBTEC), uno de los concursos internacionales más reconocidos en el campo de los negocios y la tecnología en el Berkeley, California del 17 al 19 de noviembre en Silicon Valley, con el costo de viaje cubierto para dos personas por cada proyecto premiado. IBTEC es la competencia global de planes de negocios tecnológicos en donde confluyen algunos de los mejores proyectos y emprendedores del mundo.

 

Finalmente el ganador fue Wormhole IT de Argentina, mientras que el segundo lugar fue para Voxound (Chile)  y el tercer premio fue compartido entre Inviko (México) y Filsel (Colombia).

 

Los dejamos con una entrevista a Sally  Buberman co- fundadora y  Directora del área de comunicación y recursos humanos de Wormhole IT – WIT.

 

  • ¿Cómo decidieron participar en el Desafío Intel? El incentivo más fuerte para participar vino de la mano de la posibilidad de llegar a Berkeley a exponer el proyecto. Para nosotros es un sueño cumplido haber llegado al Sillicon Valley y encima tener una oportunidad  (única en la vida) de exponer en la Universidad de California. Tener un sueño tan grande al final del camino nos mantuvo motivados y no nos dejó bajar los brazos. Nos preparamos con mucha dedicación y entusiasmo. Trabajamos sábados, domingos y feriados. Nos repartimos las tareas y una vez al día hacíamos un checkpoint para verificar el avance de cada uno y trabajar sobre las dudas que pudieran ir surgiendo. Nos juntábamos periódicamente con nuestro mentor y nuestros asesores y entrevistamos varias personas para sondear oportunidades.
  • ¿Cuáles son los beneficios obtenidos por haber ganado el premio?
      • Los beneficios por haber ganado el premio son realmente ilimitados:
        • Obtuvimos la posibilidad de llegar a la final Mundial del IBTEC y presentar nuestra empresa a los venture capitals más importantes del mundo.
         
        • Nos permitió conocer gente de todo el mundo y establecer redes de contacto.
        • Nos capacitó y brindó soporte de mentores prestigiosos de Argentina y Estados Unidos.
        • Nos brindó prensa, que para un Start-up es de vital importancia para darse a conocer. 
        • Nos ayudó a cerrar nuevos contratos. 
        • Nos trajo nuevos clientes.
         

       

    1. ¿Creen que su participación en el Intel+UC Berkeley Technology Entrepreneurship Challenge es una buena forma expandir su plan de negocios? Nuestro plan de negocios se basó en la expansión Latinoamericana de nuestros productos. En la actualidad comercializamos productos de videoconferencia 100% web a través de una red de socios de Negocios que se ven beneficiados con la venta de nuestros productos. Mayoritariamente, estos socios son empresas de Telecomunicaciones y Proveedores de Internet. Contamos con Iplan como socio de Negocio en Argentina y estamos trabajando también con otra compañía en el Ecuador. Nuestra participación en el IBTEC es de gran importancia para la Compañía y nos está ayudando a expandir nuestro plan de negocios y nuestra red de contactos. Lo más importante para mejorar y refinar el trabajo y el modelo comercial es tener la posibilidad de recibir feedback de expertos de industria y venture capitals que ven proyectos todos los días. Esto hace que puedas analizar desde otras perspectivas y realidades tu plan de trabajo y optimizarlo para obtener los mejores resultados con el menor costo.
    2. Muchas gracias a todos los que fueron parte del concurso.¡Hasta el próximo Desafío Intel!

      Links


      Intel.


       

                      Digg    Newsvine

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      I've been asking GoDaddy for over a year to provide a specific Intel vPro site to help customers buy Remote Configuration Certificates.  Glad to see someone was able to get them to add a link on thier site.  http://help.godaddy.com/article/5260

      0 Comments Permalink

      Moore's Law is a well known part of history of Intel.  Lesser known is how that impacts the networking world.  Many of the features of modern Ethernet are offload workloads from the processor(s).  The effect of Moore's law is that the CPU gets faster at doing those workloads at the same rate that the Ethernet controller does.  At Intel, we learned that lesson with our PRO/100 Smart adapter and it really came home with our PRO/100 Intelligent adapter.  These are older 10/100 megabit adapters and they were offloading IPX workloads.  The cards had processors on board to put together IPX data streams and move the data into the memory of the host system.  The PRO/100 Smart came out just as the Intel486™  to Pentium® processor transition was happening.  The 486 and this new thing called PCI bus, really couldn't handle the 100Mb workloads.  The Smart moved the datagram assembly into the coprocessor and things were good (on the early Pentiums at least).  However, as the same cards went into faster buses and faster systems, the net improvements went down.  We upgraded the PRO/100 Smart into the PRO/100 Intelligent with a faster coprocessor and Ethernet controllers (not to mention almost half the size) but things didn't reflect as well as we had hoped.  The Pentium II processor was out and the PCI chipsets had gained significant performance since their introduction.  Even with the coming Gigabit transition, we could see the writing on the wall.  The power of the coprocessor would never be more than the gains of power of the processor via Moore's law.  The data offload would work for one generation, then be made worthless by the next processor.  We looked into making a third generation offload card for the Gigabit generation, but we figured out that within six months of launch, another Intel CPU would come out to remove any performance advantage the offloads created.

      Software was already a problem since the operating system likes to control things like the network interface.  When data movement is offloaded from the domain of the O/S, it can take a lot of work with the O/S vendor.  With our IPX offloads, that just meant working with Novell*.  They were very willing partners.  But not all vendors and O/S teams are like that.  Because the code that runs on the coprocessor is closed source, it can have very limited acceptance in open source engagements.  The code on the coprocessor would also be subject to defects that could be harder to fix in the field than a driver issue.  Nobody really likes having to get new firmware.  Not to mention what could happen if an exploit was in the offload code.  With the O/S in charge, the risk of exploits can be limited since the admin can close off ports, or hand patch the exploit.  In the coprocessor model, you are at the mercy of the adapter vendor.  And the only mitigation is to either turn off the coprocessor (which may not always be an option) or remove or shutdown the card.  Not something our customer support people were very happy about having to recommend.

                 The return on investment calculation was easy when we looked at it.  Moore's Law would always put our coprocessor to reduced effectiveness almost by the time the card shipped.  The software model was easy on paper, but the realities of O/S vendors, exploit risks and field upgrades made it very complex.  No matter how many we shook the magic 8 ball, all signs pointed to No.

      So our IPX offload engine card family ended before the third generation was launched.  We put our efforts into dataflow efficiency and stateless offloads that would provide value no matter the CPU abilities.  This has provided value to our customer no matter what processor goes into it. Fighting Moore’s Law is like fighting the tide. Rather, we took the strategy to ride the tide and use stateless offloads to reduce latency. Today, our strategy has paid off; we have systems that can saturate multiple bidirectional 10 Gigabit links.  

      Time to wrap up our history lesson:

      1)  Moore's Law means the processor you buy tomorrow will most likely out perform the offload you buy today without allowing enough time to return the extra cost of a coprocessor.

      2)  What looks good on paper is often proved less than effective by the real world

      3)  Thanks for using Intel Ethernet products.

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

       

      At TechEd Europe 2009, Microsoft's Keith Mayer outlines how manageability can be achieved with Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 and Intel's Westmere-EP.     

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      La imaginación es una cualidad que distingue al hombre por eso te invitamos a diseñar el nuevo auto del futuro mediante una aplicación creada por Intel para que todos tengan la posibilidad de sentirse parte de “Patrocinando el futuro”.

        

      Con la aplicación podrás decidir por medio de qué energía funcionará tu auto, elegir las características y posibilidades de éste, optar por un diseño exterior y también ver el interior de tu super auto del futuro. Cuando hayas terminado el diseño puedes enviarlo por email o agregar el código HTML y embeber tu auto en tu página favorita o en las redes sociales que utilizas más a menudo.

      No pierdas la oportunidad de dejar volar tu imaginación y divertirte.


       

      Links


      Intel.
      aplicación


       

                      Digg    Newsvine

      0 Comments Permalink

      What is a type 1 hypervisor you ask? According to Wikipedia it is a software system that runs directly on the host's hardware to control the hardware and to monitor guest operating-systems. A guest operating system thus runs on another level above the hypervisor. An example of this is VMware’s ESX server which has been available now for some time. So why do I think type 1 hypervisors will be “game changers”? Because in the not too distant future, they will be available on desktops and laptops rather than just servers. This will allow us to “unhook” the OS from desktop and laptop hardware much like what ESX did for servers.

       

       

      Image management for desktops and laptops will change. It will be possible to file transfer a virtual container (with your OS and Apps) to your desktop on top of the type 1 hypervisor. It will be possible to patch an OS or application just once and resend that patched virtual container to all desktops and laptops. The compute cycles for the OS and applications will occur on the desktops and not on the server(s). So unlike a Terminal Services server or a VDI server we will not need lots and lots of memory in the servers containing the virtual containers. After all, the virtual container server is not doing any computing, but rather it is just transferring the files (virtual containers).  And we will probably not need near as many servers in the data center as we need for Terminal Services/VDI. A server with a lot less memory than for Terminal Services/VDI will be able to file transfer hundreds of virtual containers.

       

       

      Currently, most desktops and laptops are configured today like the left side of below diagram, with the OS installed directly on the hardware. The right side of the diagram depicts what the desktops and laptops will look like after type 1 hypervisors are released.

       

      http://www.vproexpert.com/E24VZ/blog2.bmp

       

      So how does one future proof their purchases for this upcoming “game changer”? That’s really easy. By buying vPro desktops and laptops! vPro systems have the necessary firmware to run this type 1 hypervisor today! What about security you ask? Well we have thought of that too. It’s called TXT and we will get into that in my next blog.

      Bob

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      Take a look at the posted document for step by step instructions on Windows 7 Migration with SCCM SP2.  This document includes how to create an image using SCCM, Installing drivers, Installing Applications, Creating Hardlinks with the User State Migration Tool, and Renaming and Joining the domain.  This document allows IT technicians to create an Win 7 image, deploy it to their environment using collections, and upgrade their existing Windows XP clients to Windows 7 clients without having to remove the data and put the data back.  Included in this guide is some tips and hints on getting the image deployment to work for your company.

       

      http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-4079

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      This issue of the newsletter has some good content about using Intel vPro Technology. A new use case reference design was published recently; this one has to do with using Radmin to perform basic Intel AMT functions on a managed client. (What's a use case reference design? Read my blog: New stuff in the community: Use Case Reference Designs) You'll also find links to a white paper about Failsafe and Intel Anti-Theft Technology, a registration link for a Windows 7 webinar that's coming up, and some real-world stories about companies that have implemented Intel vPro technology in their environments.

       

      Read the newsletter or subscribe to receive it in your inbox automatically. This newsletter goes out every two weeks.

       

      Enjoy!

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      I have to admit, I have never had the opportunity to be involved in HPC, Super Computing, or the communities that have evolved around such things.  My first real experience with it was yesterday at SC09 in Portland, Oregon.  A conference like any other was my thinking.  But, when I started walking around the exhibition area (booths), I was amazed at the number of Universities and education based solutions that were represented.

       

      Here is a quick montage of images that I put together of the educational facilities I saw and took a picture of...

      SC09_Education.JPG

      I am sure there are many, many more, but I only captured the few that are represented here.

       

      The one on the bottom left is not really an educational institution, but rather a company that I stopped and talked with for a few minutes.  They essentially offer up their datacenter and supercomputer infrastructure for all the education facilities in the state of Alabama... K-12 and Universities too.

       

      Here is another picture I took of a scout troop that was visiting the event.  What a great opportunity for them to see and hear all about the most powerful computers in the world.

      SC09 038.jpg

       

      Here they are again listening (attentively) to a speaker from NASA talkiing about the expansion of the universe and how we study it.

      SC09 054.jpg

       

      Education is and should remain a priority for all of us.  This is hopefully a good reminder of that.  It certainly was for me.

      -Greg

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      What is iWARP?  (Click here to find out)

      Ethernet Tom here.  I’ve recently come into the Intel Ethernet group – marketing Ethernet products in the HPC, Financial, and Cloud verticals.  

      And very HPC relevant -  I’ve been very busy getting things lined up for Super Computing ’09 and wanted to share what we have happening:

      ·         3 demos: 

      o   Intel Booth:  Two 6-node clusters (96 total cores!) running NYSE’s Data Fabric* middleware – showing iWARP vs. non-iWARP 

      o   Supermicro Booth:  4-node cluster running Fluent

      o   EA Booth:  4-node cluster running Linpack in a converged Ethernet environment

      ·         5 presentations:

      o   Data Transportation at iWARP Speed – Feargal O’Sullivan – NYSE Technologies

      o   Memory Virtualization over iWARP for  Radical Application Acceleration – Tom Matson – RNA Networks:

      o   A 10Gigabit  Ethernet iWARP Storage Appliance – Paul Grun – System Fabric Works

      o   CD-adapco Benchmarking Performance using Intel iWARP – William Meigs – Intel Corporation

      o   iWARP – What & Why? – Tom Stachura – Intel Corporation

      If you are here today (final day of SC’09!), stop by and check it out.  If not, I’ll come back later with some video links.

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      Picture 1.png

      Es muy bueno cuando hablan bien de nosotros, sobre todo porque reconforta saber que lo que uno hace con tanto compromiso, es valorado por los demás. Esta introducción vale para contarles sobre un nuevo reconocimiento que acabamos de recibir, y nos llena de orgullo.

       

      Fuimos elegidos, por el voto de los CIOs (máximos ejecutivos de tecnología de empresas)  como el proveedor de tecnología de mayor valor y confiabilidad. La encuesta que nos otorgó el 86% de los votos entre bueno y excelente, fue realizada por la revista estadounidense especializada CIO Insight.

       

      Entre los aspectos más valorados de Intel, los CIOs de empresas de los Estados Unidos señalaron la calidad (93 % nominó a la empresa entre excelente y buena en este rubro, 1º puesto), la reducción de costos (88 %, 1º puesto), la confiabilidad a lo largo del tiempo (88%, también el más votado) y el retorno de la inversión –ROI- (86%, 1º puesto).

       

      Además, el 97 % de los CIOs encuestados respondieron que si tuvieran la posibilidad, continuarían eligiendo a Intel, lo que la ubica como la empresa tecnológica mejor posicionada entre los CIOs en el ítem fidelidad.

       

      El año 2009 marca la séptima edición del estudio, y a la vez la primera ocasión en la que Intel participa del mismo. Por esta razón, y por tratarse de una las pocas compañías que participan de la encuesta que no provee tecnología de forma directa, esta valoración de Intel cobra mayor importancia.

       

      Links


      Intel.


       

                      Digg    Newsvine

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      If you're reading this blog posting, hopefully you've read my blog post on CIRA last week -

      http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/vproexpert/blog/2009/11/10/cira-and-fast-call-for-help--what-is-it-where-can-i-find-it

       

      Firstly, I wanted to share with you that over the past week we have actually worked through an entire end to end setup with a real-world customer (i.e. not just inside Intel labs) and now we have CIRA and AMT functionality over CIRA working successfully!

       

      If you're wondering which of the management consoles and MPS/vPro Gateways were used - it was LANDesk 8.8 SP3 in this case (remember that LANDesk bundle their own MPS/vPro Gateway offering). If you're looking to get this to work in your environment (CIRA with LANDesk specifically) please do get in touch and I can share some specific current LANDesk pointers with you (that are not mentioned in this blog posting).

       

      Some of the things we came across last week which are good pointers to pay attention to:

      1. There are 4 ports that get configured with the MPS which are fully configurable (i.e. they are not restricted to being a specific port number) - however, you cannot re-use the same port number, you need to have 4 distinct port numbers (sounds trivial, but it happens).
      2. You can use port 16993 as one of the port numbers, even though that is the port that is used for https connections in AMT (there is no conflict)
      3. In the httpd.conf file - instead of havinga deny all and allow specific IP addresses, you might want to change to allow all
      4. CIRA relies on the DHCP option 15 that is allocated where the vPro client is to be different than what it was pre-configured with - that is how the system knows it is outside the corporate environment. If DHCP option 15 happens to be blank where your vPro clients connect from - that is good enough. Blank is considered different and CIRA works fine.
      5. Currently, you should install the LANDesk agent after provisioning is completed
      6. Check through selecting the 'vPro Status' operation on a provisioned vPro client to ensure all the LANDesk NED settings have been deposited properly on the vPro client prior to taking it out of the corporate environment.

       

      Btw, the CIRA connection is established through a user click at the OS-level using the IMSS utility.

       

      So the bottom line is we now have close to 100 systems that are confirmed to be have full AMT functionality working over a CIRA connection in a real live environment - it works! (

       

      The 2nd part of the blog can be considered a more 'advanced topic' and is devoted to what happens if your management console of choice doesn't currently support CIRA...

      One Management Console for example that is currently not supporting CIRA is Microsoft SCCM (even with SP2).

       

      The options as I see them, are:

      1. Contact your software vendor and ask them whether they support Intel - Intel works with multiple software vendors on incorporating support for various Intel vPro features (CIRA amongst others) - they can hear it from us, but it is much better if they hear it from you.
      2. Your software vendor might have plans to introduce support for CIRA, however it is further down the line - so it is just a question of time.  
      3. Try and engineer something yourself to have CIRA work in the environment you have setup

       

      At least for testing your environment for what CIRA would look like, you could leverage the WebUI tool. You would need to have an MPS installed and configured first of all. Thereafter, all that you need to do is configure the proxy settings in the web-browser you are using to the IP address/FQDN of where you have your MPS installed and also enter the default http proxy port of 8080 - that will be sufficient for getting your WebUI to work over a CIRA connection.

      untitled.bmp

       

      If you use Microsoft Internet Explorer you are limited only to the http proxy portion which will allow several of the AMT operations to work over a CIRA connection, but not SOL/IDER for example.

      If you are using Mozilla Fire Fox for example, you can configure a SOCKS proxy as well, which can handle routing SOL/IDER traffic as well.

       

      If we take the example of Microsoft SCCM, what you can do is to use the scripting framework that has been used successfully for something like: providing out of band 802.1x in Microsoft SCCM SP1 (it is natively supported now in SP2) - http://communities.intel.com/message/10877

      You can configure the correct settings for the vPro client to be able to contact the MPS Proxy Server and establish a CIRA connection between the MPS Server and the vPro client, however you will still need your management console to integrate and be aware of this CIRA connection to be able to do something useful.

      What you could do at this point is to configure a 'transparent proxy' - what that would typically entail is to configure the MPS IP address/FQDN as a proxy routing that will be inserted in the headers of packets that go through the router to which the Server that is hosting the management software. You can use something like Cisco WCCP (Web Cache Control Protocol) to set this up. At this point, Microsoft SCCM will not be aware that the packets it is sending are actually being re-routed through the MPS to the vPro clients (which is aware of the remote vPro client) and that is why this is called a transparent proxy.

       

      A caveat/disclaimer I would add though is that albeit technically feasible you would need to put together the full working solution yourselves and support it yourselves.

       

      0 Comments Permalink
      0

      Webinar Recording

      If you missed the live event, you can now watch the recording! You can also download the webinar.

       

      Webinar Slides

      Want to download the deck? It's attached to this blog post (scroll to the bottom).

       

      Links

      0 Comments Permalink
      1

      Green Storage in The Server Room

      Posted by Curt Bruns Nov 18, 2009

      It’s not just about energy-sipping systems—it’s also about your storage footprint

       

      Most of us are familiar with the concept of green IT: increasing energy efficiency across the enterprise to trim costs and optimize resources. While you hear a lot about servers helping to reduce energy usage, not as much is said about storage. Intel and the storage industry are working together to provide green storage solutions, too.

      For the storage community, every system has to be cost-effective as well as performance-driven, which means energy efficiency is a key consideration. It starts at the processor level, where the Intel® Xeon® processor 5500 series is extending the boundaries of energy efficient performance.

      Many storage system providers have picked up on the Intel Xeon processor 5500 series since it was introduced last March. For example, the HP StorageWorks XP10000* Disk Array and 3000 Enterprise* Virtual Array are based on the new processors. Schooner Information Technology appliances leverage quad-core Intel Xeon 5500 processors and half a terabyte of Intel® X25-E flash memory. The bottom line for the Schooner appliances is an 80 percent decrease in power and cooling requirements versus ordinary servers.

      But green storage isn’t just about power consumption at the processor or system level. An equally important green strategy is to reduce the overall storage footprint, and a number of technologies are available to help IT organizations implement this strategy.

      Virtualization is driving huge data center energy savings by greatly reducing the number of physical machines in the data center. As Bob Fine, director of product marketing at Compellent, pointed out at the 2009 Storage Networking World conference last spring, many large enterprises realize that they’re approaching a cap. “They can only get a certain amount of power in their data centers and see virtualization as a way to reduce their power requirements,” says Fine. “Instead of building new data centers, they can stay in the ones they have, saving millions of dollars in the process.”

      Many IT managers tell Intel that storage can be a big gating factor when it comes to scaling virtual environments. The Intel Xeon processor 5500 series uses Intel® HT Technology within each processor core, doubling the number of threads that can be processed at the same time. This option permits more efficient workloads and enables storage servers to virtualize more applica­tions. Intel HT Technology is also more energy efficient than traditional threaded processing.

      Compellent and Hitachi Data Systems (HDS), both users of the Intel Xeon processors, recommend reducing the storage footprint in other ways as well. “Limit the amount of content you need to store by using technologies like data deduplication,” advises Asim Zaheer, vice president of product and competitive marketing at HDS. “Also, don’t have wasted capacity or wasted systems—that’s where tiered storage and virtualization come into play.” 

      Compellent’s Fine sees tiered storage as especially important when using expensive disk resources like solid-state drives (SSD). By limiting SSD to the top tier, a company could save on drive costs and increase storage efficiency. “Only the active data would sit on SSD, and all the inactive data would go onto a tier-three SATA drive,” says Fine. “Since SSD drives are about 10 times the cost of Fibre Channel, it’s very important to gain those kinds of efficiencies.”

      Isilon Systems, another user of Intel processors, has a pay-as-you-grow model for its clustered storage products that makes it easier to avoid over-provisioning and wasting power. If a customer needs to add more performance, Isilon can provide nodes with Intel processors and memory, but no storage. If the customer requires capacity only, Isilon sells nodes with just disks. In addition, Isilon uses ColdWatt power supplies, which it says are about 30 percent more efficient than traditional power supplies.

      As Intel works with the storage industry to deliver more energy-efficient and high-performance storage solutions, we’d like to know what IT organizations are doing to implement green storage technologies in the data center. If you work in IT and have fresh perspectives to make your organization more efficient, you’re invited to share your ideas  here.   

      1 Comments Permalink
      1 2 3 ... 63 Previous Next